Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • “So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility the

    –“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’. Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible. Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them. As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did. All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating. That’s just how it is. So, no. All peoples can transcend.

  • “So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility the

    –“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool)

    I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’.

    Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible.

    Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them.

    As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did.

    All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating.

    That’s just how it is.

    So, no. All peoples can transcend.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 12:10:00 UTC

  • And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and

    And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and the strategies of all other peoples, so that we can protect ourselves from future Astrologies, Numerologies, theologies, rationalisms, and pseudosciences. And by the same means used in science.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:33:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703750379622400

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

  • Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDon

    Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:32:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previous (all of which have led to conflicts) is that we are exiting it now, and have been since sometime around 1990 – and we have been locally influenced whereas previous events have been at arms length.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previous (all of which have led to conflicts) is that we are exiting it now, and have been since sometime around 1990 – and we have been locally influenced whereas previous events have been at arms length.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600

  • I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions

    I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions. The only difference was that I was trying to understand western group evolutionary strategy, and why it was unarticulated in a canon other than our common law. Fukuyama partly satisfies it. @TOOEdit

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:27:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702103100248064

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Most of the time I’ve torn apart the author so heavily by the first 1500 words that continuation is pointless. In this case just the first three sentences are … less than amateurish. Macdonad’s only weakness was in specializing in one stategy rather than comparative strategies

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Most of the time I’ve torn apart the author so heavily by the first 1500 words that continuation is pointless. In this case just the first three sentences are … less than amateurish. Macdonad’s only weakness was in specializing in one stategy rather than comparative strategies

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522

  • East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(h

    East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(harmony) and non-imposition against the dominance hierarchy, but they failed to solve the problem of politics, and still practice face and continuous deception. It is very hard to compare us.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:18:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973624260051816448

    Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

  • Um. this is far too long a conversation, but you are using too few axis of causa

    Um. this is far too long a conversation, but you are using too few axis of causality. East asians are a low trust people. We are not yet sure why they are low trust. But it is most likely because their first philosopher ( their SunTzu) advocated delay and deceive.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:17:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973624005520486400

    Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376

  • It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that s

    It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:57:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973619089620037632

    Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:51:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973617596191866881

    Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest. The way to domesticate a human animal is no different from any other. Overtake its dominance hierarchy and cull impulsivity and aggression. This turns out to produce neotenic trait expression, prolongation of maturation, and general decline in testosterone (and many other things) It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase