Theme: Education

  • Teaching argument online is far more like coaching a sports team in a locker roo

    Teaching argument online is far more like coaching a sports team in a locker room than running a class at a university.

    (thank god) lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 20:36:00 UTC

  • MEN ARE, IN FACT, BETTER PARENTS by Greg Hamilton This one will really upset the

    MEN ARE, IN FACT, BETTER PARENTS

    by Greg Hamilton

    This one will really upset the apple cart.

    The statistical horrors of single parenting we hear about: lack of school success, drugs, crime, etc are actually associated with single motherhood.

    Single fathers raise children that statistically no different from two parent households.

    Generally speaking women raise great children, men raise great adults …

    –UPDATE–

    Y’all aren’t thinking this thru.

    The data suggests that single fathers produce the same rates of negative outcome as double parent households, and that single mother households are worst of all – with highest rates of negative outcomes. Or stated inversely: single mother households produce nearly universally bad outcomes across the spectrum.

    As far as I know this is correct.

    What Y’all are doing instead of trying to explain how this data is true, is not explaining the difference between single father and single mother households.

    And you’re doing this because of ignorance, the common cognitive biases (errors) in which you assume you are average, the people you know are average, and you are extrapolating your limited knowledge (extending a curve rather than limiting a distribution).

    So, Single Mother Households:

    Black: 66% Hispanic: 41% White: 33% Asian: 21%.

    Once you face the uncomfortable fact that 50% of women will experience a psychological problem, that 40% will have some problem of some duration, and that at least 33% of women have ongoing psychological problems, (neuroticism, +estrogen and -serotonin is a bad combination), then we see one of the causes.

    If we add the fact that single mothers are more likely to work in lower income jobs, and ‘go thru multiple mates’, and have unstable emotional and economic lives, and they externalize their emotions to their children, and the kids are NEVER fooled, and they almost always feel and demonstrate guilt for it, we start to see a picture developing.

    And the we add the fact that single fathers are far more likely to be white.

    And then when we see that only stable males tend to take the role of single parent, and that almost half of those males will find a stable female to cohabitate with, and that they won’t rotate females.

    We can explain the data. Stable, white males are better parents regardless of whether they are married, ‘cohabitating’, or single, than single mothers of all races.

    And Y’all are typical … well intentioned fools … because you don’t know the most trivially obvious data. Or stated more pejoratively: that you hold opinions on matters about which you are so ignorant you’re little better than superstitious children. Ok?

    But something else is interesting: The evidence is pretty clear that (a) women are better suited to the majority (center-distribution) of occupations in modernity (service economies), but those jobs pay less, because we are paid by scarcity, risk, and loyalty; and (b) men are better suited to parenting in modernity because of our temperaments (and want of order), in particular our lack of projection, lack of guilt, and tolerance for children taking considered risks. And (c) there is a reason that historically (for almost all of human history) girls were available for wifehood (motherhood) as soon as they were fertile (13-14) and boys were transferred from women’s governance to men’s governance at fertility (12-14).

    This role reversal is what I’m interested in exploring. Because I’m not sure it’s a role reversal. Fathers have been stronger in households for all of history, and women have been more caretakers and feeders for all of history, and as far as I can tell women have moved from the kitchen to the work force, and women are more dominant as grandmothers while men are more dominant and influential as fathers.

    That’s what I want to explore.

    —ANSWERS—

    Riku Soikkeli:

    —“The explanation, if this is true, is probably that only very, very responsible fathers get selected to single fatherhood. Whereas that selection pressure is lower for women since they are viewed by society as the default caretakers. Pretty much the same statistical artifact which makes it look like gays are better parents than straight couples.”—-

    There we go.

    Took a while. thank you. 😉

    Now, this might be a problem….. Because it sure looks like poor fathers get the kids because mom is a ho and a drug addict, and not poor fathers get the kids because mom is a ho and a psycho and an addict.

    What I think is more important is simply using the data to show that single mother hood is the worst of all possible options.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 20:23:00 UTC

  • I teach argument here. I delete stupid. I delete not funny. I delete memes. If y

    I teach argument here.

    I delete stupid.

    I delete not funny.

    I delete memes.

    If you want entertainment you have dick and fart jokes, 4chan, reddit, anime, video games and porn – so go play with your toys. OK?

    Thanks.

    The Management.

    loz


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 20:21:00 UTC

  • THE BENEFIT OF THE COGNITIVE LOAD OF “ENOUGH” FAMILY by Collin Turney I worked d

    THE BENEFIT OF THE COGNITIVE LOAD OF “ENOUGH” FAMILY

    by Collin Turney

    I worked door-to-door selling educational books for families that helped from learning ABC’s to SAT college prep. I met a total of aprx 3000 families, and here is my analysis:

    1 kid – highly stressed parents and child as a by product of the psychological stress that comes with the “all the eggs in one basket” mentality. This means strict grade requirements, strict curfews and other things that are small but total up to a large amount of stress on the child because he feels like it is his duty to never fail at anything.

    2 kids: assuming tbe kids are close in age, aprx 8 years or less, creates a “versus” mentality in the family. One child is always against the other. This often will pit parents against each other as well as the kids are always trying to earn the favor of whichever parent likes them more. The younger child has a high propensity to be a polar opposite of their older sibling as they are so often compared to their older sibling and feel as if they are living in someone’s shadow and will become different out of spite to build their own identity.

    3 kids: Nearing the breaking point. Not many negatives other than the youngest often can get away with murder and the middle one feels he has no identity as he is neither the oldest nor youngest.

    4+ children: the parents at this stage are fully occupied with raising the kids and stop giving a crap about their own personal problems and just do what needs to be done to keep everyone fed. Also, they will just let kids be kids and not worry so much about if they are wrestling in the house or coloring on the walls or other petty things because the parents reach a point where they realize if they care to much about each individual thing the kids are doing they would go insane in less than a week. Also, at 4 or more kids the dynamic in the kids is such that the older kids often assume a part in raising the younger ones and everyone is held to the same standard rather than the “vs” mentality of the 2 kids family and the “baby, directionless middle child, and oldest most mature child” mentality of the 3 kids family.

    The chillest family I met had 8 kids under the age of 10 and the kids were in the middle of what seemed to be the toddler version of MMA in their front yard and the parents gave no hecks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-17 10:02:00 UTC

  • Learning Propertarianism Takes A Lot of Reading

    Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia): As someone who read the entire summary page of propertarianism, YOU WILL LEARN TO LOVE READING, OR YOU WILL UNDERSTAND NOTHING ABOUT IT.

  • Learning Propertarianism Takes A Lot of Reading

    Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia): As someone who read the entire summary page of propertarianism, YOU WILL LEARN TO LOVE READING, OR YOU WILL UNDERSTAND NOTHING ABOUT IT.

  • You Are Not Special

    by Brandon Hayes We instill the expectation of success without the subsequent struggle. When we do this early in children’s lives we set them up for failure; or more specifically with no tools to deal with failure (the inevitable kind). [a graduation speech entitled “You Are Not Special” sounds like the perfect speech and message] Here’s a great book on the crisis in the US:
    https://amzn.to/2JIYVMU
  • You Are Not Special

    by Brandon Hayes We instill the expectation of success without the subsequent struggle. When we do this early in children’s lives we set them up for failure; or more specifically with no tools to deal with failure (the inevitable kind). [a graduation speech entitled “You Are Not Special” sounds like the perfect speech and message] Here’s a great book on the crisis in the US:
    https://amzn.to/2JIYVMU
  • (coffee shop. affluent town. three extremely precocious and verbal little blonde

    (coffee shop. affluent town. three extremely precocious and verbal little blonde girls … maybe nine and under, a sister in her teens, and a mom. Unfortunately mom is talking stupid white people stuff with a friend. But the girls are creating a continuous fireworks of cuteness that just warms my heart. This is what we were like. I remember. When this was ‘normal’. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 13:38:00 UTC

  • “SHORT BUS” ( Russkiy: желтый дом ) In America, the ‘disabled’ (retarded) childr

    “SHORT BUS” ( Russkiy: желтый дом )

    In America, the ‘disabled’ (retarded) children used to be (and maybe still are), herded to and from school in a ‘short bus’ which is literally.. a short bus.

    —“The idea of ‘riding the short bus’ is used in American English in much the same way that желтый дом (yellow house) is used in Russian as a reference to mentally retarded children. United States public school systems have an extensive bus program to transport children to and from school. Regular buses hold large amounts of children. Shorter buses are typically used for “Special Education” (i.e., the mentally retarded).”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 13:34:00 UTC