Theme: Ethnoculture

  • How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess

    How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/how-did-the-uk-end-up-to-be-a-multicultural-root-less-anti-white-mess-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:15:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265844200903446529

  • How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess

    May 20, 2020, 2:16 PM

    —“In your view, how did the UK end up to be a multicultural root-less anti white mess that it is now? How did the police become increasingly militarized?”— Joshua Shalet

    1) The socialists were more effective postwar than here because the UK was destroyed by her ‘ahem’ civli war to prevent germany from taking over europe (as she traditionally had and western civlization needed her to. france has always been the enemy of europe.). 2) they failed to shrink the state in response to the loss of empire. 3) They were financially dependent on london in ways the USA is not. And they loved all the free money flowing in from europe by being ‘the other switzerland’. 4) They failed to control immigration into london and are now prisoners of it. We can shut down a NYC because any other major city can pick up the slack. But they can’t shut down london because they haven’t a backup. same for france. not the same for usa, canada, australia, germany or russia. 5) Brits don’t have ‘rights’ like Americans and the parliament can modify the constitution whereas the people have to modify the american constitution. 6) They don’t have sheriffs to compete with the police, they don’t have governors to compete with the federal government, the people don’t have rights to sue the government like we do in the states. And that’s just off the top of my head. ( The fact that the British working class is … a bunch of p—ies, addicted to milking the state… well, you know. )

  • How Did the Uk End up To Be a Multicultural Root-Less Anti White Mess

    May 20, 2020, 2:16 PM

    —“In your view, how did the UK end up to be a multicultural root-less anti white mess that it is now? How did the police become increasingly militarized?”— Joshua Shalet

    1) The socialists were more effective postwar than here because the UK was destroyed by her ‘ahem’ civli war to prevent germany from taking over europe (as she traditionally had and western civlization needed her to. france has always been the enemy of europe.). 2) they failed to shrink the state in response to the loss of empire. 3) They were financially dependent on london in ways the USA is not. And they loved all the free money flowing in from europe by being ‘the other switzerland’. 4) They failed to control immigration into london and are now prisoners of it. We can shut down a NYC because any other major city can pick up the slack. But they can’t shut down london because they haven’t a backup. same for france. not the same for usa, canada, australia, germany or russia. 5) Brits don’t have ‘rights’ like Americans and the parliament can modify the constitution whereas the people have to modify the american constitution. 6) They don’t have sheriffs to compete with the police, they don’t have governors to compete with the federal government, the people don’t have rights to sue the government like we do in the states. And that’s just off the top of my head. ( The fact that the British working class is … a bunch of p—ies, addicted to milking the state… well, you know. )

  • The Compromise Between Europeans and Christians Is the Same as Between Men and W

    The Compromise Between Europeans and Christians Is the Same as Between Men and Women: A Trade https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-compromise-between-europeans-and-christians-is-the-same-as-between-men-and-women-a-trade-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:06:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265841913770520577

  • The Compromise Between Europeans and Christians Is the Same as Between Men and Women: A Trade

    May 24, 2020, 10:09 AM

    —-“Stop your Nietzscheanism. At least Christianity allows for forgiveness and cancel culture don’t. “We are all sinners,” don’t forget that.”—Haniel @HanielAzzi

    Cancel Culture (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and difference-denialism) are just christianity v2: undermining meritocracy, reason, evidence, and testimony by replacing the false promise of life after death with the false promise of equality after replacement. Cancel culture is just the strategy of women to undermine, just as christianity is the strategy of women to create social constructions. This is because women are fearful because their bodies evolved to supply fetuses rather then muscles and speed, they’re nervous systems evolved to include their offspring, and verbal ability a discount on manipulating children. And because of these adaptations they’re physically weaker, and emotionally neurotic, but verbally superior, and so they compete as they can by manipulation, using the positive range of seductions: feeding, caring, nurturing, and informing, and the negative spectrum of disinformations: approval and disapproval vs truth or falsehood, half truth vs complete truth, undermining vs debate, resistance and advocacy vs boycott and cooperation, short term devotion vs persistent loyalty. There are no gods, no heaven, no sins. Only myth, evolution, and crimes. Crimes of violating physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by acts of irreciprocity in display, word, or deed, that resist our evolution into the gods we imagined by truth, science, technology and markets. We are the only gods that may yet be. And in the test of civilizations, only western man discovered the laws of the universe and adapted their civilization to mirror them. If there were gods, europeans would be the chosen people, Aristotle their prophet, and truth their scripture. Christianity is the religion of false promise, ignorance, deceit, manipulation, en-serfment, poverty, and the dark ages, that asks women, slaves, and the weak, to submit to a false god, of an alien people, who produced nothing except lies, usury, rent seeking, and organized crime. Simple people need lies and social construction to reinforce them against insecurities, worries, stresses, slights, signaling, and status pressures in order to sedate their neuroticism from the pressures of low status and low agency – providing the illusion of understanding and control. It is sufficient for them, just as fairy tales are for children. To say we all need mindfulness: personal, interpersonal, social, political, and metaphysical is nothing more than to state we need to limit the cost of a neural economy frustrated by incalculability of status in the chaos outside the life of the hunting-gathering tribe. To say that pagan ‘religion’, aryan, stoic, epicurean values solved the problem of masculine religions, but did not solve the problem of feminine religion (traditional religion of the hearth), is simply to note that Rome expanded into old poor, majority underclass, semitic civilization without first solving the problem of producing a religion of women, slaves, and underclasses – is simply to say that we grew too fast under aryanism in the ancient world just as we are growing too fast under aryanism in the modern world – and that rates of adaptation reflect confidence, agency(conscientiousness), intelligence, and neuroticism – which is what separates the genders and classes. In a rapidly evolving commercial empire under Western Rome, and a collapsing commercial empire under Eastern Byzantium, Christianity provided women, slaves, and the underclasses a means of obtaining self-worth, and status by demanding reciprocal behavior despite their lack of physical, emotional, mental, social, economic, political agency. Monotheism is the religion of the herd not yet human. But the enduring values of our civlization are not semitic christian – they’re four thousand years old, first captured in writing by the Greeks: Excellence and Beauty, Heroism and Duty, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law, and resulting markets in everything as the only means of survival: evolution. This set of values – despite that they were only metaphysical, traditional, and institutional, functioned as the operating principle for western civilization that produced the fastest innovation and adaptation possible by man, and dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering and early death. The restoration of Aristotelian thought, northern and Atlantic trade, the contractualism that trade demanded, the printing and literacy that resulted, re-harmonized our scholarly thought with our social, commercial, legal, and military thought restored european civilization. The 20th century false promises are just the second attempt to destroy western civlization from within – by marxism neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human difference denialism – planted the fertile minds already accustomed to false promise as escape from reality. The dirty secret of western civlization, is that the martial aristocracy created western civilization by profiting from the incremental domestication man like they domesticated animals, using incremental slavery, serfdom, freedom, citizenship, and sovereignty to produce equals. And the failure of the British Experiment of an Aristocracy of Everyone, was caused in the modern world as it was in the ancient by over extension of the franchise to those peoples insufficiently genetically pacified by western values, to survive persist, and participate in them. So continuing our thousands of years of civilizational tradition, the aristocracy of the masculine who have agency in reality, agree to use our law of reciprocity, to trade loyalty with the priesthood of the feminine who lack agency in reality, to persist our civilization. Because we all prioritize the pagan(aryan/martial), heathen(ancestor/nature), Aristotelian (masculine/scientific), secular humanist (feminine), christian (feminine) differently. And given each of us varies on the spectrum between the feminine and masculine mind, we prioritize our systems of calculating (faiths), according to our genetic needs. But as long as we hold to our ancestral law of oath, contract, reciprocity, jury, markets we survive, prosper, and evolve. And that is enough. And that is what I seek to achieve: the continued evolution of our tradition from informal traditional law, to rights of anglo saxons, to British constitution, to american constitution, to finally a ‘bible’ of western civilization written in the neutral language of our martial-dominant male, judicial-neutral, priestly-feminine Trifunctionalism: the Natural Law of Reciprocity. And our continued evolution into the gods we imagined.

  • Germanic Spirituality

    Oct 8, 2019, 8:17 PM

    —“Also, Curt Doolittle, what do you recommend for a non-Christian theist looking to delve into Germanic spirituality/theology? There are very few good sources (I find many “pagans” to be cringe-inducing despite the fact that I consider myself to be a “pagan”).”— Henry Harrison

    Shrines to nature, cemeteries for ancestors, and statues to heroes, and temples to our gods (archetypes). If I have to choose those archetypes I would choose a sacred site for odin(wisdom, knowledge, cunning, chaos, the vicissitude of nature), Tyr (Order, Law, Truth, leadership), and Thor (force, forces of nature, courage), and Freya (Fertility, love, beauty, beautiful things). Take note that there are no submissive relations to the gods. No archetypes of good and evil. Only the WILL OF MAN OVER ALL, gods included. I say this not because they are the best archetypes, but because they are the least bad – the least infected by the middle east. And the most ‘ours’. And that there isn’t much else known about them, so they they provoke a natural mystery rather than an artificial one. The mystery of our ancestors lost to us in anonymous time. And I have a thing for thanking the great men of history. Not some ideal substitute. And as many of them as possible. Aristotle, Michelangelo, Alexander, Aurelius, Washington and Jefferson, and hundreds more. Men with sh–t ancestors develop false ones they call gods. Those of us with great ancestors have no need of the false ones. Worship (thanks for our inheritance) is not for the gods. Its for you, and those that follow you, to continue to pay the debts, so that we continue to produce our lines, our culture, and our civilization. That is religion. The rest is therapy.

  • Western Man’s Uniqueness in Purpose: Raised to Rule

    Western Man’s Uniqueness in Purpose: Raised to Rule https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/western-mans-uniqueness-in-purpose-raised-to-rule/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:24:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265695310396915713

  • Western Man’s Uniqueness in Purpose: Raised to Rule

    Oct 12, 2019, 9:02 PM Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not. I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel. The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation. And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.

  • Western Man’s Uniqueness in Purpose: Raised to Rule

    Oct 12, 2019, 9:02 PM Let me put it in perspective, white people, our fairy tales, our myths, our religion, our education – we were brought up to rule. Ourselves, our families, our polities, our nations and the world. This is what the rest of the world cannot grasp, and what the underclasses cannot achieve. Our civilization evolved for the continuous production of agency – we were all brought up to be princes and princesses – to rule. An aristocracy of everyone capable of joining the aristocracy. and the paternal rule of those who are not. I have been complaining about the anglo seizure of power by the middle class, and the american attempt to create an aristocracy of everyone. But the western man has been trying to create an aristocracy of everyone since we first put horse to wheel. The problem is that loosened the requirements for the demonstration of agency – one’s ability to rule one’s self ,one’s family, on’s business, one’s polity, one’s nation. And we failed to create additional houses for the classes that did demonstrate ability as they evolved education and limited agency.

  • Censored Answer to Arabic Demographics Posted on Our Site

    Censored Answer to Arabic Demographics Posted on Our Site https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/censored-answer-to-arabic-demographics-posted-on-our-site/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 17:18:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265693863068356610