Theme: Ethnoculture

  • The Trade Off Is There

    Mar 10, 2020, 3:43 PM Neoteny is wonderful – at a cost. The price is emotional instability in europeans(female bias) Just beginning to understand east asians(male bias). We understood ashkenazim by 1900(cognitively female) but postwar suppression halted investigation. HBD-Chick was right. Now we know why. Aspies are the future if we can figure it out.

  • Questions and Answers

    Mar 11, 2020, 11:35 AM

    —“Are there any books you would recommend on the early history of European peoples? I read a post of yours recently and realized There were several references I didn’t pick up. Specifically when you reference things about “indo-Europeans”, etc. Thanks. Interested in learning more about what informs your perspective on Christianity and it’s triumph over Olympian religion. You seem to view it as a net negative. Do you have any recommendations for other groups on FB having the types of discussions you are having?”— A Friend

    ANSWERS There is nowhere to learn more, better, faster, than following daily here. It is the lowest cost education you can get, in the education you want and need. My reading list is on the website under the Propertarianism menu heading. All of it is available for free in our digital library. The IE history is simple. Although I would recommend chapter one of Armstrong’s “Transformation” so you learn about the differences in the emergence of different religious traditions. Religion is the ‘hard problem’ because our religion is communicated with the Abrahamic Technique. And there is no easy way of reforming that religion without gradual supplement with what used to be stoicism-empiricism and natural law, and letting nature take it’s course. The only reason I’m interested in our IE religions is because they’re ethnocentric, and christianity is not. I view abrahamic deceit, submission, and universalism as antithetical to our civilization. You can ask the other leadership for advice. I’m a little overwhelmed with biz, video, and writing at the moment.

  • Questions and Answers

    Mar 11, 2020, 11:35 AM

    —“Are there any books you would recommend on the early history of European peoples? I read a post of yours recently and realized There were several references I didn’t pick up. Specifically when you reference things about “indo-Europeans”, etc. Thanks. Interested in learning more about what informs your perspective on Christianity and it’s triumph over Olympian religion. You seem to view it as a net negative. Do you have any recommendations for other groups on FB having the types of discussions you are having?”— A Friend

    ANSWERS There is nowhere to learn more, better, faster, than following daily here. It is the lowest cost education you can get, in the education you want and need. My reading list is on the website under the Propertarianism menu heading. All of it is available for free in our digital library. The IE history is simple. Although I would recommend chapter one of Armstrong’s “Transformation” so you learn about the differences in the emergence of different religious traditions. Religion is the ‘hard problem’ because our religion is communicated with the Abrahamic Technique. And there is no easy way of reforming that religion without gradual supplement with what used to be stoicism-empiricism and natural law, and letting nature take it’s course. The only reason I’m interested in our IE religions is because they’re ethnocentric, and christianity is not. I view abrahamic deceit, submission, and universalism as antithetical to our civilization. You can ask the other leadership for advice. I’m a little overwhelmed with biz, video, and writing at the moment.

  • “Encouraging Fellow Germans out Of Victim Mentality”

    “ENCOURAGING FELLOW GERMANS OUT OF VICTIM MENTALITY” by Daniel Gurpide With the purpose of encouraging my German comrades to grow out of an unhelpful and debilitating victim mentality, let me add my two friendly cents: Modern Germany (1871) had the potential to rejuvenate old Europe, to extend the European age, and the primacy OF Europe, in the world for centuries to come. They destroyed this prospect because of their obsession with their own primacy IN Europe, finally and perhaps irrevocably, during the II WW. Often stronger, and on occasion more thoughtful than others, Germans, from Nietzsche to Spengler to even Hitler, would speak of the dangers to Western civilization, to the race, and to Europe. In practice, instead of consolidating europe, they would mightily contribute to the perils of the West, of Europe, and in the end, of their own Germany. There is no isolated virtue. Perhaps the very introspective qualities of the Germans obscured their better understanding of other peoples. Through a kind of offensive shortsightedness, together with an eventually disastrous alliance, they threw themselves into the First World War. The traditional order of Europe was mortally wounded during that struggle. The wounds of the German people were terrible, but far from mortal. They were sick at being treated with a great deal of injustice, as pariahs among the nations of Europe, at least for a while. Soon they would rise again and treat in turn, with far more injustice, the other nations of Europe as their pariahs. Let us also not forget that in 1917 the Kaiser and his Prussians (self-proclaimed champions of Western civilization) chose to make it possible for Lenin to re-enter Russia. In 1939 the anti-Bolshevik Hitler and his nazis chose to make it possible for Stalin to re-enter Europe. They were very successful in the short run. They destroyed themselves in the long run. Would the Bolsheviks have been able to make their revolution in 1917 if Lenin had stayed closeted in Zurich, or would Stalin have been able to get to Warsaw, not to speak of Berlin, if Hitler had not started the IIWW?

  • “Encouraging Fellow Germans out Of Victim Mentality”

    “ENCOURAGING FELLOW GERMANS OUT OF VICTIM MENTALITY” by Daniel Gurpide With the purpose of encouraging my German comrades to grow out of an unhelpful and debilitating victim mentality, let me add my two friendly cents: Modern Germany (1871) had the potential to rejuvenate old Europe, to extend the European age, and the primacy OF Europe, in the world for centuries to come. They destroyed this prospect because of their obsession with their own primacy IN Europe, finally and perhaps irrevocably, during the II WW. Often stronger, and on occasion more thoughtful than others, Germans, from Nietzsche to Spengler to even Hitler, would speak of the dangers to Western civilization, to the race, and to Europe. In practice, instead of consolidating europe, they would mightily contribute to the perils of the West, of Europe, and in the end, of their own Germany. There is no isolated virtue. Perhaps the very introspective qualities of the Germans obscured their better understanding of other peoples. Through a kind of offensive shortsightedness, together with an eventually disastrous alliance, they threw themselves into the First World War. The traditional order of Europe was mortally wounded during that struggle. The wounds of the German people were terrible, but far from mortal. They were sick at being treated with a great deal of injustice, as pariahs among the nations of Europe, at least for a while. Soon they would rise again and treat in turn, with far more injustice, the other nations of Europe as their pariahs. Let us also not forget that in 1917 the Kaiser and his Prussians (self-proclaimed champions of Western civilization) chose to make it possible for Lenin to re-enter Russia. In 1939 the anti-Bolshevik Hitler and his nazis chose to make it possible for Stalin to re-enter Europe. They were very successful in the short run. They destroyed themselves in the long run. Would the Bolsheviks have been able to make their revolution in 1917 if Lenin had stayed closeted in Zurich, or would Stalin have been able to get to Warsaw, not to speak of Berlin, if Hitler had not started the IIWW?

  • Truth Is Enough. No More Pseudoscience.

    Mar 18, 2020, 1:42 PM

    —“Humans have no subspecies.”—

    We are animals, and no different from every other creature on this earth. We adapted by class distribution, degree and rate of maturity, dimorphism in development, and by personality and temperament, in relation to environmental conditions in different temperate (latitudinal) bands across the planet with division into species, subspecies, and sub-subspecies, and continuous recursive admixture. “Species” refers only to local morphological and behavioral adaptation to conditions. It does not refer to reproductive capacity. If it did then most of the species would disappear from our lists. Our political correctness (Pseudoscience, of denial of genetic differences and their expression) is part of the marxist-postmodernist-feminist counter revolution against modernity. The fact that some species tend to inbreed, and humans and other predators like us will sometimes cross breed is due to greater identification of reproductive opportunity in more evolved organisms – and the reality of greater desirability of female neoteny as a signal of fertility regardless of species. This list has not changed much in over a century. I keep track of the tribes (they would make this list too long). But the beauty of diversity is in local homogeneity and worldwide diversity that continues genetic computation at scale producing anti-fragility and continuing human evolution. What is interesting is that these genetic differences evoke a disgust (purity) response in conservatives (threat) and a novelty response (opportunity) in progressives. This merely illustrates ur genetic strategies of the female consumer (progressive) and the male producer (conservative). In other words we are just following our instincts. Subfamily Homininae … Tribe Gorillini Genus Gorilla … … Western gorilla, Gorilla gorilla … … … Western lowland gorilla, Gorilla gorilla gorilla … … … Cross River gorilla, Gorilla gorilla diehli … … Eastern gorilla, Gorilla beringei … … … Mountain gorilla, Gorilla beringei beringei … … … Eastern lowland gorilla, Gorilla beringei graueri … Tribe Hominini … … Subtribe Panina … … … Genus Pan … … … … Chimpanzee (common chimpanzee), Pan troglodytes … … … … … Central chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes … … … … … Western chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes verus … … … … … Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes ellioti … … … … … Eastern chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii … … … … Bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee), Pan paniscus … … Subtribe Hominina … … … Genus Homo … … … … Human, Homo sapiens (Anatomically modern human) … … … … … 1- African (Species Homo Negroid / Homo African) … … … … … 2- Australoid (Species Homo Negrito / Homo Australoid) … … … … … 3- Dravidian (Dravidian) -> Indo Iranic Dravidian … … … … … 4- Mongoloid … … … … … … … NE Asian … … … … … … … Mongolian … … … … … … … Tibetan … … … … … … … Paleo Siberia … … … … … … … FInno Ugric Mongolian … … … … … … … Amerindian … … … … … … … SE Asian … … … … … … … Oceanan … … … … … 5- Caucasoid … … … … … … … European … … … … … … … Iranic … … … … … … … … Iranian … … … … … … … … Tajik … … … … … … … … Semitic … … … … … … … … North African … … … … … … … Indo-Iranic -> Indo Iranic Dravidian

  • Truth Is Enough. No More Pseudoscience.

    Mar 18, 2020, 1:42 PM

    —“Humans have no subspecies.”—

    We are animals, and no different from every other creature on this earth. We adapted by class distribution, degree and rate of maturity, dimorphism in development, and by personality and temperament, in relation to environmental conditions in different temperate (latitudinal) bands across the planet with division into species, subspecies, and sub-subspecies, and continuous recursive admixture. “Species” refers only to local morphological and behavioral adaptation to conditions. It does not refer to reproductive capacity. If it did then most of the species would disappear from our lists. Our political correctness (Pseudoscience, of denial of genetic differences and their expression) is part of the marxist-postmodernist-feminist counter revolution against modernity. The fact that some species tend to inbreed, and humans and other predators like us will sometimes cross breed is due to greater identification of reproductive opportunity in more evolved organisms – and the reality of greater desirability of female neoteny as a signal of fertility regardless of species. This list has not changed much in over a century. I keep track of the tribes (they would make this list too long). But the beauty of diversity is in local homogeneity and worldwide diversity that continues genetic computation at scale producing anti-fragility and continuing human evolution. What is interesting is that these genetic differences evoke a disgust (purity) response in conservatives (threat) and a novelty response (opportunity) in progressives. This merely illustrates ur genetic strategies of the female consumer (progressive) and the male producer (conservative). In other words we are just following our instincts. Subfamily Homininae … Tribe Gorillini Genus Gorilla … … Western gorilla, Gorilla gorilla … … … Western lowland gorilla, Gorilla gorilla gorilla … … … Cross River gorilla, Gorilla gorilla diehli … … Eastern gorilla, Gorilla beringei … … … Mountain gorilla, Gorilla beringei beringei … … … Eastern lowland gorilla, Gorilla beringei graueri … Tribe Hominini … … Subtribe Panina … … … Genus Pan … … … … Chimpanzee (common chimpanzee), Pan troglodytes … … … … … Central chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes troglodytes … … … … … Western chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes verus … … … … … Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes ellioti … … … … … Eastern chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii … … … … Bonobo (pygmy chimpanzee), Pan paniscus … … Subtribe Hominina … … … Genus Homo … … … … Human, Homo sapiens (Anatomically modern human) … … … … … 1- African (Species Homo Negroid / Homo African) … … … … … 2- Australoid (Species Homo Negrito / Homo Australoid) … … … … … 3- Dravidian (Dravidian) -> Indo Iranic Dravidian … … … … … 4- Mongoloid … … … … … … … NE Asian … … … … … … … Mongolian … … … … … … … Tibetan … … … … … … … Paleo Siberia … … … … … … … FInno Ugric Mongolian … … … … … … … Amerindian … … … … … … … SE Asian … … … … … … … Oceanan … … … … … 5- Caucasoid … … … … … … … European … … … … … … … Iranic … … … … … … … … Iranian … … … … … … … … Tajik … … … … … … … … Semitic … … … … … … … … North African … … … … … … … Indo-Iranic -> Indo Iranic Dravidian

  • The Baltics Are Not Slavic- They Are Baltics

    The Baltics Are Not Slavic- They Are Baltics https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-baltics-are-not-slavic-they-are-baltics/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 19:00:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266081876298498048

  • The Baltics Are Not Slavic- They Are Baltics

    Mar 24, 2020, 1:35 PM

    Just to reinforce Karlis Strazdins’ statement: the indo european conquest of (genocide of) proto-Europeans across the european continent consisted of latin, celtic, germanic, and baltic proto-language groups. Genetically, linguistically and culturally, Europe still consists of the following groups: proto-europeans(greece, southern italy, sardinia), latins, celtics (atlantic and continental), germanics, nordics, baltics, finnics, and the three slavic groups (western, eastern, and southern). Northern Russians are slavic with 1/5 finnic. Southern are just slavic and spoke Ukrainian before muscovite conquest from the mongols (tatars, muslims). Ukrainians west of kiev are closer to Poles than Russians. The celts and slavs were the largest groups prior to the celtic holocaust by the romans. The germanics expanded southward to fill the vacuum. The slavs expanded eastward to fill the scythian vacuum. This is why poland appears to be the genetic origin of the majority of slavic peoples. It’s not difficult to distinguish between the european subraces just by observing people in each geography. That’s how this categorization was originally done – by observation. And the observations of the late nineteenth and early twentieth were correct. So correct that we can and still and do use them today.

  • I love people. All people. My people more

    I love people. All people. My people more. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/i-love-people-all-people-my-people-more/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 16:35:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266045492565209089