Curt Doolittle

Theme: Education

  • Here is an old but good example. So between IQ distributions and limits to compo

    Here is an old but good example. So between IQ distributions and limits to composition (culture), cultral signaling differences, and costs of production (instruments, wealth) the distribution is PAINFULLY obvious. https://t.co/LiCmggJHrA

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-29 21:37:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122978233530683398

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122973529601867778

    IN REPLY TO:

    @FullAccountant

    @curtdoolittle Curt do you like any form of metal music? Also, why does it seem to be a music genre liked primarily by white men?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122973529601867778

  • I think A lot of my intellectual framing was caused by reading history, military

    I think A lot of my intellectual framing was caused by reading history, military, and science, then AI then Economics, and then working backward through intellectual history, instead of forward through it. So the ‘frame’ I work from is present.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-29 15:28:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122885332599476224

  • I don’t know much of any of this stuff, but I asked someone to explain it to me

    I don’t know much of any of this stuff, but I asked someone to explain it to me a few days ago, and learned my thing-of-the-day. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-28 00:54:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122303083520909312

    Reply addressees: @VolkischWeeb @Kinsman03980346 @EvilHonkler @ElizabethMunley

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122297141496410112

    IN REPLY TO:

    @gothickagura

    @curtdoolittle @Kinsman03980346 @EvilHonkler @ElizabethMunley i find it funny u know that thing is called a honkler

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1122297141496410112

  • ( a) How long have you been following me? It takes quite a while to ‘get it’. (b

    ( a) How long have you been following me? It takes quite a while to ‘get it’. (b) those who can understand without more investment by me, do understand, just fine. (c) A three dimensional point score should not be difficult to understand for anyone with knowledge of the logics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-30 15:45:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112017951807426560

    Reply addressees: @Jesuit666

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112005591302463488

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112005591302463488

  • Literacy

    November 6th, 2018 8:55 AM “Literacy: means ‘capable of reading and writing’. Being “Illiterate’ means incapable of reading and writing. Being “Literate” means ‘Well Read’ OR ‘he can read and write’. This is another one of those terms where we need a demarcation to prevent conflation. illiterate “can’t read” > literate – “can read” > “literate – well read”.

  • Literacy

    November 6th, 2018 8:55 AM “Literacy: means ‘capable of reading and writing’. Being “Illiterate’ means incapable of reading and writing. Being “Literate” means ‘Well Read’ OR ‘he can read and write’. This is another one of those terms where we need a demarcation to prevent conflation. illiterate “can’t read” > literate – “can read” > “literate – well read”.

  • Curt Doolittle posted in The General Staff (The White Law).

    (FB 1541973192 Timestamp) THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THE INVITE So why is it that you have all made such amazing progress together? I mean. All of you have made dramatic progress. and while I think some of it is feedback from synchronicity with current events, the reality is that for some reason a lot of people are reaching ‘sufficient mastery’ at the same time. We want, (I want), to know, for the purpose of future education of others, what you have (bill has) done in Sheepdog that works so effectively. In contrast, absolutists tend to learn the fastest but then they defect into wordplay instead of action. I feel like I am attracting and filtering people who then aggregate into like-groups and work together. I want to understand how we can create a spectrum of these ‘groups’ whether intentionally or by slowly fostering the right people. And I want to (a) run classes on the one hand and (b) organize and plan for ‘action’ on the other. Thanks for any help you can provide.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541965075 Timestamp) —“Peterson disgusts me, his entire job is to net the young men that are dropping out, pick them up, dust them off, put them back on the conveyer belt to get chewed up and spat out by modern women while wealth is extracted from them for the globo-homo machine. A machine he fully endorses at its fundamental core.”—Jacob Bastion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541988040 Timestamp) ( You don’t get it. We’re going from gas station, to shop, to bar, to construction site, to campus to recruit door to door, town to town, city to city. Mao did it right. Men who argue are on the internet, but men who will fight and do so for booty, loot, power, and revenge, are those who are valuable. And they don’t care about arguments. They care about change for themselves, their families, and their people – and they care about punishing those who deprived them. )

  • Curt Doolittle posted in The General Staff (The White Law).

    (FB 1541973192 Timestamp) THANK YOU FOR ACCEPTING THE INVITE So why is it that you have all made such amazing progress together? I mean. All of you have made dramatic progress. and while I think some of it is feedback from synchronicity with current events, the reality is that for some reason a lot of people are reaching ‘sufficient mastery’ at the same time. We want, (I want), to know, for the purpose of future education of others, what you have (bill has) done in Sheepdog that works so effectively. In contrast, absolutists tend to learn the fastest but then they defect into wordplay instead of action. I feel like I am attracting and filtering people who then aggregate into like-groups and work together. I want to understand how we can create a spectrum of these ‘groups’ whether intentionally or by slowly fostering the right people. And I want to (a) run classes on the one hand and (b) organize and plan for ‘action’ on the other. Thanks for any help you can provide.