Theme: Ethnoculture

  • ¿A que nos referimos cuando decimos “ética de guetos”?

    La ética del gueto rothbardiana es la ética de un gueto urbano medieval. No es más ni menos que eso Los residentes de un “estado dentro de un estado” pueden conducir intercambios como si fueran actores estatales al respaldarse y apalancarse sobre intercambios y transacciones de alta confianza intra-grupos, toda vez que usan intercambios y transacciones de baja confianza ex-grupo (fuera del grupo). Sin embargo, en cualquier estado, cada uno de nosotros no puede actuar como un “estado” al aplicar la baja confianza con unos y relaciones de alta confianza con otros porque el resultado neto es una sociedad de baja confianza con altísimos incentivos para robar para la gran mayoría. En tales ambientes, la demanda que hay para la existencia del estado y que este intervenga como ente que resuelva disputas entre miembros de la sociedad como sustituto permanece alta, ya que la baja confianza es el uso de la astucia y el engaño para obtener descuentos y primas en las que una de las partes involucradas en el intercambio/transacción no toleraría de forma voluntaria. Dicho de otra forma, la ética de la baja confianza es parasitaria, e impone altos costos de transacción sobre la población. A lo que voy con esto es lo absurdo de usar un modelo de un estado dentro de un estado para abogar por una sociedad en la que el estado no existe. En esa óptica, todo la tesis Rothbardiana es ridículamente ilógica. La aristocracia suprime todas las formas en las que se puede hacer trampa de modo tal que la demanda para la existencia del estado sea baja porque los costos de las transacciones y los conflictos que puedan surgir de estas son minimizados toda vez que la velocidad en la que la producción se da y el intercambio que ésta genera es alto.

  • we’re the most trusting, but we have the most reason to trust. You can easily de

    we’re the most trusting, but we have the most reason to trust.
    You can easily decompose the other trust groups by ingroup-outroup, median iq, and familialism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 20:07:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974014231149457410

    Reply addressees: @h_pufnstuf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974003464614400000


    IN REPLY TO:

    @h_pufnstuf

    @curtdoolittle Are these mutually exclusive categories? Wondering, for the religious and raised religious categories, which religion? Does this tell us that whites are the most trusting?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974003464614400000

  • @sonshi_com Before the world market adapted, we had to take classes in negotiati

    @sonshi_com Before the world market adapted, we had to take classes in negotiating with chinese because truth was such an alien concept. Indians didn’t so much lie as not understand the very concept of contractual truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:38:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973991747385733121

  • @sonshi_com The Russians for example are among the lowest trust peoples in repor

    @sonshi_com The Russians for example are among the lowest trust peoples in reported trust, but watch what happens if there is an accident, or theft, or violence in a russian city vs a chinese, or god forbid, southeast asian city.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973991410532790290

  • I didn’t say anything about low income. 😉 I didn’t mention asymmetry but I coul

    I didn’t say anything about low income. 😉 I didn’t mention asymmetry but I could have. Small homogenous extended kin groups that have practiced manorial eugenics have extraordinary interpersonal trust. the opposite produces the opposite (american trust has been declining).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:20:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973987161216299017

    Reply addressees: @sonshi_com

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973986515637428224


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973986515637428224

  • Homogeneity increases all trust, diversity decreases all trust. As a general rul

    Homogeneity increases all trust, diversity decreases all trust. As a general rul

    Homogeneity increases all trust, diversity decreases all trust.
    As a general rule, the size and duration of the middle class determines the trust level because it is commercial society that incentivizes it. https://t.co/5ZMiw6CiBv


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:10:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973984816294133760

    Reply addressees: @sonshi_com @rockyandmayur

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273

  • No. We Make No Apologies For Disruption Of Your Status Quo’s

    —‘talents’ being the will to take others property, land and commit genocide?”— Kool Akiem (Regarding: “europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy and no one else did.”) REPLY Talents meaning personality traits including intelligence, and in particular verbal intelligence, but even more so on general pedomorphcih and neotonic prolongation of traits. I am terribly proud of dragging humanity out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering and disease even if they resisted us all the way, and succeeded in defeating us by the great lies of the Abrahamic Dark Age. And even if they are resisting us today in the beginning of the second abrahamic (pseudoscientific) dark age by exactly the same means. I am terribly proud of replacing the undomesticated animal, and domesticating the human animals that remain. You are not kin, friend, productive cooperator, political cooperator, or military cooperator and I would prefer to continue speciating and leaving peoples like you behind as we have done so for millennia. If we cannot cooperate on ends, that is fine, as long as we can cooperate on means. If we cannot cooperate on means, then you are either unimportant, a competitor for resources, a parasite, or an enemy. There is no family of man except in the mind of parasites. I mean, the greatest murderers in the world are the islamists (500M dead, and the Socialist/Communists 100M dead) yet we have dragged mankind out of ignorance in the ancient and modern world, with the only interruption being the abrahamic dark age imposed upon europe by eastern emperors followed by muslim pirates and raiders. I mean, we destroyed south american civilizations nearly by accident. In the modern world we ahve tried desperately to turn primitive semi domesticated animals into fully human participants in the market order. And had the british not fallen to immoral influence under Disraeli, they might have completed the task by administration rather than leaving it to americans to force others to do at the point of high powered weapons. The muslims destroyed every major civilization in the ancient world, and the soviets cost eastern europe two hundred years. The east and southeast asians killed so many of their own people that only the muslims and the great plagues compare. Your anxiety is that you have very low sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and as such you rail against a world you are unfit for. It is understandable that you should rail against a sexual,s ocial, economic, political and military order that forces you to confront your low market value to others. However, It is in the interests of all mankind past and present that if you lack sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, that you disappear from the gene pool so that you do not force others to pay the cost of your inadequacy. We all fear being left behind. I wish I was tall enough to play basketball – I would have greater access to better women. I wish often that I had ordinary intelligence rather than the extremes – it would make life more pleasant. I wish that I had been born in a prior generation of my family when it was much wealthier than others, rather than in a generation equal to others. But I compete. I win. I make a place where I can create value. I don’t rail against the world to justify my lack of ability, character, and fortitude.   Cheers
  • NO. WE MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR DISRUPTION OF YOUR STATUS QUO’S —‘talents’ being

    NO. WE MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR DISRUPTION OF YOUR STATUS QUO’S

    —‘talents’ being the will to take others property, land and commit genocide?”— Kool Akiem

    (Regarding: “europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy and no one else did.”)

    REPLY

    Talents meaning personality traits including intelligence, and in particular verbal intelligence, but even more so on general pedomorphcih and neotonic prolongation of traits.

    I am terribly proud of dragging humanity out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering and disease even if they resisted us all the way, and succeeded in defeating us by the great lies of the Abrahamic Dark Age. And even if they are resisting us today in the beginning of the second abrahamic (pseudoscientific) dark age by exactly the same means.

    I am terribly proud of replacing the undomesticated animal, and domesticating the human animals that remain.

    You are not kin, friend, productive cooperator, political cooperator, or military cooperator and I would prefer to continue speciating and leaving peoples like you behind as we have done so for millennia.

    If we cannot cooperate on ends, that is fine, as long as we can cooperate on means. If we cannot cooperate on means, then you are either unimportant, a competitor for resources, a parasite, or an enemy.

    There is no family of man except in the mind of parasites.

    I mean, the greatest murderers in the world are the islamists (500M dead, and the Socialist/Communists 100M dead) yet we have dragged mankind out of ignorance in the ancient and modern world, with the only interruption being the abrahamic dark age imposed upon europe by eastern emperors followed by muslim pirates and raiders.

    I mean, we destroyed south american civilizations nearly by accident. In the modern world we ahve tried desperately to turn primitive semi domesticated animals into fully human participants in the market order. And had the british not fallen to immoral influence under Disraeli, they might have completed the task by administration rather than leaving it to americans to force others to do at the point of high powered weapons. The muslims destroyed every major civilization in the ancient world, and the soviets cost eastern europe two hundred years. The east and southeast asians killed so many of their own people that only the muslims and the great plagues compare.

    Your anxiety is that you have very low sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and as such you rail against a world you are unfit for. It is understandable that you should rail against a sexual,s ocial, economic, political and military order that forces you to confront your low market value to others. However, It is in the interests of all mankind past and present that if you lack sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, that you disappear from the gene pool so that you do not force others to pay the cost of your inadequacy.

    We all fear being left behind. I wish I was tall enough to play basketball – I would have greater access to better women. I wish often that I had ordinary intelligence rather than the extremes – it would make life more pleasant. I wish that I had been born in a prior generation of my family when it was much wealthier than others, rather than in a generation equal to others.

    But I compete. I win. I make a place where I can create value.

    I don’t rail against the world to justify my lack of ability, character, and fortitude.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 12:28:00 UTC

  • No. We Make No Apologies For Disruption Of Your Status Quo’s

    —‘talents’ being the will to take others property, land and commit genocide?”— Kool Akiem (Regarding: “europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy and no one else did.”) REPLY Talents meaning personality traits including intelligence, and in particular verbal intelligence, but even more so on general pedomorphcih and neotonic prolongation of traits. I am terribly proud of dragging humanity out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering and disease even if they resisted us all the way, and succeeded in defeating us by the great lies of the Abrahamic Dark Age. And even if they are resisting us today in the beginning of the second abrahamic (pseudoscientific) dark age by exactly the same means. I am terribly proud of replacing the undomesticated animal, and domesticating the human animals that remain. You are not kin, friend, productive cooperator, political cooperator, or military cooperator and I would prefer to continue speciating and leaving peoples like you behind as we have done so for millennia. If we cannot cooperate on ends, that is fine, as long as we can cooperate on means. If we cannot cooperate on means, then you are either unimportant, a competitor for resources, a parasite, or an enemy. There is no family of man except in the mind of parasites. I mean, the greatest murderers in the world are the islamists (500M dead, and the Socialist/Communists 100M dead) yet we have dragged mankind out of ignorance in the ancient and modern world, with the only interruption being the abrahamic dark age imposed upon europe by eastern emperors followed by muslim pirates and raiders. I mean, we destroyed south american civilizations nearly by accident. In the modern world we ahve tried desperately to turn primitive semi domesticated animals into fully human participants in the market order. And had the british not fallen to immoral influence under Disraeli, they might have completed the task by administration rather than leaving it to americans to force others to do at the point of high powered weapons. The muslims destroyed every major civilization in the ancient world, and the soviets cost eastern europe two hundred years. The east and southeast asians killed so many of their own people that only the muslims and the great plagues compare. Your anxiety is that you have very low sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and as such you rail against a world you are unfit for. It is understandable that you should rail against a sexual,s ocial, economic, political and military order that forces you to confront your low market value to others. However, It is in the interests of all mankind past and present that if you lack sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, that you disappear from the gene pool so that you do not force others to pay the cost of your inadequacy. We all fear being left behind. I wish I was tall enough to play basketball – I would have greater access to better women. I wish often that I had ordinary intelligence rather than the extremes – it would make life more pleasant. I wish that I had been born in a prior generation of my family when it was much wealthier than others, rather than in a generation equal to others. But I compete. I win. I make a place where I can create value. I don’t rail against the world to justify my lack of ability, character, and fortitude.   Cheers
  • “So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility the

    –“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’. Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible. Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them. As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did. All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating. That’s just how it is. So, no. All peoples can transcend.