Theme: Ethnoculture

  • HOW USEFUL IS ETHNOCENTRISM AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN? —“Dear Curt, You write pret

    HOW USEFUL IS ETHNOCENTRISM AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

    —“Dear Curt, You write pretty regularly about Anglo, French, German, Russian, Spanish etc ethnic characteristics. In the United States, how useful is this kind of ethnocentrism? Is it relevant that Caesar revered the Macedonian Alexander, and that Alexander revered Greeks like Achilles, and Diogenes? I also remember Caesar passed through a tiny, poverty stricken Gallic village and said, “I’d rather be first in this village than second in Rome.” Is this “ethnocentrism”?”—

    ANSWER:

    (in progress)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 10:16:00 UTC

  • ETHNOCENTRISM IS THE OPTIMUM GROUP STRATEGY… Ethnocentrism is the optimum grou

    ETHNOCENTRISM IS THE OPTIMUM GROUP STRATEGY…

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy however it is in competition with the need for scale, hence the continuous conflict and decline in the tribal middle east, while slow evolution in india, faster in china, and fastest in europe. Only one civilization failed.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 07:45:00 UTC

  • MUST READ by Luke Weinhagen Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity In much the same way co

    MUST READ

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity

    In much the same way common biological markers are a shortcut to trust (represent a reduction in costs) common aesthetic markers as a shortcut to trust. Shared aesthetic signals “I am one of you” like shared biology does. Aesthetic, in this context, is the projection of or our kinship onto our environment and behavior.

    Consumption of the aesthetic produces an externalization of costs onto the development of common trust.

    Globalist Capitalism discounts the aesthetic.

    – It tears down the historic church to put up an Amazon distribution center.

    – It sends the work to India instead of Indiana.

    – It ignores full-accounting to limit trade to material value.

    – It denies the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – It dissolves the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Globalist Capitalism consumes our trust, and it does so at a deep discount.

    (because the aesthetic is not common between parties under globalism, aesthetic can not be valued into trade – globalist capitalism has to deny/prevent/ignore full-accounting)

    Kinship Capitalism includes the demand for full-accounting that includes the value of the aesthetic.

    – It prevents the destruction of our history and demands restitution when that history is damaged.

    – It puts the burden of extra costs on the outsider bring business into the kinship.

    – It demands the value of a resource be measured by the cost of its loss to the community as well as any material value

    – It promotes and preserves the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – Is secures the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Kinship Capitalism preserves our trust, and insures our interactions to continue to increase that trust.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 11:45:00 UTC

  • If you make everything a race issue you can’t exit the undesirable members of yo

    If you make everything a race issue you can’t exit the undesirable members of your own group. If you make it about everything else, only your group, and members of desirable groups, will want to join. Think sh-t thru. Use incentives. Use incentives to achieve your ends. Simple is only good for advertising. Strategy is not advertising. It’s a goal. Everything else is a step toward a goal achieved by creating opportunities and seizing others opportunistically.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 19:41:00 UTC

  • What made America great was Anglo Saxon absolutism under the promise of universa

    What made America great was Anglo Saxon absolutism under the promise of universal middle class. Period. What has destroyed America is Semitic undermining by the false promise of equality.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 19:31:00 UTC

  • “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”

    “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 18:22:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220049133752504320

  • “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”

    “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 13:22:00 UTC

  • So, the strategy for the Right is to enumerate a set of ‘rights’ and demonstrate

    So, the strategy for the Right is to enumerate a set of ‘rights’ and demonstrate to demand our ‘rights’ including the right to self determination, the preservation of our culture, traditions, institutions, language, religion.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 10:49:00 UTC

  • DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE Please don’t waste my time. Fi

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE

    Please don’t waste my time. Find the data. Human behavior is 80% inherited and 20% idiosyncratic development of behavior. Races differ in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=558186324778262&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 19:54:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218985214883565569

  • WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!! by Göran Dahl Up until very recently,

    WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!!

    by Göran Dahl

    Up until very recently, it was thought that Eastern Europeans (in the form of Poles, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians and Balts) were the genetically closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and, indeed, to Proto-Indo-Europeans. However, it appears that these ethnic groups had ever so slightly inflated Steppe ancestry percentages due to having higher levels of so-called Narva_HG admixture. Narva_HG belongs to the Mesolithic Narva culture, whose members were a mixture of EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer) and WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherer).

    Today, we can say that the people closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and Proto-Indo-Europeans in terms of genetic distance (and Steppe ancestry) are Norwegians, Irishmen and Icelanders; the latter due to being a composite of the two former. Irishmen tend to be the closest fit for typical Proto-Indo-Iranian cultures such as Srubnaya and Sintashta, whereas Norwegians are the closest to Yamnaya_Kalmykia (a subset of Yamnaya) and Potapovka, which is thought to be ancestral to the forementioned Srubnaya.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:33:00 UTC