Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • It’s a Bit Like Studying for A STEM+L Degree

    October 21st, 2018 12:35 PM UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES TIME. IT’S NON-TRIVIAL.

    —“I’m having a hard time understanding propertarianism tbh. I’m reading your articles on the website but still….what should I do?:— Ayham Nedal

    [O]ur Reading List helps with general knowledge so that you can tell we know what we’re talking about. Propertarianism consists of a broad set of concepts that produce a logic and science of social science in all its uses. We draw terms and ideas from math to logic to philosophy to law to economics to the sciences. And it’s because we do so, that we were able to UNITE THE SCIENCES into a SINGLE LANGUAGE consistent across all of them, thereby eliminating the silos, and allowing us to identify the falsehoods or imprecisions in each of them. So we include books on every major subject in social science. The Introductions to Propertarianism are very helpful. They are: The CONCEPTS: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/basic-concepts/ (Which I should fill out a bit more if I get some time) AND THE CORE 2) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/ Libertarianism (Mises, Hayek, Haslitt, Rothbard, Hoppe), tried very hard to unite social science, economics, law, and politics but they were not successful. However, if you understand libertarianism, Ely Harman’s introduction is very helpful in helping with the transition. We probably should write a transition document for the Dark Enlightenment folk (Moldbug), and for Classical Liberals, and for Fascists. But we have only so much time…. HISTORY The cycles of history, and the competition between the Western (Science/Law), Asian (military/political), and Semitic (Religion,Mythology), is something almost anyone can understand. The secret to the west is easy to understand (computational velocity by sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, markets in everything).. MANKIND The Acquisitionism (psychology), Propertarianism (ethics), and the Class System, and Perfect Government, are not difficult. but require learning some precise terms. This is harder than it should be in my opinion and I don’t know why it’s difficult. It’s just training yourself to categorize by property rather than moral norms. LOGIC Testimonialism (grammars, logic, scientific speech, and the geometry of meaning) is extremely challenging if you do not have experience in philosophy of science, math, and logic. and writing arguments in natural law (balanced transactions) takes quite a bit of practice. This is hard. But, it’s the entire basis of the program. Because it is the completion of the scientifc method that’s based upon testimonialism, and our ability to suppress fraud and deceit in the commons (political speech) is dependent upon encoding Testimonialism (a checklist of due diligences) into the law. IT’S BIG This is a bigger scope of work than Marxism. So we cover the entire spectrum of metaphysics, psychology, testimony (truth), ethics, sociology, politics, law, group evolutionary strategy, and war. Lastly, just ASK US. if I don’t answer, someone else will. We KNOW that we have to make a course for it. The course outline is already on the site. But without the book(s) it is not going to be easily taught. So everyone (me included) is waiting on me to finish – and it’s killing me…. lol.

  • It’s a Bit Like Studying for A STEM+L Degree

    October 21st, 2018 12:35 PM UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES TIME. IT’S NON-TRIVIAL.

    —“I’m having a hard time understanding propertarianism tbh. I’m reading your articles on the website but still….what should I do?:— Ayham Nedal

    [O]ur Reading List helps with general knowledge so that you can tell we know what we’re talking about. Propertarianism consists of a broad set of concepts that produce a logic and science of social science in all its uses. We draw terms and ideas from math to logic to philosophy to law to economics to the sciences. And it’s because we do so, that we were able to UNITE THE SCIENCES into a SINGLE LANGUAGE consistent across all of them, thereby eliminating the silos, and allowing us to identify the falsehoods or imprecisions in each of them. So we include books on every major subject in social science. The Introductions to Propertarianism are very helpful. They are: The CONCEPTS: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/basic-concepts/ (Which I should fill out a bit more if I get some time) AND THE CORE 2) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/ Libertarianism (Mises, Hayek, Haslitt, Rothbard, Hoppe), tried very hard to unite social science, economics, law, and politics but they were not successful. However, if you understand libertarianism, Ely Harman’s introduction is very helpful in helping with the transition. We probably should write a transition document for the Dark Enlightenment folk (Moldbug), and for Classical Liberals, and for Fascists. But we have only so much time…. HISTORY The cycles of history, and the competition between the Western (Science/Law), Asian (military/political), and Semitic (Religion,Mythology), is something almost anyone can understand. The secret to the west is easy to understand (computational velocity by sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, markets in everything).. MANKIND The Acquisitionism (psychology), Propertarianism (ethics), and the Class System, and Perfect Government, are not difficult. but require learning some precise terms. This is harder than it should be in my opinion and I don’t know why it’s difficult. It’s just training yourself to categorize by property rather than moral norms. LOGIC Testimonialism (grammars, logic, scientific speech, and the geometry of meaning) is extremely challenging if you do not have experience in philosophy of science, math, and logic. and writing arguments in natural law (balanced transactions) takes quite a bit of practice. This is hard. But, it’s the entire basis of the program. Because it is the completion of the scientifc method that’s based upon testimonialism, and our ability to suppress fraud and deceit in the commons (political speech) is dependent upon encoding Testimonialism (a checklist of due diligences) into the law. IT’S BIG This is a bigger scope of work than Marxism. So we cover the entire spectrum of metaphysics, psychology, testimony (truth), ethics, sociology, politics, law, group evolutionary strategy, and war. Lastly, just ASK US. if I don’t answer, someone else will. We KNOW that we have to make a course for it. The course outline is already on the site. But without the book(s) it is not going to be easily taught. So everyone (me included) is waiting on me to finish – and it’s killing me…. lol.

  • PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES TIME. IT’S NON-TRIVIAL.

    —“I’m having a hard time understanding propertarianism tbh. I’m reading your articles on the website but still….what should I do?:— Ayham Nedal

    Our Reading List helps with general knowledge so that you can tell we know what we’re talking about. Propertarianism consists of a broad set of concepts that produce a logic and science of social science in all its uses. We draw terms and ideas from math to logic to philosophy to law to economics to the sciences. And it’s because we do so, that we were able to UNITE THE SCIENCES into a SINGLE LANGUAGE consistent across all of them, thereby eliminating the silos, and allowing us to identify the falsehoods or imprecisions in each of them.

    So we include books on every major subject in social science.

    The Introductions to Propertarianism are very helpful. They are:

    The CONCEPTS:

    1) https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    (Which I should fill out a bit more if I get some time)

    AND

    THE CORE

    2) https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/

    Libertarianism (Mises, Hayek, Haslitt, Rothbard, Hoppe), tried very hard to unite social science, economics, law, and politics but they were not successful. However, if you understand libertarianism, Ely Harman’s introduction is very helpful in helping with the transition.

    We probably should write a transition document for the Dark Enlightenment folk (Moldbug), and for Classical Liberals, and for Fascists. But we have only so much time….

    HISTORY

    The cycles of history, and the competition between the Western (Science/Law), Asian (military/political), and Semitic (Religion,Mythology), is something almost anyone can understand. The secret to the west is easy to understand (computational velocity by sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, markets in everything)..

    MANKIND

    The Acquisitionism (psychology), Propertarianism (ethics), and the Class System, and Perfect Government, are not difficult. but require learning some precise terms. This is harder than it should be in my opinion and I don’t know why it’s difficult. It’s just training yourself to categorize by property rather than moral norms.

    LOGIC

    Testimonialism (grammars, logic, scientific speech, and the geometry of meaning) is extremely challenging if you do not have experience in philosophy of science, math, and logic. and writing arguments in natural law (balanced transactions) takes quite a bit of practice. This is hard. But, it’s the entire basis of the program. Because it is the completion of the scientifc method that’s based upon testimonialism, and our ability to suppress fraud and deceit in the commons (political speech) is dependent upon encoding Testimonialism (a checklist of due diligences) into the law.

    IT’S BIG

    This is a bigger scope of work than Marxism. So we cover the entire spectrum of metaphysics, psychology, testimony (truth), ethics, sociology, politics, law, group evolutionary strategy, and war.

    Lastly, just ASK US. if I don’t answer, someone else will.

    We KNOW that we have to make a course for it. The course outline is already on the site. But without the book(s) it is not going to be easily taught. So everyone (me included) is waiting on me to finish – and it’s killing me…. lol.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 12:35:00 UTC

  • It takes a great deal of accumulated skill (or experience with life, law, econom

    It takes a great deal of accumulated skill (or experience with life, law, economics and software) to make propertarian arguments. It’s a discipline. It’s non trivial. But, they are POST-MORAL arguments. That’s the thing. They are no longer normative. They consist of MEASUREMENTS not VALUES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 11:53:00 UTC

  • Masculinity – The Book Collection For Gentlemen.

    October 20th, 2018 11:21 AM ONE OF MY ALBUMS: A COLLECTION I KEPT AT MY HOUSE. SECRET: Almost everything you read on manliness will teach you to be an officer and a gentleman in civilian clothes. That’s all it is. We tend to create soldiers of the state today, who are participants in the administration of combined arms. In that sense we produce few Officers and Gentlemen. We have lost our intergenerational military aristocracy as the principle origin of our political representatives. So it is increasingly difficult to imitate an aristocrat. One can still learn how to be a warrior. It is increasingly difficult to learn to be an aristocrat. For that reason we can and must restore the skill base deliberately. Um. It sells. Aristocrat Sells, Athlete sells, Musician sells, Money Sells. Sell women less (they consume) and sell men more (produce together).

  • “Did your views change at all when you had children?”

    October 20th, 2018 8:27 AM

    —“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn

    [N]o. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia). ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )

  • “Did your views change at all when you had children?”

    October 20th, 2018 8:27 AM

    —“Did your views on allocation of public funds change at all when you had children from when you didn’t?”— Dan Springhorn

    [N]o. It was just study of economics and history: data. And most importantly, when I understood the uniqueness of western civilization as commons. Now, there are no such thing as ‘public funds’ other than credit money. The rest is private funds that have been possible because of the political order of property rights. So, there is a difference between redistribution for consumption, and redistribution into commons, and the externalities whether consumptive or common. In general, parks, infrastructure, and insurance are good commons, but charity needs be private so that it produces the optimum externalities (charity) vs the worse possible externalities (welfare that breeds dysgenia). ( As a side note, I (me, myself) don’t figure into my thinking much at all. My test is reciprocity, capital production, competition, eugenics, and evolution-transcendence. )

  • UNDERSTANDING MINDFULNESS, CLASS, COSTS Wealthy Intergenerational Families Learn

    UNDERSTANDING MINDFULNESS, CLASS, COSTS

    Wealthy Intergenerational Families Learn and Perpetuate Mindfulness.

    Etiquette and Habits are simply SIGNALS of MINDFULNESS.

    Meaning you are trustworthy.

    Because etiquette and Habits ARE COSTLY.

    It is the WILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that the signal communicates.

    It is the UNWILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that classlessness communicates.

    Classical protestant families are stoic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 10:58:00 UTC

  • SCHOOL FOR WOMEN

    https://elegantwoman.org/etiquette-charm-finishing-schoolFINISHING SCHOOL FOR WOMEN

    https://elegantwoman.org/etiquette-charm-finishing-school

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 10:57:00 UTC

  • FINISHING SCHOOL FOR MEN

    FINISHING SCHOOL FOR MEN

    https://www.britishbutlerinstitute.com/finishing-school-home/finishing-school-programmes/finishing-school-for-men/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 10:56:00 UTC