Theme: Education

  • Eduction+Academy have the opposite interest: they are teaching people to be unre

    Eduction+Academy have the opposite interest: they are teaching people to be unregulated, undomesticated, dutiless, magical thinking, unaccountable, hyperconsumptive, dead weight generations to undermine the civilization from within. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1461033495120297984

  • The Church created a court for manners, but the Church had a vested economic int

    The Church created a court for manners, but the Church had a vested economic interest in the production of a labor force whose proceeds could fund the churchmen.

    Education+Academy have no positive incentives, means of measurement, warranty, or liability – that’s why they fail.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-17 18:08:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1461033495120297984

  • RT @DegenRolf: Misconceptions about economics are largely immune to being correc

    RT @DegenRolf: Misconceptions about economics are largely immune to being corrected by rational arguments. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016748702100091X https://…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-16 02:13:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460430788227383300

  • “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you n

    – “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” –

    Yes it is. Every day. That said…

    I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience.

    There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass.
    Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake.

    As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk.

    I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states.

    And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution.

    Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable.

    The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself.

    (…more in comments)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:31:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654

  • @WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one.

    @WhitesAdvocate I make the point, I make the point over many posts not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience.

    There is only one way to save our civilizatoin it’s by showing up in mass.
    Showing up in mass requries set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The youung men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadershp that fragments into personality cults – precisely becuase you lack teh competency tod o anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake.

    As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbsculls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the cahnces that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those fromthe future who don’t show and take the risk.

    I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementalbe solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left , center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states.

    And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution.

    Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable.

    The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly it’s geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self interest against it self.

    Law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure are the operating system for government, and money is the resource it uses as influence.

    Do you need to understand the science behind the law that makes all that operation of a complex political organization possible? No you don’t. But I and those like me do. We are the judges that will administer that law. WE have to understand it.

    (more below)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:20:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282223412964301

  • THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought,

    THINKING:”How do I teach others how to think about all existence, life, thought, feeling, and behavior operationally – by construction from first principles – by disambiguation into first principles?” Well, you list the first principles and gradually learn(habituate) the process.

    I don’t think there is any magic to it. It’s like anything else. People may want a single insight like they get with ideology or philosophy or theology. But P-Law is in the same categorical hierarchy as math, programming, (P-Law,) formal (Verbal) logic. You have to PRACTICE it.

    It’s the same with my work. Newbs find something I write or say and then jump to some conclusion that’s false. Or they complain that it’s incoherent or complex or word salad. The answer is you learn math, programming, P-law, and formal logic by STUDY not by immediate insight.

    That said, given the four sciences: Formal(Logics), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary, why would we expect that truth and law, the logic of cooperation and morality, economics and politics, groups and group evolutionary strategy to require less study than the other sciences?

    Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand the science to use the products of it any more than you have to understand quantum mechanics to use the transistors in your cell phone. You have to understand the OUTPUTS of P-Law Science.

    The output of P-Law is expressible as the group evolutionary strategy of the european people when written in p-law. Why? Because the reason europeans invented reason, math, science, technology, and medicine so disproportionately vs all other civs, is that strategy=law=science.

    That translates to individual responsibility, rather than clan, religion, or state responsibility.

    Responsibility provides mindfulness, and mindfulness tolerance for the tragedy of nature’s laws, and the only means of overcoming that tragedy as mastery of and application of those laws for our benefit, by not seeking to avoid, but to conquer those laws.

    So of course, Europeans would not only invent mathematical realism, reason, law proper, philosophy, science and epicureanism, but government, technology, and medicine. The only problem? Many can’t bear that responsibility, lacking ability, agency, and training.

    So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient World, like we allowed Judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern.

    And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it.

    (…more in comments…)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:29:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282022650660535

  • And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn

    And to train it we must KNOW it. We cannot train what we don’t know. And we didn’t (until now with P-Law) understand the ‘science’ of our group strategy, institutions, traditions, norms, rituals. And now that we know that science we can TRAIN the ‘otherwise unfit’ into it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:09:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460278878069477377

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460278283413729280


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1460278283413729280

  • And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic,

    And so, my overall point here is that we cannot have an advanced (aristocratic, responsible, evolutionarily adaptive) civilization without paying the cost of training those who are not naturally fit for it, or in families naturally fit and able to train it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:07:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460278283413729280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460277762342727688


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient world, like we allowed judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1460277762342727688

  • So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or

    So we could as the ancients tried, pay the high cost of training mindfulness or we can pay the cost of NOT training mindfulness – which is what allowed our invasive JChristianity and the destruction of the ancient world, like we allowed judaism-marxism-pomo-pc-woke in the modern.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 16:05:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460277762342727688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460273490288910344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So of course, Europeans would not only invent mathematical realism, reason, law proper, philosophy, science and epicureanism, but government, technology, and medicine. The only problem? Many can’t bear that responsibility, lacking ability, agency, and training.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1460273490288910344

  • Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand

    Now the fact that P-Law requires work, doesn’t mean that you have to understand the science to use the products of it any more than you have to understand quantum mechanics to use the transistors in your cell phone. You have to understand the OUTPUTS of P-Law Science.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 15:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460271793550331904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460271453807562755


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    That said, given the four sciences: Formal(Logics), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary, why would we expect that truth and law, the logic of cooperation and morality, economics and politics, groups and group evolutionary strategy to require less study than the other sciences?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1460271453807562755