Theme: Education

  • (…Teaching requires being a least a little entertaining….)

    (…Teaching requires being a least a little entertaining….)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 03:16:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099870619372523520

  • (…Teaching requires being a least a little entertaining….)

    (…Teaching requires being a least a little entertaining….)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 22:15:00 UTC

  • COURSE UPDATE —“Hello Curt, I’d like to check in with you as to when the cours

    COURSE UPDATE

    —“Hello Curt, I’d like to check in with you as to when the courses start on Propertarianism.com. http://Propertarianism.com. Is LAW103 (The Method: The Core) the first one that’ll be held? Do I understand correctly that it will start on this Monday the 25th? I think you posted that on FB at some point. Just wondering what I should do next. Thanks”—

    The course LAW103 will start this week, and I will dribble out the content as we go. (Dribble is the technical term in the software, which i find kind of ‘humorous’. )

    A course consists of Lessons, which consist of Topics. A topic consists of one or more videos, and an assignment.

    WHEN TO JOIN:

    Maybe wait until I get a few topics or lessons out (a week or two) then sign up and catch up on those lessons. (They are quite a bit of work.) This will also ensure i don’t get overwhelmed learning how to run the course myself. (although given the high quality of responses I think it’ll be easier than I thought.)

    DATE:

    I’m running behind because the ‘hit pieces’ made me burn two weeks on their nonsense. So I’m still producing the content.

    ANNOUNCING:

    I’ll announce on the FB feed when I think more people should join up without missing out, and ‘notify’ everyone via the application (institute site) email.

    So. Assuming you’ve Applied (completed Course APPLY01), and if we have approved your application. you can fork over your cash in a week or two.

    It’s more ‘enjoyable’ to progress along with everyone else. But it’s not required. It’s not like a classroom. We need each other to do the work, but we don’t have to all work at the same speed.

    OK?

    Hugs. Thanks for asking.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:36:00 UTC

  • YES, SALES IS BEST, AND THE EXECUTIVE PATH, BUT… -“CURT (Career Advice): Sales

    YES, SALES IS BEST, AND THE EXECUTIVE PATH, BUT…

    -“CURT (Career Advice): Sales is the upper limit for earning but it is especially NPC heavy, where the better salesman are either NPCs, or front so well as them it is indistinguishable.”-

    This isn’t really true. The more risk you are mitigating with your sale, the less being an NPC (likable) is valuable. Conversely, the less substantial your sale, the more ‘likability’ is what the consumer is purchasing.

    I sold every expensive high risk propositions and delivered greater customer service than the competition, with less concern for profit, and more concern for customer retention. But I am a closer. I don’t ‘originate’ sales. I don’t have the personality for it. I hire people who do.

    So your personality must satisfy the criteria: origination (likability), or winning a competition (skill), or holding an income stream (customer care.).

    You must sell what you are best at selling.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 20:35:00 UTC

  • Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling

    Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling them the truth that they intuit but can’t put into words. That’s the ‘thrill’ of learning P.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 21:13:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098692160172376064

  • Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling

    Young men just like the fact that someone, for maybe the first time, is telling them the truth that they intuit but can’t put into words. That’s the ‘thrill’ of learning P.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:13:00 UTC

  • The purpose of argument is the education of the audience. I took the opportunity

    The purpose of argument is the education of the audience. I took the opportunity to educate the audience. (and yeah, given that I specialize in exposition of abrahamic substitute for argument including GSRM, it’s trivially easy to wind me up. … and you would have.) -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 16:08:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098615521162002433

    Reply addressees: @mauritian_strug @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098609987511898112


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098609987511898112

  • (11 – Because my first draft restored the church to central functions of educati

    (11 – Because my first draft restored the church to central functions of education, and cut public schools, post offices, title registries, banking and credit, and returned those functions to the church. thus ensuring its survival, and the starvation of competing cults.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:37:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098607688710307841

    Reply addressees: @mauritian_strug @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098553063575572480


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098553063575572480

  • (9 -This means we simply write the law without compromise and let the interests

    (9 -This means we simply write the law without compromise and let the interests of faith compete with everyone’s material interests; and as such we cannot restore education and state support to the churches, which they desperately need for their survival and political influence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:31:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098606040059396096

    Reply addressees: @mauritian_strug @DataDistribute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098553063575572480


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098553063575572480

  • PRODUCING LEADERS NOT LEADING by Tim Kay To those who don’t get it: Curt’s a lea

    PRODUCING LEADERS NOT LEADING

    by Tim Kay

    To those who don’t get it: Curt’s a leader-producer, not a leader. Which is more crucial but just not the same role. Leaders are those best able to make use of the intellectual weaponry he develops in their respective niches. They emerge from the slush pile that is the audience. It seems to me that there is a core of Propertarian judges (those capable of continuing Curt’s work at his level) who are currently in development, and then a core of leaders (those who can propagate and mobilise), with some overlap between the two.

    It would be incorrect to ask Curt to be the leader because …

    *THE RIGHT ISN”T A MONOLITH*. … Leaders must be discovered in order to fit the demands of the various groups (and their grammars).

    An important consideration is the long-term viability of the work. As such making it about Curt would defeat the purpose; seeding a sufficiently distributed group of leaders is essential.

    To those who are looking for a leader, I would suggest nominating your existing de facto leader to get on board with Propertarianism and so fill one of the niches, or, to keep an eye on the talent produced by the project.



    (

    from CURTD:

    Let me repeat this because it’s the core of it:

    —“Leaders must be discovered in order to fit the demands of the various groups (and their grammars). “—

    I produce political weaponry. One of the weapons is leaders. I am not nor do I want to be a leader. We must act as one, not be led by one.

    Honestly I’m absolutely floored someone made this argument (grammars) instead of me because it is evidence of how far we have come in PRODUCING thought leadership.

    ).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-21 15:19:00 UTC