Once you understand that we are “The People of The Law” and that “Truth is enough” and “Via Negativa” produces markets that calculate what a man cannot reason, the rest will fall into place. It is simply difficult to acquire those three cognitive habits.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 02:30:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061446109183262720
—You’re still a moralist and I’m a legalist. The difference is the arbitrariness and imprecision of your position and non-arbitrariness and precision of mine. Ergo I am more confident because I am not troubled by lack of clarity – because I have none.–
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 00:01:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1061046046770581504
DECIDABILITY, MYTHOS, AND THE LAW
(the demand for national mythos)
Um. when the atheists attack mythology – abrahamic or otherwise – they do not specify the means of graceful failure of decidability that mythos provide. That’s why one needs a founding mythos. Because there must exists some means of decision making in the absence of knowledge.
Hence why I argue for Self Authoring in the Virtues, and for the western historical ‘mythology’ of transcendence (progress into godhood). But what do we teach as decidability?
One needs an aspiration or it is impossible to construct a complete set of decidability. (really. It is. Sorry).
However, with that aspiration, the law is enough. The law brings us transcendence into gods, and into mystery of the universe.
The law is enough because it will produce transcendence. transcendence likewise will produce the law. So whether bottom up or top down we produce the combination of the law, ascendence, transcendence.
The Natural Law. The White Law. Reciprocity, and a canon of precompiled arguments for nearly every category of human decision making.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 18:40:00 UTC
(the demand for national mythos) Um. when the atheists attack mythology – abrahamic or otherwise – they do not specify the means of graceful failure of decidability that mythos provide. That’s why one needs a founding mythos. Because there must exists some means of decision making in the absence of knowledge. Hence why I argue for Self Authoring in the Virtues, and for the western historical ‘mythology’ of transcendence (progress into godhood). But what do we teach as decidability? One needs an aspiration or it is impossible to construct a complete set of decidability. (really. It is. Sorry). However, with that aspiration, the law is enough. The law brings us transcendence into gods, and into mystery of the universe. The law is enough because it will produce transcendence. transcendence likewise will produce the law. So whether bottom up or top down we produce the combination of the law, ascendence, transcendence. The Natural Law. The White Law. Reciprocity, and a canon of precompiled arguments for nearly every category of human decision making.
The Coming Civil War: Parasite & Predate vs Produce & Perform.
by James Santagata
The first Civil War featured two core European populations fighting each other, and although there were genetic differences which manifested themselves in cultural and cognitive terms (IQ), the range of and delta between the genetic stocks were almost non-existent compared to the genetic differences today along with the hyper-growth of an underclass within the European gene pools.
Yet even with such narrow differences, compared to today, war crimes occurred with frequency, including Sherman’s March to the Sea which was a wholesale campaign of rape, fire, murder and destruction to the sea — with similar tribes vs similar tribes.
Now consider today’s tossed-salad populations, The range of genetic stock and it’s physical manifestations in terms of reproduction strategies (K vs R-selected) and cultural and cognitive capabilities is unfathomable.
As such, the strategies pursued by each core tribe and their ability to produce and perform, set against their propensity to engage or suppress parasitism and predation varies greatly.
Today, the R- vs K-selected gene pools yield such huge IQ deltas cultural and cognitively that the differences are irreconcilable. Bloody clashes will be the result.
It the Parasite & Predate strategy vs the Produce & Perform strategy all driven by and informed by genetics.
—You’re still a moralist and I’m a legalist. The difference is the arbitrariness and imprecision of your position and non-arbitrariness and precision of mine. Ergo I am more confident because I am not troubled by lack of clarity – because I have none.–
(the demand for national mythos) Um. when the atheists attack mythology – abrahamic or otherwise – they do not specify the means of graceful failure of decidability that mythos provide. That’s why one needs a founding mythos. Because there must exists some means of decision making in the absence of knowledge. Hence why I argue for Self Authoring in the Virtues, and for the western historical ‘mythology’ of transcendence (progress into godhood). But what do we teach as decidability? One needs an aspiration or it is impossible to construct a complete set of decidability. (really. It is. Sorry). However, with that aspiration, the law is enough. The law brings us transcendence into gods, and into mystery of the universe. The law is enough because it will produce transcendence. transcendence likewise will produce the law. So whether bottom up or top down we produce the combination of the law, ascendence, transcendence. The Natural Law. The White Law. Reciprocity, and a canon of precompiled arguments for nearly every category of human decision making.
—You’re still a moralist and I’m a legalist. The difference is the arbitrariness and imprecision of your position and non-arbitrariness and precision of mine. Ergo I am more confident because I am not troubled by lack of clarity – because I have none.–
Um. You know. If i asked you “How would you go about creating a value-neutral, cross-disciplinary, fully commensurable language that could survive in court under testimony in all matters of conflict.”, I’ll bet you can’t even begin to imagine where to start and how to go about it.
So yeah, that’s Propertarianism (or that’s the spectrum within Propertarianism, including vitruvianism->metaphysics, acquisitionism->psychology, compatibilism->sociology, propertarianism->ethics, testimonialism->epistemology, and algorithmic natural law->politics). And it includes reformation of every one of the grammars (disciplines).
So of COURSE you aren’t going to understand THAT LANGUAGE off the bat. You aren’t going to understand how to convert from IDEAL language (pretense of knowledge) we use today to REAL language (demonstrating knowledge).
Worse you are not going to understand how to convert your thinking from simple human scale justification, to post human scale via negativa falsification, and finally into well formed statements in operational language.
So please don’t waste my time until you catch up to the people who HAVE done so.
Ok. Yeah. Thanks. sigh…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 15:16:00 UTC
Um. You know. If i asked you “How would you go about creating a value-neutral, cross-disciplinary, fully commensurable language that could survive in court under testimony in all matters of conflict.”, I’ll bet you can’t even begin to imagine where to start and how to go about it. So yeah, that’s Propertarianism (or that’s the spectrum within Propertarianism, including vitruvianism->metaphysics, acquisitionism->psychology, compatibilism->sociology, propertarianism->ethics, testimonialism->epistemology, and algorithmic natural law->politics). And it includes reformation of every one of the grammars (disciplines). So of COURSE you aren’t going to understand THAT LANGUAGE off the bat. You aren’t going to understand how to convert from IDEAL language (pretense of knowledge) we use today to REAL language (demonstrating knowledge). Worse you are not going to understand how to convert your thinking from simple human scale justification, to post human scale via negativa falsification, and finally into well formed statements in operational language. So please don’t waste my time until you catch up to the people who HAVE done so. Ok. Yeah. Thanks. sigh…