THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)Left (Socialist), …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit. …. Consumption Preference, …. Demand Discretionary rule. …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality. …. Result: Dysgenic. -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds) Libertarian (Classical Liberal), …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Generation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty. …. Result: Eugenic Tilt. -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.) Right (Aristocratic), …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Accumulation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity. …. Result: Eugenic. -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs) Voting Patterns Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe. In Simple Terms: Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion. So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies. Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.
Theme: Demonstrated Interests
-
—“Can You Define the Terms Radical Right and Radical Left?”—
THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)Left (Socialist), …. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit. …. Consumption Preference, …. Demand Discretionary rule. …. Values: Exclusively Care, and Proportionality. …. Result: Dysgenic. -> The Radical Left is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Community > Polity > World (Herds) Libertarian (Classical Liberal), …. Ascendent Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Generation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Almost Exclusively Liberty. …. Result: Eugenic Tilt. -> The Radical Libertarians are Activist and NOT willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Individual > Markets. (Solitary Hunters.) Right (Aristocratic), …. Established Male Reproductive Strategy: Meritocracy, …. Capital Accumulation Preference, …. Demand Rule of Law of Reciprocity. …. Values: Complete Spectrum of Care, Proportionality, Loyalty, Hierarchy, Purity. …. Result: Eugenic. -> The Radical Right is Activist and willing to forcibly impose their preferred order: Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Nationalism (Packs) Voting Patterns Underclasses, Minorities, and Single White Women vote Left (self), while White males and MarriedWhite females vote right (family). (See Pew research). White women are the only defectors from their tribe. In Simple Terms: Political choices are intuitionistic because they are too general due to representatives and parties to vote with greater discretion. So we see voting patterns and political affiliation reflect Cognitive biases to advance the feminine dysgenic (herd) reproductive strategy or advance the male eugenic (pack) strategy. This is rather obvious given the difference (vast) in male and female reproductive and survival strategies. Really, That’s the answer. And that’s what all the data tells us. And it’s also why representative democracy is a catastrophe waiting to happen.
-
“CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”— THE CORRECT ANSWER
—“CAN YOU DEFINE THE TERMS RADICAL RIGHT AND RADICAL LEFT?”—
THE CORRECT ANSWER (Really)
Left (Socialist),
…. Female Reproductive Strategy: Equity independent of demonstrated merit…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=277148002882097&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 19:46:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029454177376845826
-
2) You didn’t address the argument; demonstrated you didn’t understand the argum
2) You didn’t address the argument; demonstrated you didn’t understand the argument; accused me of not reading TGT; and brought in the ‘good’ that fiat liquidity targeting achieved postwar, and proceeded to spam correlations. The Good != The True. What capital isn’t measured?
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 22:49:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020078304068620288
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020040028704002048
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020040028704002048
-
TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE DEMONSTRABLY SUPERIOR. I just argue tha
TRUTH IS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR THE DEMONSTRABLY SUPERIOR.
I just argue that truth is also a signal and that superior peoples can in fact use truth for the same purposes (and in general they have). And it’s most important that while inferior groups can use falsehoods, only superior groups can use truth.
Truth is a competitive advantage.
(The opposite is also true. Falsehood is a competitive advantage for the demonstrably inferior.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 10:07:00 UTC
-
Religion vs Cult
—“What is the difference between a cult & religion in practice?”—Zach Edward First, religions and cults consist of a mythos and costly rituals that require demonstration of advocacy (not necessarily belief) in one or more falsehoods as a substitute for reason and a signal of contribution to the group’s informational and as a consequence, behavioral commons. It’s that a religion is adopted at scale and has political influence, and a cult has a smaller scale and does not have political influence. And because a cult differs from the mainstream, and requires higher costs of adherence, members of a cult are generally more devoted than those of a religion or major religion. – Major Religion (influential in a civilization – many governments) – Religion (Influential in a polity – government) – Cult (not influential in a polity or government)
-
Religion vs Cult
—“What is the difference between a cult & religion in practice?”—Zach Edward First, religions and cults consist of a mythos and costly rituals that require demonstration of advocacy (not necessarily belief) in one or more falsehoods as a substitute for reason and a signal of contribution to the group’s informational and as a consequence, behavioral commons. It’s that a religion is adopted at scale and has political influence, and a cult has a smaller scale and does not have political influence. And because a cult differs from the mainstream, and requires higher costs of adherence, members of a cult are generally more devoted than those of a religion or major religion. – Major Religion (influential in a civilization – many governments) – Religion (Influential in a polity – government) – Cult (not influential in a polity or government)
-
no one is brainwashed. he is doing what he said he would o for the people that e
no one is brainwashed. he is doing what he said he would o for the people that elected him.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 01:42:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012511548559036416
Reply addressees: @gigi_picard
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012511030554046465
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012511030554046465
-
Need Demonstrated Behavior: Predatory Criminality, Reproductive Impulsivity, Dem
Need Demonstrated Behavior: Predatory Criminality, Reproductive Impulsivity, Demand for redistribution, (‘Employability’). Harder to explain in a tweet, but selecting for Agency defeats selecting for IQ. Industrious Ethical, Moral People at 90 are employable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-23 20:38:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999389149617623045
Reply addressees: @TheBurkeanOak
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999376356038201344
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/999376356038201344
-
NO, PHILOSOPHY(CHOICE) IS SUBORDINATE TO SCIENCE (TRUTH) Again, economics and la
NO, PHILOSOPHY(CHOICE) IS SUBORDINATE TO SCIENCE (TRUTH)
Again, economics and law, defeat philosophy, religious tradition, and moral justificationism. Demonstrated vs Reported. Always and everywhere.
—“Philosophy is more fundamental than economics. The notion of making choices, based on rewards and punishment, implies some form of ethics, which itself is a branch of philosophy. Economics is not a floating abstract, disconnected from ethics or philosophy.”— Mark Goodkin
It’s actually just physics. Morality=reciprocity, an reciprocity is the only system of measurement a cooperative species can use and survive.
Philosophy allows us to choose preferences, but truth and falsehood are in the domain of science.
Historically this relationship was mistakenly reversed because it threatened the status quo. Philosophy(middle class) like religion (underclass) is just the record of dissatisfaction: opposition literature. The ruling class rules, and they rule by law, and law and economics require reciprocity to fund the requirements for maintaining power.
Science has a great track record. Philosophy has very arguable (if not certainly) done more harm than good. And theology has certainly done more harm than all but malaria and the black plague.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-21 11:59:00 UTC