Theme: Education

  • The via Negativa Reversal of The 20 Th to 21 St

    Jan 31, 2020, 5:22 PM

    —“In the information age, it’s less important to have the information than knowing how to discriminate from and work with all the information that is available. And P can be immensely helpful with that.”— Martin Štěpán

  • The via Negativa Reversal of The 20 Th to 21 St

    Jan 31, 2020, 5:22 PM

    —“In the information age, it’s less important to have the information than knowing how to discriminate from and work with all the information that is available. And P can be immensely helpful with that.”— Martin Štěpán

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/you-dont-need-to-go-to-university-to-undrestand-econ/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 14:37:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266740640035082240

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:38 PM I’m still not sure economics is something you need to go to school for unless you plan on spending a life doing basic research by scouring the world for other people’s data sets. Calculus, Statistics, (good)Math for Physics instead of (bad) math for economics yes. Aside from that, reading a micro and a macro textbook, learning about 150 ‘rules of thumb’, reading Gary Becker’s work on the Economics of Human Behavior, and maybe Rothbard’s Mystery of Banking is enough. It’s mostly common sense, it’s just that it’s invisible and the entire financial system is absurd and arcane (and immoral) and the entire political system simply lies like hell every day because darwin is unacceptable to democracy and marxism. In a perfect world I’d just crank out classes for the institute, because people want a non-woo-woo education – but revolution calls.

  • You don’t need to go to university to undrestand econ

    Feb 4, 2020, 3:38 PM I’m still not sure economics is something you need to go to school for unless you plan on spending a life doing basic research by scouring the world for other people’s data sets. Calculus, Statistics, (good)Math for Physics instead of (bad) math for economics yes. Aside from that, reading a micro and a macro textbook, learning about 150 ‘rules of thumb’, reading Gary Becker’s work on the Economics of Human Behavior, and maybe Rothbard’s Mystery of Banking is enough. It’s mostly common sense, it’s just that it’s invisible and the entire financial system is absurd and arcane (and immoral) and the entire political system simply lies like hell every day because darwin is unacceptable to democracy and marxism. In a perfect world I’d just crank out classes for the institute, because people want a non-woo-woo education – but revolution calls.

  • The Social Function of Elite Universities

    The Social Function of Elite Universities https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/the-social-function-of-elite-universities/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 23:09:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266507090702499841

  • The Social Function of Elite Universities

    Feb 28, 2020, 10:07 AM Elite universities open the door to cushier jobs – meaning they don’t have to work with commoners – without having to compete in the ‘real’ market. Top universities are, to some degree, a test of character – which is why governments prefer to hire from them when possible. Not because people are more capable, but because they are less likely to take risks that would jeopardize their investments in their privileged and high status positions. This strategy has worked in china and in europe. It has worked less well in the USA for reasons well understood. Creative, innovative, high agency, high risk takers are not suitable for the top universities and the ‘academic grind’. This is the hard wall that I didn’t hit, but Taleb did. It’s why he went off the deep end. Its because it turns out that there is a very good reason those people from good schools get those jobs and more ‘dynamic’ people don’t. Because the more responsibility the higher the risk to those one is responsible to. And europeans do not seize non-productive opportunities. There are opportunities for profit that men of character do not seize because they are unproductive. Taleb did. So did Soros. And Bernie Madoff’s don’t go to Harvard or Yale.

  • The Social Function of Elite Universities

    Feb 28, 2020, 10:07 AM Elite universities open the door to cushier jobs – meaning they don’t have to work with commoners – without having to compete in the ‘real’ market. Top universities are, to some degree, a test of character – which is why governments prefer to hire from them when possible. Not because people are more capable, but because they are less likely to take risks that would jeopardize their investments in their privileged and high status positions. This strategy has worked in china and in europe. It has worked less well in the USA for reasons well understood. Creative, innovative, high agency, high risk takers are not suitable for the top universities and the ‘academic grind’. This is the hard wall that I didn’t hit, but Taleb did. It’s why he went off the deep end. Its because it turns out that there is a very good reason those people from good schools get those jobs and more ‘dynamic’ people don’t. Because the more responsibility the higher the risk to those one is responsible to. And europeans do not seize non-productive opportunities. There are opportunities for profit that men of character do not seize because they are unproductive. Taleb did. So did Soros. And Bernie Madoff’s don’t go to Harvard or Yale.

  • Ignorance by Design

    Feb 28, 2020, 5:58 PM by Daniel Roland Anderson

    There were maybe 10-15 people in my law school Constitutional Law class who’d read the entire Constitution. Only one had ever read the Federalist Papers—and that was before undergrad, not part of undergrad.

  • Ignorance by Design

    Feb 28, 2020, 5:58 PM by Daniel Roland Anderson

    There were maybe 10-15 people in my law school Constitutional Law class who’d read the entire Constitution. Only one had ever read the Federalist Papers—and that was before undergrad, not part of undergrad.