RT @LukeWeinhagen: When I say we are extending childhood ever further it’s not just social commentary.
From college entrance requirements…
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-12 01:52:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856153112064733660
RT @LukeWeinhagen: When I say we are extending childhood ever further it’s not just social commentary.
From college entrance requirements…
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-12 01:52:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856153112064733660
TRUMP ENDS THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
(How much money does that save? Over $80 Billion)
Question:
What is the budget for the department of education, how many employees does it hold, what is the cost per employee, and what is the approximate cost per student?
Answer
Budget… https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1856021616503009296
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 19:01:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856049513007546408
(I’d be willing to spend 30 min with you on it just so I could learn how to answer this question for the others who ask. Let me know.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:24:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855768571449864456
Reply addressees: @EdwardKulak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765749333205054
I”d have to try to teach someone in their field how to do so, and recognize the delta between what they’re doing and what I’m doing. With that understanding I could probably articulate it in general terms.
I’ve been working with neural networks since the seventies, and expert systems since the eighties, and on my current project since the nineties. So I already think about pretty much everything in manifolds. And in that sense I sort of intuit how the models function.
And since I work with them every day, i know how to avoid their tendency to go sideways (which is often).
The primary lesson I’d teach it is that you need to provide it a theoretical foundation of whatever paradigm you’re working with before you can ask questions of any depth or meaning. Writing books (what brad and I do) means we spend a lot of time teaching. it something so that we can ask questions about it.
For your field, you’d need to give either work with it to develop a theory or provide it with a theory before you can ask much of meaning within the context of the theory. In other words you need to provide it with the organization and limits of the context in qhich you want to ask the questions.
Reply addressees: @EdwardKulak
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-11 00:23:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855768365929041920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855765749333205054
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @queen_calder @curtdoolittle I teach.
That said, the question misunderstands the role of empathy.
Empathy functions in…
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-10 20:59:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855716906122334464
As one scientist noted:
–“While I was impressed by the performance of the [AI tool]…I couldn’t help feeling that much of my education is now worthless. This is not what I was trained to do.”–
We went through a bit of this with the original PC revolution’s introduction into… https://twitter.com/calebwatney/status/1855022092401754482
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-09 14:58:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1855263761281720551
(Humor)
DISCUSSING THE EXASPERATION OF TRYING TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING OF CONSEQUENCE TO COMMON FOLK
1. “Do not … cast your pearls before swine” – Matthew 7:6
2. “Never try to each a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig.” – Heinlein
3. “Don’t wrestle with pigs; you both get dirty, and the pig likes it.” – folk origins,
4. “If Pigs could fly….” – John Withals in his 1616 English-Latin dictionary.
5. “Pigs might fly but they make a terrible landing” – Modern addition
6. “That’s making a silk purse from a sow’s ear.” – English philosopher Stephen Gosson in 1579
7 “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.” – origins in common American vernacular.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-08 00:20:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854680234458812417
Net is you have to learn from us (unfortunately). Thought the first book will help you a bit. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-06 18:04:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854223284793135523
Reply addressees: @alexander_he_is @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1854215766544945471
Adjust for degree, and it’s false. Degrees are not proxies for intelligence. Stem degrees are. Most degrees, particuarly those favored by women who dominate the college admissions, not only don’t convey intelligence, but most often the opposite.
Until we have IQ tests at age 22 to 25 we only know by lifetime performance.
There is no evidence that ‘dems’ are smarter. The opposite is true (yes the work’s been done). Republicans are smarter than democrats. But Liberals are smarter than conservatives? Why? Sizes of the populations.
Reply addressees: @zachweinberg
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-04 19:00:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1853512555098193920
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1853284870975365126
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Parents need to stop raising children and start raising adults.
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-02 21:56:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1852832189064581492