Dunno man. Demographics. 😉 -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-26 17:45:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243232515629830145
Reply addressees: @DarkHor80884493 @SPQRIUS @RichardBSpencer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1243232181981450240
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.
Operational logic is Demanding https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/operational-logic-is-demanding/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 17:36:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232358815296839681
(core)
Reciprocity = limiting our display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality to the action, and warrantied within the limits of the actors’ capacity for restitution, between those who demonstrate, promise, imply, or expect exchange of reciprocity. As far as I know, that is the logical, empirical, biologically necessary, genetically necessary and complete definition of morality, for conscious beings, and there are no cases under which the definition fails. Some people will try to conflate the moral and the good, where good consists of an additional investment in addition to not violating reciprocity – but this demands involuntary transfer from others, and violates reciprocity. Some people will try to demand involuntary exchange of a promise of reciprocity from those who do not offer it – but an enemy is nothing more than an enemy who will not engage in reciprocity. Some people will argue this is a binary condition rather than an agreement, under which we match their level of reciprocity and irreciprocity. But while we seek perfect reciprocity, we rarely obtain it. In international trade and in politics we all but never obtain reciprocity, instead we exchange selective reciprocities and irreciprocities within our tolerance for continued cooperation, boycott, or war. Some people will try to demand reciprocity in war between groups, between whom the exchange of reciprocity has been withdrawn, but this demand violates reciprocity. Humans demonstrate the minimum morality that they can get away with without provoking altruistic punishment from others. Humans possess extraordinary abilities of accounting for debts and credits with others, our relative status, status differences, and the tendency of people to engage in moral or immoral behavior.
(core)
Reciprocity = limiting our display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality to the action, and warrantied within the limits of the actors’ capacity for restitution, between those who demonstrate, promise, imply, or expect exchange of reciprocity. As far as I know, that is the logical, empirical, biologically necessary, genetically necessary and complete definition of morality, for conscious beings, and there are no cases under which the definition fails. Some people will try to conflate the moral and the good, where good consists of an additional investment in addition to not violating reciprocity – but this demands involuntary transfer from others, and violates reciprocity. Some people will try to demand involuntary exchange of a promise of reciprocity from those who do not offer it – but an enemy is nothing more than an enemy who will not engage in reciprocity. Some people will argue this is a binary condition rather than an agreement, under which we match their level of reciprocity and irreciprocity. But while we seek perfect reciprocity, we rarely obtain it. In international trade and in politics we all but never obtain reciprocity, instead we exchange selective reciprocities and irreciprocities within our tolerance for continued cooperation, boycott, or war. Some people will try to demand reciprocity in war between groups, between whom the exchange of reciprocity has been withdrawn, but this demand violates reciprocity. Humans demonstrate the minimum morality that they can get away with without provoking altruistic punishment from others. Humans possess extraordinary abilities of accounting for debts and credits with others, our relative status, status differences, and the tendency of people to engage in moral or immoral behavior.
Claims must be demonstrated.
It will be very difficult to dispute anything I say. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 23:21:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232083137435447296
Reply addressees: @WinslowFrancke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232082306870935553
The 1% turns out to be a lot of people over time. There are however, a large number of people in the financial, state, academy, media and entertainment sectors that share common interests in ‘managed decline’ of our civilization. And a small number of internationalists doing it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-24 20:22:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232037996213493761
Reply addressees: @StandUniteFight @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231800422966403072
DEFINITION OF MORALITY
Morality = Reciprocity
Reciprocity = limiting our display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality to the action, and warrantied within the limits of the actors’ capacity for restitution, between those who demonstrate, promise, imply, or expect exchange of reciprocity.
As far as I know, that is the logical, empirical, biologically necessary, genetically necessary and complete definition of morality, for conscious beings, and there are no cases under which the definition fails.
Some people will try to conflate the moral and the good, where good consists of an additional investment in addition to not violating reciprocity – but this demands involuntary transfer from others, and violates reciprocity.
Some people will try to demand involuntary exchange of a promise of reciprocity from those who do not offer it – but an enemy is nothing more than an enemy who will not engage in reciprocity.
Some people will argue this is a binary condition rather than an agreement, under which we match their level of reciprocity and irreciprocity. But while we seek perfect reciprocity, we rarely obtain it. In international trade and in politics we all but never obtain reciprocity, instead we exchange selective reciprocities and irreciprocities within our tolerance for continued cooperation, boycott, or war.
Some people will try to demand reciprocity in war between groups, between whom the exchange of reciprocity has been withdrawn, but this demand violates reciprocity.
Humans demonstrate the minimum morality that they can get away with without provoking altruistic punishment from others.
Humans possess extraordinary abilities of accounting for debts and credits with others, our relative status, status differences, and the tendency of people to engage in moral or immoral behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 07:02:00 UTC
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITY
Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability.
Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.
MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM
… … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake)
… … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain
… … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain
… Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain
Amoral – no affect on others at gain.
… Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain
… … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain
… … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain
… … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake)
The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 09:39:00 UTC