photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54798309_10157069765892264_2578685990717620224_o_10157069765882264.jpg by Michael AbbottSvan HerulBut then you look at the people that cultivated all that into the left….and they are a majority of a certain race….Mar 26, 2019, 3:56 AMby Michael Abbott
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:56:00 UTC
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT … FRAMES OF PEOPLES
(important) (read this)
Continental vs Scandinavian vs Anglo thought, (vs Latin and Orthodox thought for that matter).
—“It’s just been a challenge suggesting to [Curt] that declarative constructs are not how morality is actually processed.”–Josh Jeppson
It’s not how it’s processed. I agree. Its however how it is CALCULATED.
(a) this is forever going to be a debate between occult semitic supernatural, the continental(german) phenomenalistic and the scientific (scandinavian) anglo, and as far as I know tells us nothing other than the amount of time under semitic (church) influence (rule) and the demand for obedience between island (scandinavian/athenian naval security), and territorial (germanic/spartan army vulnerability), or the imperial (Roman Anglo/Germanic-American power confidence)
(b) So the *demand* for Scientific Rules of Dispute resolution (American), Conformity of Values(Scandinavian), and Conformity of Thought value and deed (German), is determined by the environment for certain. By habituation (tradition) over time out of consequence. By genetics over longer time by rates of reproduction and eugenic suppression.
(c) And while we EVOLVE a system to satisfy that demand (cheap law of engineering, more expensive law of norms, and very expensive law of thought word and deed), the system of rules one implements need not be limited to the means under which it evolved, any more than reason, measurement (math) and science (testimony) need be limited to those who evolved it.
(d) My understanding is that one writes law (science) by calculation, one teaches norms (public experience) by imitation of rules, and one indoctrinates into thoughts (education) by parable. ie: Specific Formulae, General Rules, Loose Parables.
(e) we develop ‘values’ in response to internal trust and external security. These are adaptations. A russian, a Pole, an Italian, a Frenchman, a German, a Dane, an Anglo, an Australian, and an American develop values suited to our condition. However, we assumed these are CHOSEN, and we assume their method of communication must be non-rational. Neither is true.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:36:00 UTC
In Jewish Libertarian parlance, the State is a Euphemism for White People.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 09:07:00 UTC
by Nick Heywood
Society is a result of Similar DNA selecting each other for trust and likelihood of lessor cost reciprocity and productive cooperation than otherwise!
In other words?…. How likely is it that you, assuming you’re from a similar gene pool, are or will…
a. Advise me to act on falsehoods?
b. advise me to act on falsehoods you know to be false (Lie!)?
c. exchange resources as a result (with no warranty) (rip me off)?
d. just take my S (Theft)?
e. initiate violence if I refuse (Attempt to kill me)?
f. Complete or honour agreements?
g. Agree to 3rd party, empirical (Scientific method and competent authority) judgement in the event of dispute?
h. our reciprocity and/or cooperation results in productivity improvements for you and I?
Compared to an unfamiliar, unknown, unsampled (blind faith) gene pool?
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 09:02:00 UTC
–“The only possible non-suicidal response to nonwhite ID politics is white ID politics.”—John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 14:02:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109093047026024448
“Blood not mud”
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 13:33:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109085627365105664
PROPERTARIANISM AS THIRD POSITION
by Alain Dwight
The difference with P is that it provides s a “3rd position,” it reveals the value of identity politics and higher tribalism without being blinded by tribalism or identity politics.
The question is always in defining the limits: when is a given line of thought beneficial and at what point does it become detrimental?
Healthy identity politics is the equivalent of loving your family.
That is very far from necessitating hatred or vandalization of other families and their identities. In fact, it can serve as a platform for mutual respect.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156490708142264
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 10:45:00 UTC
–“The only possible non-suicidal response to nonwhite ID politics is white ID politics.”—John Mark
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 10:02:00 UTC
“Blood not mud”
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 09:32:00 UTC
—“A Senegalese bus driver in Italy tried to burn 52 children to death today. Had he pulled it off, I think it would have been the final straw.”–Greg Hamilton
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 00:26:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108887606228508672