Theme: Education

  • ART? MATTERS OF TASTE? OR MATTERS OF EDUCATION AND SKILL? Taste is a consequence

    ART? MATTERS OF TASTE? OR MATTERS OF EDUCATION AND SKILL?

    Taste is a consequence of ability, bias, knowledge, and skill. Some people have bad taste. Some classes have bad taste. Some cultures have bad taste. It’s not a matter of opinion.

    So just as MORAL intuitions vary due to genetics, gender, class, culture, and education, TASTE intuitions vary due to the same. They are both intuitionistic responses. But all intuitions can be trained with the limits of one’s abilities.

    Color blindness, tone deafness, face-blindness, weak pattern recognition, and general inability to learn by observation do influence you.

    Familiarity with and associations between patterns and symbols and recognition of the difference between content/value/narrative, fashion/style, movement/period, and technique/materials will anchor you in your traditional frames.

    However, it is possible to learn to understand all of them and distinguish between them, and separate premium, good, weak, and bad examples.

    The principle weakness in developing taste is composition (sets) vs objects (items). One can collect similar items, or one can make a composition consisting of items. Most people capable of learning can be trained to produce compositions instead of selecting (impulsive) items.

    For example, we can appreciate Fletes Cruz, a Botero and a Wei, just as easily as a monet and degas, just as easily as a Rubens and Durer, and to recognize the vast difference between Rodin and Michelangelo and nearly every other sculptor that ever lived. Or the self made prisons that Giacometti’s and Picasso’s styles made for them.

    Once you look at works, and tie them to periods, movements, and the economic and political environments you can see the arts as just another technological reflection of the period, and enjoy all of it.

    I can be just as happy in colonial, edwardian, victorian, craftsman, and mid century modern, and I prefer the romantics but in my hope I would hang a Rothko, and modern.

    The problem is, ‘what is your favorite’ is the absolute WORST question you can ask someone, and it is the worst way to develop taste. Instead, compositions can be beautiful or not. Preferable or not. And preferable for intended purpose or not.

    Bad work is very easy to identify because of craftsmanship and design. But bad style and content requires understanding context.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 09:46:00 UTC

  • “Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had childre

    —“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn

    No. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia).

    ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 08:27:00 UTC

  • It’s a tag. A kind of bait. I do it on purpose. I teach using King-of-the-hill g

    It’s a tag. A kind of bait. I do it on purpose. I teach using King-of-the-hill games to challenge MEN – I don’t display my work like a beggar in the bazaar. Followers understand it. Newbs react like you and attack it. The fact that you respond as such demonstrates it works. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 23:29:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053065549918429189

    Reply addressees: @weltmord

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052787942031335424


    IN REPLY TO:

    @weltmord

    @curtdoolittle You could spare writing the “you don’t understand” every time. Plus there were a lot of people who claimed the same.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052787942031335424

  • “Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than

    “Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than adults living in pre-modern cultures. For example, according to studies conducted in the 1960s and 1970s, even educated adults living in Papua New Guinea did not reach the formal stage. Australian Aborigines who were still living a traditional lifestyle barely developed beyond a preoperational stage in their adult years. Without a population that has mentally developed to the level of formal operations, which entails a capacity to think about abstract relationships and symbols without concrete forms, a capacity to grasp syllogistic reasoning, comprehend algebra, formulate hypotheses, there can be no modernization”

    Or a concept of reciprocal, negotiated sovereignty!

    Conceptualising and operating in such a paradigm is as foreign as colonising mars!

    https://www.counter-currents.com/…/jean-piaget-the-superio…/

    h/tip Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:52:00 UTC

  • The Market Competition Between Meaning and Truth

    October 18th, 2018 10:53 AM THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH

    Education: the market competition between: …. POSITIVA: MEANING: Literature, Myth, Parable – The act of Generating constant relations, and The Promise of Reward. …. -vs- …. NEGATIVA: TRUTH: History, Law, Science, Mathematics – Falsify (test) constant relations: The act of Performing Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit and The Warranty (Promise) of Truth (non-falsehood).

  • The Market Competition Between Meaning and Truth

    October 18th, 2018 10:53 AM THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH

    Education: the market competition between: …. POSITIVA: MEANING: Literature, Myth, Parable – The act of Generating constant relations, and The Promise of Reward. …. -vs- …. NEGATIVA: TRUTH: History, Law, Science, Mathematics – Falsify (test) constant relations: The act of Performing Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit and The Warranty (Promise) of Truth (non-falsehood).

  • GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Phil

    GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE

    (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Philosophy < Literature, Myth, Fairy-tale < vs (Conflation) Religion : Graceful Failure from the most able (With Agency) to the least able (Without Agency).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 14:05:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052923527752499200

  • THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH Education: the market competiti

    THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH

    Education: the market competition between:

    …. POSITIVA: MEANING: Literature, Myth, Parable – The act of Generating constant relations, and The Promise of Reward.

    …. -vs-

    …. NEGATIVA: TRUTH: History, Law, Science, Mathematics – Falsify (test) constant relations: The act of Performing Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit and The Warranty (Promise) of Truth (non-falsehood).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:53:00 UTC

  • GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Phil

    GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE

    (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Philosophy < Literature, Myth, Fairy-tale < vs (Conflation) Religion : Graceful Failure from the most able (With Agency) to the least able (Without Agency).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:04:00 UTC

  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION CONSIST OF THE CULT OF THE LAW. EVERYTHING ELSE IS EDUCATIO

    WESTERN CIVILIZATION CONSIST OF THE CULT OF THE LAW. EVERYTHING ELSE IS EDUCATION.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 16:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052600635491840001