Theme: Ethnoculture

  • I expect you to follow your intuition and your group evolutionary strategy and d

    I expect you to follow your intuition and your group evolutionary strategy and do what all people in the world do when their self image, self work, culture, myths, religion, and heritage are subject to criticism that exposes the underlying falsehoods, frauds, and crimes upon which they are based.

    Just as I expecd women to object.

    The question is why don’t europeans object – we simply accept and adapt. We don’t reinvent history (mythicism), or ignore our history as if we (you) didn’t exist before 1500, and weren’t responsible for precisely what those folk were accused of. We say ‘Hmmm’ we shouldn’t do that again.

    Why can’t you?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 00:43:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653198507426168832

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653198112863969280

  • Correct. The difference is that only ashkenazi and europeans produce world thoug

    Correct. The difference is that only ashkenazi and europeans produce world thought leadership especially in ethics and politics.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 23:05:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653173846508294146

    Reply addressees: @Slezkinite @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653152328294322177

  • I did not say Bentham and Rawls were Jewish. I included Bentham and Rawls in the

    I did not say Bentham and Rawls were Jewish.
    I included Bentham and Rawls in the positive law movement.

    One is member of such a group by religious participation, by secular ethnic culture and tradition independent of it, and by genetic contribution.

    Marx’s construct using… https://t.co/ZMaaOJ7no2


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 19:55:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653126095409954821

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653117431307444247

  • CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT Jewish vs Western thought manifests in th

    CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
    Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
    The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
    This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
    And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
    It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
    And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
    Especially for women.
    So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
    And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
    And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
    So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).

    (Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962154872545281

  • CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT Jewish vs Western thought manifests in th

    CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
    Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
    The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
    This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
    And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
    It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
    And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
    Especially for women.
    So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
    And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
    And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
    So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).

    (Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962155040260096

  • Well, the other side of the coin is that an african with a 70IQ isn’t ‘broken’,

    Well, the other side of the coin is that an african with a 70IQ isn’t ‘broken’, but just has a harder time with learning abstractions – but a white person or asian with the same IQ is cognitively defective. We had a wonderful young nanny from africa work for us and she just read slowly and had problems with math and abstractions, was honest and comfortable with it, and had no insecurities. Otherwise she was a wonderful human being and a flawless nanny, and perfectly capable of self support in life. I had a ‘friend’ (acquaintance) from (I think) Cameroon, that coudn’t have had more than an 80IQ and he worked so hard and was so honest and moral I adored him. And if we study by Pygmy’s who have maybe a 55IQ, they do just fine, and live fulfilling lives while a white or asian would be incapable of self care. I have a friend from Ghana who is at least in the same IQ range as I am. So when someone like the woman Emil is responding to equates whites with africans of the same IQ it’s not the same thing. Africans > South Eurasians > East Asians and Europeans all evolved under slightly different constraints. And africa, despite being our mutual origin there, because the disease gradient and competition alone, is actually a pretty hostile place that forces us to mature earlier to survive. So the value of IQ is really related to how fast we can learn and adapt to the use of physical and logical instrumentation. Otherwise just being a good person is a pretty useful skill. 😉

    Reply addressees: @AyodejiVoid @KirkegaardEmil


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 01:53:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652853716146331655

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652846359026778112

  • Well, the other side of the coin is that an african with a 70IQ isn’t ‘broken’,

    Well, the other side of the coin is that an african with a 70IQ isn’t ‘broken’, but just has a harder time with learning abstractions – but a white person or asian with the same IQ is cognitively defective. We had a wonderful young nanny from africa work for us and she just read slowly and had problems with math and abstractions, was honest and comfortable with it, and had no insecurities. Otherwise she was a wonderful human being and a flawless nanny, and perfectly capable of self support in life. I had a ‘friend’ (acquaintance) from (I think) Cameroon, that coudn’t have had more than an 80IQ and he worked so hard and was so honest and moral I adored him. And if we study by Pygmy’s who have maybe a 55IQ, they do just fine, and live fulfilling lives while a white or asian would be incapable of self care. I have a friend from Ghana who is at least in the same IQ range as I am. So when someone like the woman Emil is responding to equates whites with africans of the same IQ it’s not the same thing. Africans > South Eurasians > East Asians and Europeans all evolved under slightly different constraints. And africa, despite being our mutual origin there, because the disease gradient and competition alone, is actually a pretty hostile place that forces us to mature earlier to survive. So the value of IQ is really related to how fast we can learn and adapt to the use of physical and logical instrumentation. Otherwise just being a good person is a pretty useful skill. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 01:53:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652853716284784641

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652846359026778112

  • RT @Rushxx2: @curtdoolittle @KirkegaardEmil Since the 1950 UNESCO statement on r

    RT @Rushxx2: @curtdoolittle @KirkegaardEmil Since the 1950 UNESCO statement on race, written with WW2 trauma still palpable, the entire pla…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 00:45:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652836725792620544

  • Yes. Though I wasn’t intending to push that. Technically you’re referring to “et

    Yes. Though I wasn’t intending to push that.
    Technically you’re referring to “ethnocentric homogeneity” which produces the lowest chance of conflict and status competition.

    See: Hartshorna, Kaznatcheeva, and Shultz: The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 23:06:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652811640637734915

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652809525794144259

  • It’s not a complex function. Instead it’s a trivially simple one. The combinatio

    It’s not a complex function. Instead it’s a trivially simple one. The combination of iq, neoteny, genetic load, sex, personality, class, and culture make it APPEAR complex when it isn’t. Why? Justification.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 10:45:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652625093007138816

    Reply addressees: @mekhetgbfg @PaoloShirasi @kareem_carr

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652600919719067649