(a) natural selection did differentiate between african and european populations by 2SD or more. (b) African populations have a disproportionate load in the lower quartiles. (c) existing statistical prediction you’re referring is under the same fallacy that we are only 1+% different from chimpanzees, without knowing the distribution of the influence of alleles and the combinations of alleles in genes as expressions, given that all expression is but probabilistic given the competition of interactions, the duration of expression, during what stage of development, given the influence of cellular proximity to one another during that development. (d) African populations demonstrate much deeper and faster maturity as defense against the aggressive cline of diseases on the continent, combined with the inability to isolate, adapt, and speciate relative to the out-of-africa expansions. In the speciation events: east Africa 70
followed by dry persian gulf now 85, tibetan plateu now 105, european plain now 100, and ob river region ??, produced the primary races and subsequent hybridizations, where isolation and necessity of cooperation combined with the adversity of the environment caused selection by domestication syndrome. (e) as for personality, Africans have lower self-regulation (agency), higher aggression, and oddly enough slightly higher extroversion, just as non africans have higher potential for autism (extreme male brains).
You’re doing correlative math without the knowledge of constructive biological processes. In other words you lack the knowledge to interpret the statistics, and are using such to reinforce a bias. The rest of us are scientists attempting to produce testimony to causality by grasping the causal relations between biological processes of development and the slow and steady process of accumulating genetic information which we do not understand the causality of, aside from obviously detrimental defect (developmental failure) or phenotypic expression (coloring) due to consistent limited variation in individual alleles.
Science consists of the process of discovering correlations top down and uncovering causations bottom up, until we have a formal logic of available operations at each scale of emergent increases in combinatoric complexity (as we do in chemistry, if less so in the standard model, and more by more complexity in the folding of proteins producing biological machines by change in charge we do not yet understand), then ‘mathiness’ which in economics we refer to as ‘pseudoscience’, (just as mathiness has stunted physics), is just another error that you and those like you who lack sufficient foundations in epistemology, logic, and the scientific method, as well as the disciplines necessary to test possibility of construction, waste our time with – and cause us to have to protect the commons of information against th harms you impose on them.
Reply addressees: @Nick65979825 @KingBoru_ @UsingLyft