Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • NATIONAL (MIDDLE CLASS) SOCIALISM, VS INTERNATIONAL (UNDERCLASS) COMMUNISM Natio

    NATIONAL (MIDDLE CLASS) SOCIALISM, VS INTERNATIONAL (UNDERCLASS) COMMUNISM

    National Socialism (Tribalism) Pro Western vs. International Communism (Classism) Anti-Western.

    National Socialism: Defensive Strategy: Monopoly High Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public limits on and cooperation with Industry, Private commerce, Not autarkic but highly nationalist trade biases. With the purpose of policy the intergenerational family, and the suppression of the underclasses. Right of Exit. (Middle Class and Working Class Bias)

    International Communism: Offensive Strategy: Monopoly Low Culture, Industrialized production of commons, Public control of industry, public control of commerce, Not Autarkic but Expansionist. The purpose of policy the ‘individual’, and the expansion and ‘uplifting’ of the underclasses. (Laboring Class and Underclass Bias)

    You know the ancient world origins of judaism, christianity, and islam are in the underclass revolution against the (white) aristocracy, by replacing tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Achilles (the wealthy farmers), with the tragedy, sacrifice, and the trials of Jews, Jesus, Muhammed (the poor pastoralists).

    Why do you think that National Socialism (Nationalist Middle Class, Economic warfare) versus International Communism (Universalist Underclass Economic Warfare) is any different in our era than the battle between the high trust middle class agrarian traders, and the low trust lower class pastoralist laborers?

    What is the difference between postmodernism and christianity? None. They’re both for the purpose of making false promises to the underclasses so that they use their numbers to destroy the aristocracy and create a dark age.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-19 16:36:00 UTC

  • Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. S

    Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. Same coloring. Very similar features. We could easily be mistaken for brothers. But what was the difference? they had me by at least a hundred pounds. WTF is modernity doing to my people? We need two innovations in biological warfare: something that kills all rice plants and something that kills all sugar plants. ‘Cause the state has too much interest in the consequences of rice and sugar.

  • Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. S

    Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. Same coloring. Very similar features. We could easily be mistaken for brothers. But what was the difference? they had me by at least a hundred pounds.

    WTF is modernity doing to my people?

    We need two innovations in biological warfare: something that kills all rice plants and something that kills all sugar plants. ‘Cause the state has too much interest in the consequences of rice and sugar.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-11 10:48:00 UTC

  • Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. S

    Ran into two of my distant kinfolk the other day. The Breton kin. Same height. Same coloring. Very similar features. We could easily be mistaken for brothers. But what was the difference? they had me by at least a hundred pounds. WTF is modernity doing to my people? We need two innovations in biological warfare: something that kills all rice plants and something that kills all sugar plants. ‘Cause the state has too much interest in the consequences of rice and sugar.

  • Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people

    Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people.

  • Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people

    Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-05 08:45:00 UTC

  • Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people

    Yeah. I’ve gone native. I have passion for Ukraine, her culture, and her people.

  • THE WISDOM OF RUSSIAN TOLERANCE: BUYING TIME. Russian tolerance for judaism and

    THE WISDOM OF RUSSIAN TOLERANCE: BUYING TIME.

    Russian tolerance for judaism and islam is the same as christian monarchic tolerance for judaism and Islam: when minorities have no access to political power, and you have a state-sponsored, state-owned church, and you have democracy in name only, then it’s possible to USE minorities but not be threatened by them – they have no access to power. And as we saw with the oligarchs, if they obtain it, they can easily lose it. The strong rule.

    Now, whether this remains true over time is something else. It’s doubtful Russians will tolerate islamic levels of ignorance spreading into in their society. They will continue to contain it. And it’s possible Russian leadership is just buying time – from what I understand, that’s the case. Because in twenty years, at current rates of reform – especially reforming rule of law in matters commercial and personal – despite the sanctions, Russia will be a major power again – at least in military, petroleum, and resources. And she will have an advantage: a small population. Which is not something that other nations understand. In a post-market economy, where technology has been equilibrated around the world, then a large territory, lots of resources, and a small population and an exemplary military are the most valuable assets.

    Why? Population – especially below 90IQ – has become a burden again. Whether russian leadership and thought leadership understands this or not is not something I am privy to. However, *it is the right strategy for them, and for Christendom*.

    The Intermarium may choose to go west to the germanic, or east to the finno-russian, or remain lithuanian-polish-ukrainian-czech. I would suggest that latin, germanic, intermarium, and russian civilizations would be more powerful as separate cultures than homogenized.

    The only problem is “how do we import german police and judges?” Because that is, largely, the world’s problem with modernity. They cannot create rule of law. Because they cannot evolve a militia into a judiciary, sheriff and police force without even greater risk of instability. This is the only way to end corruption: the ‘economic privilege’ of the military, judicial, sheriff, and police class must be maintained in order to suppress corruption. And this requires a smaller ‘professional’ military, judicial training via the military ethic, and staffing of sheriff (of the court) and police (of the region), and a large militia ‘reserve’ (of the nation). As long as that hierarchy polices its members, and as long as they are well paid, then corruption can be suppressed. But without it – it can’t.

    The military protects the people from outsiders. the judiciary and the sheriffs protect the people from the state, and the police protect the people from each other. Russia will succeed because like the japanese, they do not place the market about the nation. Which is the opposite westerners, who place the market above the nation – causing their own demise.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-31 13:48:00 UTC

  • THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM Or even better. That those

    THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM

    Or even better. That those myths and that content, was originally greek, roman, and european – and that it was always there even before the church.

    It doesn’t matter what name we call those residues (Pareto called them Residues and Derivations). It isn’t helpful to associate them with the church.

    Those residues and derivations can be stated scientifically, rationally, and mythically. They don’t need the fiction around them at all.

    Rabbinical Judaism was an innovation (reformation) produced from greek ideas.

    Christianity was an innovation (reformation) on judaism produced from greek, roman, and persian ideas.

    What was retained was the 1) the false history to add legitimacy by contrast to the new reformation, 2) the trials of christ story to replace the trials of Achilles story; 3) the underlying argument that the unlanded (poor, ignorant) pastoralists were somehow divine (rather than inferior) to the agrarians and their aristocracy (the strong, wealthy, powerful), 4) the use of all of the above to undermine the aristocracy, commercial, and agrarian society.

    —“when the Christian myths became unbelievable, they left in the minds of even intelligent and educated men a residue, the detritus of the rejected mythology, in the form of superstitions about “all mankind,” “human rights,” and similar figments of the imagination that had gained currency only on the assumption that they had been decreed by an omnipotent deity, so that in practical terms we must regard as basically Christian and religious such irrational cults as Communism and the tangle of fancies that is called “Liberalism” and is the most widely accepted faith among our people today. I am a little encouraged that today some of the more intelligent “Liberals” are at last perceiving that their supposedly rational creed is simply based on the Christian myths they have consciously rejected. I note, for example, that Mary Kenny, who describes herself as “a former radical”, has come to the realization that “so many of the [Liberals’] political ideas… are religious at root. The search for equality in the secular sense is a replacement of the Judaeo-Christian idea that God loves every individual equally… The feelings of guilt or, indeed, pity, which once went into the religious drive, are being transferred to secular ideas to the ultimate destruction of our civilisation.”-Revilo P. Oliver—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-30 17:06:00 UTC

  • While there are minor differences in verbal and spatial ability between the race

    While there are minor differences in verbal and spatial ability between the races and subraces at all levels, which appears to be due to degree of neotonic selection, and degree of selection for sexual dimorphism (in other words, very minor), the principle differences between the races and subraces are the scale of the underclasses, where underclasses are determined by IQ, Neoteny, Dimorphism, Symmetry (lower error).

    In other words, the europeans and east asians were under greater selection pressure for cooperation in harsh agrarian cycles, whereas the warmer climes were under greater selection pressure for early maturity against disease gradients, food availability gradients, and competitor gradients.

    So in that sense while it is true that europeans and east asians are more ‘advanced’ genetically no group is prohibited from achieving the very same rate of genetic development in just a few generations under soft eugneics (reduction of reproduction in the underclasses).

    This means basically that we have been reversing evolution for over a century and a half.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-28 16:36:00 UTC