Theme: Ethnoculture

  • ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY —

    ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY

    —“Early European Farmers did come from Anatolia originally. But their population, Barcin_N or ANF, was basal to both Europeans and certain Mesopotamians, the latter receiving the gene flow much later than the former. This means that the “Neolithic toolkit” that entered Europe was independent of Mesopotamian influence (Mesos had their own source). Modern Assyrians, who are probably closest to ancient Akkadians, have around 30% ANF, and most North Europeans (North mind you) score even higher than that. It just comes to show how limited the ANF exposure was in the Middle East despite their relative proximity.”—Göran Dahl


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:32:00 UTC

  • PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL ST

    PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL STATE

    –“Anglos were against germans”–

    I disagree entirely. America prewar was 50% ethnically german and the heartland still is. America was on the german side in both wars until it couldn’t afford to be. Before 1914, Germany (manufacturing) and England (navy, market) had the same economic interdependency as china(manufacturing) and America (navy, market).

    The British empire wanted, as America until Trump has wanted, to restore the balance of powers – including the Russians and the ottomans. Otherwise they would not have prohibited the Russian reconquest of Istanbul, or the restoration of the german empire post napoleonic conquest. This is the problem with ‘overdoing’ capitalism (middle class government): we seek profits and stability of profits because of the expansion of economic risk under middle class government, when we should always seek the natural self interest of the great powers, and only interfere once the outcome is far enough along that we can choose sides – as we did by going after the communists.

    I would argue that yes, the British were swayed to jewish extractive financialism instead of Christian profiting from domestication under white mans burden, after ending the prohibition on jews in the state, and the rise of Disraeli’s government. The British problem with Germany was that in response to napoleon’s terrors in Europe, Germany unified, and began to defend her (huge) continental interests.

    Had we sided with Germany the empires would all still exist and the world would not have experienced communism, the failure to Complete the colonial program of world-modernization, loss of european confidence in the european program post war, jewish undermining of european, British, and american civilization post war, the immigration crisis that has almost achieved jewish cosmopolitan ends, and the coming civil war – and islam could have been transformed, because tribal boundaries would have been possible to install.

    The mistake was our misunderstanding of the heart of german civilization being in the north and particularly Prussian – but the french post-war wanted to ‘de-Prussify’ Germany by manipulating american morality (we’re wrong), and making it possible for France to conquer and rule the continent (as they are trying to do with the EU).

    Unfortunately, France chose more socialism and agrarianism than Germany, and Germany chose her traditional excellence in manufacturing, so between the german mark and german industry and german education and german culture, Germany economically rules by demonstrated superiority …. until …. there is a decline in auto sales … and germans revolt at a loss of (everything) and she re-asserts herself in defense, and they are stuck with France having confidence and the will to rule Europe, and Germans needing to restore their will to rule themselves and Europe.

    Yet it is France that maintains colonies in Africa, and is the origin of Jewish intellectual influence, and Muslim immigration and invasion into Europe.

    France has always been the enemy of Europe since she was more latinized and retained imperial ambitions and catholic church dominance, including her long standing attempt to relocate the papacy to France.

    It’s the Germanics that have tried to complete the transition back to SOVEREIGNTY while France continues the jewish christian (catholic) pursuit of monopoly authority.

    The countryside may be germanic. but France is Paris, and Paris might as well be Constantinople trying to conquer the western empire.

    Russia is, as I had hoped, taking over her natural position as the leader in the middle eastern sphere of influence.

    France is, as I had warned, still attempting her conquest of Europe and the destruction of germanic civilization – out of overconfidence and arrogance (both unwarranted).

    Germany is still indoctrinated by what they call their (special history) except they were in the right and need a generation to unlearn blaming themselves for what was a french, anglo, and Russian attack on their attempt to unify the germanic peoples and the lands which germanic excellence had influenced.

    If Germany gains independence and restores herself, then the slavic and baltic peoples will strategically, economically, align with them.

    The Anglosphere has time to unify again, draw ‘the rest’ of Canada into it’s sphere, and prevent the conquest of Australia by Chinese interests, thereby creating *enough* of a population to not be the victim of a hostile china, a powerful Russia-Islam, an islam, and a hostile french conquest of Europe.

    The balkans are screwed until the Russians or united eastern european Intermarium can save them by completing the removal of islam from old europe as thoroughly as the spanish have from iberia.

    These are not simple moral choices. They are choices necessary for western survival.

    All of this is made possible (a) by Brexit and (b) by american Red-Exit … or re-conquest. The latter I hope we will begin this year.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • “[a roman general said european barbarians were …]– Some Poor Fool That Studi

    —“[a roman general said european barbarians were …]– Some Poor Fool That Studied Critical Theory (Jewish Pseudoscientific Theology)

    And …. you’re forgetting that the same roman general, the greek equivalent, the thousands of european chieftains and warriors that proceeded them were all europeans practicing indo european languages, european religions, and the group evolutionary strategy of european peoples.

    I am quite sure I have read more than you have, and that i’ve read more science economics and law than you have. When you read literature it’s the slow version of thought, history a bit faster, economics, law a bit faster, science a bit faster, and mathematics the fastest. The paradigm (grammar) that you read tells us everything about your abilities and susceptibility to error. Error increases rapidly as we depart from economics, and if you read opinion you’re just reading fiction. And you read ‘fiction’. 😉 I read fact.

    And, well, you know, you are making a number of rather sophomoric errors here:

    (a) all peoples develop similar norms given their states of development – because a primitive people practice cannibalism doesn’t tell us much other than their state of development.

    (b) all peoples develop some grammar of arguing and persisting their group strategy in their environment, and strangely enough this strategy doesn’t change much over the centuries.

    (c) That grammar (logic) varies from european science, to chinese wisdom, to hindu myth, to greek (platonic) idealism, to abrahamic critique and deceit by supernaturalism pseudoscience and sophism , to african magic.

    (d) that strategy varies from european productivity, to chinese harmony, to hindu castes, to semitic parasitism, to gypsy petty parasitism, to the endemic interpredation of een more primitive peoples.

    (e) the consequence of those strategies and grammars results in vast differences in consequences.

    (f) europeans have practiced soverignty, testimony, jury, law, and materialism (because of metallugy) of some sort since the beginning of the Indo European expansion.

    (g) hindsight is a sophism. moral equivalency across time is a sophism and a deceit. Islam christianity and judaism are a cancer on this earth.

    So, those very basic roots a civilization lays grow trees then forests of dependent ideas behaviors and results.

    Every civlization has erred. West african civilization was just about to enter it’s consolidation phase and the european age of sail had the same effect on west africa as it did on spain and portugal: it created a misallocation of capital by making greater profit from slave trading by africans than by empire construction; greater profit from slave trading and gold import, and conquest by spanish and portugese that was directed to wars of conquest rather than national improvement. And the british lucked out because their focus on commercial development, trade, and colonization instead of slave trading and gold importing, had longer institutional and civilizational consequences – even if, the small percentage of slaves in the USA led to our civil war, our near civil war in the 1960s and the civil war we will likely have shortly.

    You see what happens when you study science, economics and law instead of literature? You discover that the group strategy of a people, the language and wisdom literature of a people that they persist that strategy with, and the organization of the people by military, commercial, theological, or ‘corruption’ determine everything that happens to them – and everything they do – becaues people do what they can in the circumstances with the knowledge that they have.

    And by and large european and east asian civilizations practiced better group strategies, better wisdom literatures, and better EUGENICS than did the people who cannot keep up with them.

    The rest is just ‘noise’ as knowledge and trade work their way through populations and spread across land masses and seas.

    I am very, very good at what I do. And while we all make mistakes I very rarely make errors.

    You will find very few public intellectuals like me who grant access to ordinary people.

    Use it wisely and learn something.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 09:52:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY Its easy to be a European Supremacist on

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY

    Its easy to be a European Supremacist on the evidence – but european supremacy is due to thousands of years of the european group strategy of entrepreneurial warfare, heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and the commons of markets, reason, empiricism, science, medicine, technology, history, literature, and arts that results from it. But Superiority among europeans has taught us that trying to domesticate others directly doesn’t work. We can only do it by export. Our cost of conquest and rule is too high. (Even if conquest and eradication isn’t)

    Superiority among Ashkenazi hasn’t taught them much at all – hence the lack of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and all the commons that result from it. Instead we have the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, justified by pilpul defended by critique and GSRRM, unwarrantied, and obfuscated by claims of plausible deniability under the claim of the victim’s volition, and the worlds most harmful lies created using that Abrahamic method of deceit: judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, cultural marxism, feminism, postmodernism, political correctness, propaganda, and financialism and denialism in the modern world.

    However, history has a long record of Chinese supremacy in no small part because of the luxury of their fertile river valleys and geographic isolation, by mountains, desert, arctic, and oceans, and relatively homogeneous genetics prohibiting the conflicts of un-isolated fertile crescent peoples. They were able to organize and create a bureaucracy early, and continuously progress – albeit much more slowly that the west. And they are demonstrating once again that national and civilizational self interest will defeat semitic religious monopoly universalism, and european market universalism.

    The future is determined by whether the anglosphere can re-unite, and the indians, chinese, are successful in reversing islamic conquest, and the europeans, north and south americans and africans prevent it.

    China is a fascist (nationalist) state and it has set the tempo for the 21st and 22nd centuries because it is the most competitive strategy a political order can adopt – and none can defeat that strategy over time.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:33:00 UTC

  • Again, joke as we may, the christian destruction of the ancient world, the jewis

    Again, joke as we may, the christian destruction of the ancient world, the jewish and now muslim destruction of the modern world. Why is it don’t we separate? https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1222736619003768832

  • Randomly pick a dozen books by the best ashkenazim and europeans. Compare their

    Randomly pick a dozen books by the best ashkenazim and europeans. Compare their spoken vs written words. The ashkenazi have excelled in female cognitive dimorphism. The europeans have excelled in male cognitive dimorphism. Articulation-verbal vs Invention-existential (material)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 23:50:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030713034907649

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223019179407814657


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223019179407814657

  • THE WEST IS UNIQUE, AND ITS GENETIC by Tom Creo Prof Robert Plomin, best behavio

    THE WEST IS UNIQUE, AND ITS GENETIC

    by Tom Creo

    Prof Robert Plomin, best behavioral and population geneticist on the planet, summarises 40 years of behavioral and population genetics in his wonderful book “Blueprint” last year. Despite being a massive leftist he states that it is definitive that, in the West at least, it is genetics that makes us who we are and that the environmental contributions to each of us are random noise; unknowable, unpredictable, and uncontrollable in principle. There are essentially no systemic or institutional environmental effects on individual’s in the West. If there was this research would have found it by now – and as we all know leftist geneticists are highly ideologically incentivised to look for it. Genetics is indeed all that matters.



    CD: we’re superior in what we do (invent). That does not mean we cannot be defeated.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 21:45:00 UTC

  • THE DAM BREAKS – WHAT TO READ: 1. Charles Murray’s Human Diversity 2. Kevin MacD

    THE DAM BREAKS – WHAT TO READ:
    1. Charles Murray’s Human Diversity
    2. Kevin MacDonald’s Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition (It Sovereignty KM, not Individualism)
    3. David Reich’s Who We Are and How We Got Here.

    And of course Propertarianism that explains it all. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 16:44:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222923457500938254

  • CONQUEROR > SETTLER > IMMIGRANT > REFUGEE > INVADER by Thomas Beesley‎ CONQUEROR

    CONQUEROR > SETTLER > IMMIGRANT > REFUGEE > INVADER

    by Thomas Beesley‎

    CONQUEROR: Somebody who risks life and limb to domesticate a primitive territory and people by creating a market order, by the organized application of violence.

    SETTLER: somebody who comes when there is nothing, and builds a civilization from it. A pioneer, an adventurer, a conqueror. Productivity, masculinity, ingenuity, fierce independence. Patrician founders, their heirs the rightful inheritors of the nation and a portion of all of the fruits of it’s production by right of establishment.

    IMMIGRANT: somebody who comes over long after the work of establishing and building of the civilization has ended and merely reaps the rewards of those who came before. A plebian underclass by nature, at best a person simply looking for opportunity, at worst a parasite looking for a host. Interlopers, opportunists, traveling merchants, unwelcome guests who readily make themselves at home.

    My ancestors were not immigrants. They were conquerors and settlers. And they left me and mine our inheritance.

    And I am willing to fight to defend that inheritance.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 10:47:00 UTC

  • Again. Correct. So can you please stop arguing against the obvious? Race > Relig

    Again. Correct. So can you please stop arguing against the obvious? Race > Religion > Civilization > Ethnicity > Polity > Class > Gender https://twitter.com/gnxp_posts/status/1217713352782139392