Theme: Demonstrated Interests

  • CORRECTION (to a meme) Information (measurements)> … Knowledge (paradigm) > ..

    CORRECTION (to a meme)

    Information (measurements)>

    … Knowledge (paradigm) >

    … … Conspiracy of intent (design) >

    … … … Conspiracy of common interest (interest) >

    … … … … Conspiracy of cognitive bias (bias) >

    … … … … … Conspiracy theory ( wishful thinking ) >

    … … … … … … Schizophrenia or psychosis (paranoia)

    Conspiracy of common interest: bureaucracy, marxism, postmodernism, feminism.

    Conspiracy of cognitive bias: females, christians, jews, muslims. (anti-masculinity)

    Conspiracy Theory: that conspiracy of common interest or of cognitive bias, is conspiracy of intent.

    Psychosis: contrails. lizard men. et al.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-23 11:19:00 UTC

  • “Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You c

    —“Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You can claim to be as motivated as you like; but with not fruits, you’d only be demonstrating/ expressing a lie {a claim to motivation you don’t demonstrate}.”–Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 14:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1072867143178305541

  • “Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You c

    —“Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You can claim to be as motivated as you like; but with not fruits, you’d only be demonstrating/ expressing a lie {a claim to motivation you don’t demonstrate}.”–Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 09:53:00 UTC

  • “Inferences can’t be measured, property-en-toto (a demonstrated definition – i.e

    —“Inferences can’t be measured, property-en-toto (a demonstrated definition – i.e. demonstrated interests) can. so no, couching agency isn’t a meta-frame for cults, nor a result of ignorance of the agency-structure interdependence, but rather a matter of calculating agency by its resulting output. (the key point of confusion is the presumption that property is restricted to tangible stuff [materialism] where as property-en-toto includes the intangibles, things like, relationships, goals, identity – anything we invest our time, effort and care into [demonstrated investment])”— Bill Joslin

    Perfect. No one will defeat Bill now.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 09:52:00 UTC

  • So, it is always and everywhere an open question whether one demonstrates convic

    So, it is always and everywhere an open question whether one demonstrates conviction – or convenience (free riding). Pacifism and tolerance and virtue signaling are fairly easy to employ as camouflage for cowardice, free riding, and immorality.

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-21 09:19:00 UTC

  • (Economics describes human behavior by DEMONSTRATION not survey or projection. I

    (Economics describes human behavior by DEMONSTRATION not survey or projection. If you don’t understand economics (behavioral) then whatever you do, your judgement is always the victim of cherry picking.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:36:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059061737654272000

    Reply addressees: @JeffreyASachs

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058412303727685632


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JeffreyASachs

    Here’s a puzzle I think about a lot. If any academic field is associated with the contemporary debate surrounding free speech, it’s psychology. Haidt, Pinker, Peterson, Saad, Jussim, even Lehmann. All specialize or have backgrounds in academic psych.

    So what’s the puzzle?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058412303727685632

  • More From My Portfolio of CEO Responses 1) “You’re right. We should do that. Are

    More From My Portfolio of CEO Responses

    1) “You’re right. We should do that. Are you volunteering to get it done?”

    2) “Really? I have simple means of testing demonstrated preference: He who does, chooses. He who doesn’t, doesn’t.”

    3) “Really, now you don’t understand why I did that? Why do you think I would do that” (Silly reason follows.) “Actually, here is why I did it ….” (Stunned) (Teaching Moment Succeeded).

    4) “Great idea. Given that we must, and do, at all times make use of all available capital, What should we not do in order to pay for doing that?”

    Teaching People to fish never ends. Why? They actually want someone to catch the fish for them.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-28 14:20:00 UTC

  • DEFINE PARASITISM

    October 25th, 2018 8:34 AM —“Q: DEFINE PARASITISM?”—PARASITISM: Violation of Reciprocity by the imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by non physical means: free riding, socialization of losses/privatization of commons, fraud in its host of forms, rent seeking, conspiracy (statism) etc.

  • DEFINE PARASITISM

    October 25th, 2018 8:34 AM —“Q: DEFINE PARASITISM?”—PARASITISM: Violation of Reciprocity by the imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by non physical means: free riding, socialization of losses/privatization of commons, fraud in its host of forms, rent seeking, conspiracy (statism) etc.

  • Man is what he has demonstrated.

    October 25th, 2018 1:49 PM [M]an ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories (sedations) we tell ourselves at any point in history, merely serve to ameliorate our instincts (largely status) in relation to our resources (physical, emotional, mental) budges, and existential resources in all their forms – from physical things to relationships to knowledge. So are you asking “What is man?”, or “What methods of sedation (self medication) has man used through history?” Propertarianism ‘accounts for’ (takes account of): Math, Logic, Science (Physics-Chemistry-Biology, Psychology, Law, Economics, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion, The Occult, the Fictionalisms, and Methods of Deceit. What it most takes account of, and no others do, is the transition of our understanding, knowledge and instrumentation from human scale to pre (supra/below) and post (super/above) human scale. And as such at humans scale (Morality, Instructions, arithmetic(construction), confirmation) we speak in justifications (Via-Positivas) because we can directly apprehend such constant relations, where at below and above human scale (Law, Science, Mathematics(deduction), Falsification) we speak in falsifications (Via-Negativas) because we cannot directly perceive those constant relations with our senses. The world wars (Anglo/Balance and Russian/Expansion Screw Ups) interrupted the darwinian-mengerian-specerian-maxwellian-poincarian-nietzschiean-romanticist revolution. And the 20th century in social science was lost, as the cult-of-dysgenic-socialism found itself in a christ figure versus a darwinian evil of eugenic-national-socialism, which allowed the suppression of the second scientific revolution (in germany). But beginning in the 1990’s science has (slowly) rescued us such that without immigration we would have corrected the problem already.