Curt Doolittle

Theme: Demonstrated Interests

  • Great Question 0) Question poses the interesting error of populism suggesting th

    Great Question
    0) Question poses the interesting error of populism suggesting the because more people like it it’s better, vs what is the demonstrated evolutionary economic and intellectual result of what they like.

    Reasons For Western Vulnerability
    1) Wealth problem – as wealth increases class opportunity increases, and this requires decades to generations to develop institutions and norms to accommodate.
    2) women introduced into politics – decline is entirely the result of women’s voting. Without women we’d never have had any ‘Progressive’ governments.
    3) Jewish postwar ‘march through western institutions of cultural production’ of individual responsibility. Marxist-to-woke sequence.
    4) “Hole” in western trifunctionalism and law that tolerates baiting into hazard – the means by which the Abrahamic religions both supernatural and modern marxist pseudoscientific ‘bait’ women and underclasses.
    5) Small percentage of the world – east Asia and western Europe have high enough IQ’s over 100 for secular humanitarianism stoicism and science.
    6) Islam appeals to low IQ demographics: 84 IQ average meaning that half or more of the population is incapable of western levels of education cooperation and skills.

    That’s the answer and it’s not complicated.
    Also see my post above on european vs semitic brain structure. We are waiting for genetics to confirm that semitic speakers (afro asiatics) as well as all MENA (south eurasians) are from an earlier generation of man with lower neotenic evolution. (Which is obvious we just need the science to ‘overcome’ resistance to publishing it.)

    Reply addressees: @EdwardSpruit @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 17:51:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680273984812662785

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680270274225221633

  • That’s extremely unlikely. Instead you are emphasizing your interests over the a

    That’s extremely unlikely. Instead you are emphasizing your interests over the answer I was providing. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 18:39:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675212552433745921

    Reply addressees: @CrispinFitheler

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675211983384375296

  • MORE ON INDIA VS FUTURE US RELATIONS He’s stating that india was never a friend

    MORE ON INDIA VS FUTURE US RELATIONS

    He’s stating that india was never a friend or ally, it was just in her interest at the moment when we were facilitating free trade and the transcendence of lesser developed peoples into industrial technological and rule of law societies ending the age of empires.

    So given india will not assist us geostrategically in preserving that order, and given that india is capable of domestic production and consumption for relative independence from that order, the only alliance or assistance we should expect from india is with china, who is perpetual threat to india right next door. even then, India will only allow us to assist them, they won’t assist us.

    Ergo india will drop off the favored nation status because (like france) she is self interested to the point of harming alliances, and like france is sufficiently autarkic not to need them.

    And Modi is a populist but a grifter with a long history of corruption, playing the religous identity card, so he is assisting in driving this process.

    In general, the world we spent blood and treasure to build is coming apart because we were not brutal enough in completing the second world war by eradicating communism in russia and china, and by ending colonialism we caused the europeans to create states from their empires that did not reflect the requirements to facilitate the formation of enthostates with less internal conflict,and more prone to federations.

    And war with Mexico is going to happen. 😉 Possibly because their president is agitating in favor of it, while the american people are increasingly demanding it, in part because china is facilitating it.

    Reply addressees: @Will_Benge

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 13:47:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671877657292570624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671870999825108993

  • Any minority always asserts self interest as their percentage of the population

    Any minority always asserts self interest as their percentage of the population increases. And more so if they are successfully competitive witin the host peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 15:39:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671543439979081733

    Reply addressees: @SovereigntyKing

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671541874685882369

  • THE AMERICAN SPIRIT IN ECONOMIC (SCIENTIFIC) TERMS The pursuit of status and sel

    THE AMERICAN SPIRIT IN ECONOMIC (SCIENTIFIC) TERMS
    The pursuit of status and self image through responsibility demonstrated by heroism (risk) and responsibility (risk) demonstrated through heroism as a contribution of responsibility to the commons, and contribution of responsibility to the commons creates the high trust society that reduces all transaction (cooperation), capital, and maintenance costs for all – as such exhaustive responsibility for private and common produces cooperative (economic) velocity and reduces political friction, allowing cooperative participatory government, limited to the need for rule by natural, common, concurrent law.

    It’s just science. It’s also the most intellectually, psychologically, emotionally, and demanding civilization to live in, and it’s why the feminine left rebels against that responsibiliy: the purpose of the female instinct is to maximize hyperconsumption at minimum responsibility for commons, because responsibility for commons presents an opportunity for conflict, and conflict for harm, and this is contrary to feminine instinct whoch evolved for no other purpose than to extend her nervous system over a passle of children and ensure her ability to protect their fragile lives and survive into self determinant adulthood.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:27:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670075785267367936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670071683716198400

  • A criticism from JC Bryant who thinks sophistry in political analysis and sarcas

    A criticism from JC Bryant who thinks sophistry in political analysis and sarcasm in political insult are a sufficient substitute for demonstrated competency and intelligence.
    For example, JCB’s tedious criticism of conservatism, and vapid praise of the new age.
    Conservatism(capitalization) is reducible to the male (not you) extreme bias, and progressivism (consumption) the female extreme bias. The terms are statements of bias in the use of capital. With the central institutions of the West dating back to the steppe, the ongoing conservative demand for the preservation of those institutions for the single purpose of maximizing individual responsibility, prohibiting hubris (you), given the demonstrated tendency of man toward parasitism (feminine, progressive, leftism), which led to aristocracy, church, and peasantry a consistent barrier to the rise of the middle class – who has the only demonstrated moral incentives and resulting moral character.

    While under agrarianism, even small subsistence farmers were effectively entrepreneurs, but lacking the ability to scale, and extracted from by state and church, the industrial age and now the technological age have given a vast opportunity for people to exit the market into commercial employment or worse, academy, and state employment, where they have restored the parasitism of the aristocracy, of the church, and thru immigration and redistribution the peasantry.

    Now, if you studied something valuable with your Ph.D. like neuroscience, artificial intelligence, economics, and law, then you’d work from the evidence of man’s constitution and his behavior – good and bad – and at individual and large scale.

    But no. You’re living with the delusion of insight obscured by your shallow success with ridicule and wit, which is of course, the feminine, progressive, left’s use of female undermining, social construction, and critique because, they (you) lack the knowledge competency and insight to produce solutions that contribute to innovation, adaptation, and evolution, and continue our long tradition of outpacing the rate of development of the entire world in the bronze, iron, and now steel ages.

    So before you ridicule what you not only do not comprehend and may not possibly be able to comprehend, look in the mirror and don’t antagonize your betters with your pretension of other than cunning.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @jcallahanbryant @Thaeus4

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 20:02:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669435157189652483

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669417242281537536

  • Q: “Curt: What is the unit of account according to which the spectrum of demonst

    Q: “Curt: What is the unit of account according to which the spectrum of demonstrated interests is commensurable? Pricing these areas of dispute doesn’t seem to be an exact science.”

    Great question.

    There are no utils nor prices in subjective value – just voluntary reciprocity or not. This is because time is the universal asset of scarcity, and time is of different value at different times in different circumstances to each of us. And all demonstrated interests (from concrete to abstract objects) store different amounts of relative time. This is the reason for subjective value and the variation in subjective value by time, place, individual, and his inventory.

    So the only means of testing value is voluntary transfer (exchange). Because all individuals use personal weights and measures. As such it’s the ACTION(change) of exchange not the STATE of the asset or demonstrated interests that provides us with information.

    All we know is that people seek to acquire, preserve, transform, trade, and consume demonstrated interests as a means of defeating entropy in time.

    So we can catalog demonstrated interest by empirical observation(we have). Because people seek to acquire and defend demonstrated interests. And they seek restitution, punishment and prevention of those demonstrated interests when that interest is violated. In other words this is a purely empirical (scientific) question. (Empirical means observable and recordable).

    And we can observe that all human behavior is reducible to statements of acquiring, preserving, transforming, exchanging, and consuming demonstrated interests.

    So contrary to Utils and Prices, which are cardinal measures, human behavior is measured ordinally by ordinal name (term, not number), and determined by triangulation, not cardinal position or number.

    And cardinal measures such as prices are the floating measure of relative value in markets (populations) of distributed interest in goods, services, information, or opportunity, whether private, semi-private, or common.

    Prices only aggregate a distribution of the value of time to individuals that produces a voluntary exchange, and not a universal value or absolute measure of anything.

    Reply addressees: @godotnik

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 20:16:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668713902325092355

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668700012442779649

  • Natural Law Lesson Of The Day: Natural Law of Self Determination of each and all

    Natural Law Lesson Of The Day:
    Natural Law of Self Determination
    of each and all of the people
    insuring one another by Force of Arms,
    in Sovereignty in demonstrated interests
    and Reciprocity in Display Word and Deed
    Requiring Commonality in Dispute Resolution
    Requiring Concurrency in Contracts of the Commons
    Requiring Trifunctionality in institutions
    Of Care(religion), Decision(Law), and Order(state).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-10 20:06:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667624367272910848

  • Ah, appeal to credential authority rather than demonstrated capacity? How sophom

    Ah, appeal to credential authority rather than demonstrated capacity? How sophomoric.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-01 04:12:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664122678268108800

    Reply addressees: @Chewbaccasbeard @SwipeWright

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1664121726777581569

  • She blocked me for asking the obvious question: what is the priority of your loy

    She blocked me for asking the obvious question: what is the priority of your loyalty?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 13:38:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656655005636603906

    Reply addressees: @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656650876583559173