Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “Why did the fascists call their rally “unite the right”?”— Tim Larkin The ‘wh

    —“Why did the fascists call their rally “unite the right”?”— Tim Larkin

    The ‘white nationalists’ were copying the left’s ‘identity politics’ by trying to form a coalition (‘unite”) of the various groups within the masculine white working and middle class identity, just as the left has done so among the effeminate and underclass and minority identities.

    I told them over two years ago that they were going to fail, because it is no more moral to force the underclasses and minorities to live by meritocracy, than it is to ask the working and middle classes to live by equality.

    And so the proper answer is not to seek power under the left’s model uniting under identity politics against western civlization’s meritocracy, but to agitate for secession, and ‘going our separate ways”.

    Which is a moral proposition. Because whether left fascism or right fascism both sides are demanding what is not in the interest of the other side. And if that moral proposition is not met, the violent revolution is the only alternative.

    That is what will happen now, I expect. And it was probably necessary for the alt-right to fail at using the alt-left’s identity politics in order to resign themselves to civil war.

    But it was what I have been saying for over a decade.

    Revolution comes.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 10:47:00 UTC

  • I DON’T WRITE ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACY – BUT ABOUT WESTERN CIVILIZATION’S INNOVATIO

    I DON’T WRITE ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACY – BUT ABOUT WESTERN CIVILIZATION’S INNOVATIONS THAT ALL NATIONS AND PEOPLES CAN COPY FOR THEMSELVES

    First, I don’t write white supremacy, I write about *why did europe drag humanity out of ignorance superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and tyranny, in both the ancient world and the modern world?*

    Second I write more anti-racism than any other conservative living that I know of.

    Third I state that by adopting western civilization’s methods, and nationalism, that all people can escape ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, and tyranny.

    Fourth, I state that all of this can be done by nothing more than rule of law under natural law, and small, homoenous, redistributive nations.

    The fact that *nationalists around the world* follow me for that reason is obvious evidence.

    Let me ask you a question. If I was to tell you that you and all your relatives on both sides of your family, out to six generations, have to have only one child, and that we will tax you such that you can only have one child, for the next two centuries, then how would you feel about it? (You might feel that your family was being exterminated.)

    Now, imagine that your family had managed its reproduction, mate selection, savings, education, children, and land for many generations and were being exterminated by current government policy. How would you feel about it? ( How you feel is determined by your current feelings of security, and your family’s achievements – or lack thereof.)

    Now, do you agree or disagree that diversity decreases trust and increases political competition? (It decreases trust, increases transaction costs, decreases the influence of norms, and increases political competition for rents and privileges.)

    Do you agree or disagree that groups of people from similar racial, subracial, tribal, and class backgrounds demonstrate greater or less genetic neoteny, and greater or less sexual dimorphism, and lower or higher distributions of intellectual, emotional, and physical abilities? (sorry but they do. the primary difference between groups and classes is neotonic selection and sexual dimorphism)

    Do you agree or disagree that people who are ‘with their own people’ and are disadvantaged by birth, take better care of their own people, with less usury and abuse? (they do demonstrably, everywhere. hence why nordics redistribute and tribal peoples don’t.)

    Do you agree or disagree that we have a responsibility to one another to insure the happiness and improvement of each tribe, subrace, race, and mankind in each generation? (I see no other choice – not because of high mindedness, but because it is the only possible answer for mutually assured success.)

    All human groups have the ability to reach equality through demographic evolution or demographic devolution. All human groups at present are dramatically unequal. And all human groups that attempt to integrate descend into dysgenia, ignorance, and poverty – demographic devolution. Europe and china excelled because we were homogenous and able to insulate themselves from the steppe and desert people who were less able to self domesticate through generations of selection under farming.

    These are purely scientific questions with purely scientific answers.

    So….

    Is it or is it not possible that what you feel and understand is simply *false* and damaging to mankind? Or is it that you were born with feelings that do not require empirical evidence in order to test whether they are true or not?

    Is it possible or not possible that just as you do not understand how economics function between the home, the locality, the nation, and the world, that norms and institutions function differently at different scales – for the same reason: you are generally wrong about everything above and below the scale of your perceptions.

    Unless you understand the very deep sophistication of my arguments then you are just another useful idiot in the enslavement by lies, credit, and laws that women and slaves were in the ancient world – and destroyed the four great civilization sin the ancient world – feeling just as you do. And you are just as useful an idiot in destroying the great civilizations of the modern world – feeling as you do.

    Let a thousand gods, a thousand temples, a thousand nations bloom. But end monopoly where people like me and mine must share a government with people like you and yours.

    Sharing a government is a bad thing. It leads to conflict everywhere in the world that it has been tried.

    So, I am willing to let you live freely as you wish. Are you willing to let me live freely as I wish?

    If not then civil war is the only choice. And it is the Just and Right choice.

    Because refusal would be the ultimate immorality.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 12:27:00 UTC

  • SLAVS AND GERMANICS ARE DIFFERENT ‘GENERATIONS’ You can conflate Corded ware (Po

    SLAVS AND GERMANICS ARE DIFFERENT ‘GENERATIONS’

    You can conflate Corded ware (Polish-Ukrainian territory), with celto-italic-germanic, which is true.

    BUT while polish people speak a slavic language, slavs, (slavonic speakers), are (a) a much younger people, with no history and possibly only a proto-language prior to 700.

    So while it may be possible to say that we all share black-sea ancestors, it is false to say they were slavs. The population-radiation is out of poland, for the simple reason that it’s the best farmland other than france. And the genome spreads from Poland on the north sea, well into western ukraine.

    It is more correct to say that today’s slavs are the youngest and most ‘recent’ white people to evolve, and possibly that they are purest genetic europeans.

    What you can’t say is that there is any relationship between the term Slav and any of the successes in the west. There isn’t *any* justification for that.

    So use ‘early europeans’ as our common ancestors and you’re ok.

    The general evidence is that the people who spoke germanic languages around the north sea evolved physical traits superior to all other european tribes in the modern world, largely through self-domestication. The corded ware culture probably created the waves of european excellence in the ancient world.

    More by Simon Ström:

    “Corded Ware” is probably too narrow, i.e., accounts only for one out of two important subsets of the sum total of the post 3,000 BC westward Yamnaya movements which together produced a “proto-white” core population.

    The other major population being related rather to the Bell Beaker phenomenon, dominated by R1b Steppe clans migrating via the Sub-carpathian/Pannonian route as opposed to the territory of Poland and Ukraine which is associated with early Corded Ware).

    Subsets of the Bell Beaker subsequently departed to colonize the British Isles and Scandinavia without significant admixture with the previous inhabitants. (Displacement).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 10:55:00 UTC

  • I am patriotic to my people, and the rule of law

    I am patriotic to my people, and the rule of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 20:45:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897197383595044866

    Reply addressees: @Digitalgreatime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897173148256399360

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/897173148256399360

  • WE *CAN* WIN A DOMINANT ROLE, SO YOU MUST MAKE IT WORTH OUR WHILE *NOT* TO WIN A

    WE *CAN* WIN A DOMINANT ROLE, SO YOU MUST MAKE IT WORTH OUR WHILE *NOT* TO WIN A DOMINANT ROLE

    By Eli Harman (edited for general audience)

    ————–

    Eli’s arguments are reducible to 1) yes women think they can rebel against the compromise between the genders without men doing the same – and this is what the world will look like if men do the same: sharia law is an illustration of what occurs if men want it to. 2) women have consistently voted to destroy the compromise between the genders, to the extent that the current destruction of western civilization through disintegration of the family and massive immigration that would never have happened without women voting consistently for it. (Yep, thats the data) 3) men should all rebel against western civilization as well, and imitate the muslims (hence ‘white sharia’ memes) – because the islamic model is the more beneficial condition for men. So Eli’s arguments are meant to illustrate and agitate, as a politicized version of the Men’s Rights Movement.

    ( BTW: * All psychologism is lying. We all follow incentives. if you cannot argue using incentives, you’re just using the feminine technique of gossiping, disapproval, shaming, ridiculing, rallying. It is not argument. We all know this. Note that Eli uses incentives not psychologisms. )

    -Curt

    ————–

    It is reasonable to suppose that the aim of your disapproval, ridicule, shaming, and rallying, is not simply to call attention to a man’s sexual market value, but to diminish it – to retaliate for thoughts and statements (which are obviously the real issue) and to obtain moral and social leverage to COERCE men into silence by the threat of further diminishment.

    This is a credible threat because women gauge such things, not independently, but largely from social cues.

    By manufacturing these cues, through rallying, shaming, and gossip, women have lately succeeded in attaining unprecedented social and institutional power to organize the administration of social sanction and sexual boycott, to advance their interests against men’s and to impose their sensibilities and imperatives upon men.

    We call these means, RALLYING, SHAMING, and GOSSIP, together, “the feminine means of coercion.” They are analogous to more masculine means of coercion (VIOLENCE) in that they aim, not at the discovery or propagation of TRUTH, but at the achievement of particular outcomes by RAISING THE COSTS of the behaviors against which they are directed.

    Another word that was formerly employed for the same thing, was being “unladylike.”

    That’s an important point to bring up because ladylike behavior is a logical and necessary correlate and corequisite for gentlemanly behavior. You can’t have the one without the other.

    Since you have crossed that line, one has a number of choices for how to respond.

    1) Submit, surrender to your authority, repent, and plead for leniency. (Not gonna happen.)

    2) Retaliate in kind by making disparaging comments about your ages, likely past sexual indiscretions, or emotional baggage.

    3) Resort to more masculine means of coercion (violence.)

    But, despite your early resort to the feminine means of coercion, (rallying, shaming, gossip) you have nevertheless demonstrated uncommon aptitude and understanding so I am willing to offer an additional option

    4) retreat to the realm of facts, issues, and ideas and discuss those in their own terms and in good faith.

    As far as that goes, the main issue is that rights do not exist as you think they exist.

    Rights can exist productively and sustainably if they are obtained in exchange, one benefit or consideration for another (e.g. gentlemanly behavior for ladylike) then it can be a win-win, and durable.

    If cooperation based on rights originating in exchange and resulting in mutual benefits breaks down there are two further options. Non-cooperation (boycott, disassociation) or conflict (coercion) aiming to obtain surrender and submission (option 1 above.)

    But if you resort to conflict and coercion (by the feminine means) there is no reason for me to try to cooperate with you. Cooperation can’t be a one way street.

    And you have ruined option 1 for yourselves (going forward) by making submission to feminine sensibilities and imperatives more costly – for men – than resorting to conflict, which men can win, because we have more means of coercion at our disposal, if we only use them.

    You don’t understand that submission to your demands is now too costly for men or why, because you don’t understand male sensibilities or male endeavors.

    But that is the fact. And even if we cannot communicate the full dimensions and characteristics of that fact to you, because you are women, we can communicate that it is a fact, by a variety of means.

    And now we will.

    You claim that men feel entitled to a dominant role.

    But we don’t feel that I am entitled to anything. And neither are you entitled to anything.

    We are simply able, by virtue of my superior size, strength, aggression, and risk tolerance, in confederation with our friends and allies (men also do allegiance, loyalty and solidarity better than women) to WIN a dominant role.

    So if you don’t want us to win a dominant role then you have to make it worth my while not to try to win a dominant role. Or you have to make it worth someone’s while to stop me from winning a dominant role.

    But you’re not going to keep getting things for nothing, or by the means by which you have been getting them, namely the feminine means of coercion (rallying, shaming, and gossip.)

    The Gravy Train is over.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 08:33:00 UTC

  • Nah. Been planning it for over a decade. Everything going according to plan. Lik

    Nah. Been planning it for over a decade. Everything going according to plan. Like clockwork. Why? Demographics drive everything. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 00:48:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896896377304862721

    Reply addressees: @Digitalgreatime

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896887076649619456

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896887076649619456

  • There used to be good ethnographic data on Mexico but it’s almost all ‘been disa

    There used to be good ethnographic data on Mexico but it’s almost all ‘been disappeared’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 18:15:00 UTC

  • ARGENTINIAN DEMOGRAPHICS —“Argentineans carried a large fraction of European g

    ARGENTINIAN DEMOGRAPHICS

    —“Argentineans carried a large fraction of European genetic heritage in their Y-chromosomal (94.1%) and autosomal (78.5%) DNA, but their mitochondrial gene pool is mostly of Native American ancestry (53.7%); instead, African heritage was small in all three genetic systems (<4%).”—

    —“European ancestry in mtDNA (44.3%) and Y-chromosome (94.1%) gives an estimate of 69.2%, compared to 78.6% for autosomal markers. Native S. American in mtDNA (53.7%) and Y-chromosome (4.9%) gives an estimate of 29.3%, compared to 17.28% for autosomal markers. Finally, African mtDNA (2%) and Y-chromosomes (0.9%) gives an estimate of 1.45% compared to 4.15% for the autosomal markers.”—

    —“The median Argentinean probably has enough indigenous ancestry to qualify as a Native American tribal member in the United States by the rules of blood quantum (on the order of 20-25%).”—

    I don’t trust anything I’ve read. The DNA samples are too small, and the other stats too questionable.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:39:00 UTC

  • THE WORLD AGAINST WHITES via Steve Pender —“When Islamists blow children up at

    THE WORLD AGAINST WHITES

    via Steve Pender

    —“When Islamists blow children up at Ariana Grande concerts, it’s not a problem of Islam. When they drive a car into a crowd and start stabbing people at Ohio State, THEY are the ones who need sympathy because our civilized cultured “shocked” them. When they shoot dozens of gays at a night club, Democrats invite their parents to stand behind Hillary at her next rally. When their brarbous murder is so predictable that for weeks on end during what’s known as the Ramadon Bombathon they go on a global killing rampage driving truck after truck into crowds of people on the London bridge, it’s blamed on the racist whites who for not welcoming their genocide with arms opened widely enough.

    When Islam kills thousands of people in unspeakable terror attacks year after year the violence is ignored, the victims are ignored, and the perpetrators are treated as the victims. #NotAllMuslims, because the left feeds on the harvest of the brown vote farm.

    How many times did blacks have literal riots where they shouted about killing police and then ACTUALLY KILLED POLICE, but it was simply “peaceful protesting”? How about when a liberal was drunk from the hysteria and ACTUALLY SHOT A CONGRESSMAN, surely it had nothing to do with unprecedented fake news and plays and books glamorizing the murder of Republicans.

    But we supposedly live in a white supremacists where whites—who are for better or worse the founders of Europe and the USA and everywhere that’s civilized where brown people flock to and are welcomed more graciously than anywhere else in history—when these whites want to gather IN THEIR OWN LAND and advocate for their right to continue existing and to protest the erasure of our culture and history they require a federal permit that the states won’t recognize, a national emergency is called before the event can even begin, the president and ALL of the media condemns them, and when ONE person goes too far and when ONE leftist dies it’s obviously because all non-leftists are white supremacists and everyone on all sides in America and now around the globe condemns the hate from “white supremacists”.

    It’s not a left VS right thing any more. It’s THE WORLD VS whites, where all the violence and hysteria of every side is ignored or rationalized, or even blamed on whites, and where ANY resistance by whites is condemned as white supremacy. But remember that democracy is a vote farm, and they’ll turn on any untouchable group the second they find cheaper votes from a different group.”—-John R (I don’t know who that is)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:19:00 UTC

  • YOU WILL ABSOLUTELY DEVELOP A RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM IN ANY DIVERSE POLITY THE DEMO

    YOU WILL ABSOLUTELY DEVELOP A RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM IN ANY DIVERSE POLITY

    THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF BRAZIL

    WHITES

    47.73% of Brazilans or 91 million are White. White Brazilians are defined as people who are solely or mostly descended from European immigrants

    15% of Brazilians or 31 million citizens are of Italian extraction, the largest number outside of Italy itself.

    The descendants of European immigrants, particularly the Germans, Italians, Austrians, Swiss, Poles, Ukrainians, French, Dutch, Lithuanians, Scandinavians, Russians, Hungarians, Finns and Luxembourgers are mainly concentrated in the southern part of the country, in the states of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, and the most populous, São Paulo; these states have a wide majority of citizens of European descent. São Paulo alone has the largest population in absolute numbers with 30 million whites. In the rest of the country, part of the white population is of colonial Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish and French settler stock, especially in the Northeast. In the mid-southern states of Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and in the Federal District, the number of whites (European and Levantine phenotype) revolves around 50% of the population, being somewhat equal to the absolute number of Afro-Brazilians, East Asians and mixed race Brazilians, i.e., Caboclos or Mestizo/Castizo, Mulattoes, Eurasians and Gypsies altogether.

    THE BROWNS

    The Pardos (“Browns”) make up 43.13% or 82.3 million people of Brazil’s population. Although, according to DNA resources, most Brazilians possess some degree of mixed-race ancestry, less than 45% of the country’s population classified themselves as being part of this group due to phenotype.

    The Pardos can be a mixture of Europeans, Levantine Arabs, Crypto-Jews or Anusim, Blacks, Amerindians, Gypsies and Asians. Brazil does not have a category for multiracial people, but a Pardo (brown) one, which may include caboclos, mulatos, cafuzos (local ethnonyms for people of noticeable mixed White and Amerindian, Black and White, and Amerindian and Black descent, i.e., mestizos, mulattoes and zambos, respectively), the multiracial result of their intermixing (despite most of White and Black Brazilians possessing some degree of race-mixing, since brownness in Brazil is a matter of phenotype) and assimilated, westernized indigenous people.

    ROMA

    The pardo category in Brazil also includes 800 thousand gypsies or Roma people, most of them coming from Portugal but also different countries in Eastern Europe and the Baltics.

    JEWS

    Jews in Brazil are a small but sizable population,[25][26] and they include mostly Ashkenazi Jews (who also arrived with the post-colonial contingent of European migration),[27] a smaller proportion of Sephardi Jews (mostly Eastern Sephardim arrived with the contingent of post-colonial immigrants from Syria and Lebanon, but also North African Sephardim from Morocco settled in the Amazon, and Western Sephardim arrived with the Dutch), and to a much lesser extent Mizrahi Jews. Overall, the small but sizable Brazilian Jewish community is concentrated especially in São Paulo,[28] Rio de Janeiro[29] and Porto Alegre,[30] and they are accounted for without Brazilian descendants of Portuguese “New Christians” (ethnic Sephardic Jews forced to convert to Christianity and arrived with the ethnic Portuguese during the colonial period),[27] which if included would inflate the Jewish origin population in Brazil considerably. By themselves, Brazilian descendants of Portuguese “New Christians” are estimated to account for a figure anywhere between hundreds of thousands to several million.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:36:00 UTC