RT @NoahRevoy: The most evil enemy is the one that weaponizes your virtue against you.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-12 00:26:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712263348383842375
RT @NoahRevoy: The most evil enemy is the one that weaponizes your virtue against you.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-12 00:26:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712263348383842375
Dogs are loyal. Women are not.
It’s a projection. Yes we notice other women. But women are more likely to cheat than men, they are just better at hiding it.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 23:49:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712254182026039617
Reply addressees: @JohnJayDale
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712252817170145735
Because (a) always by reflecting the opponent’s manner, and do not let the opponent claim standing he does not posses, or deny is malfeasance (b) You are confused because you do not understand that morality is an absolute (sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty), but that reciprocity is contingent upon civilizational norms. (c) western civilizational norms prohibit the deception you are attempting to enage in, and as such I am merely stating your crimes.
I am an anglo analytic philosopher and social scientist specializing in cognitive science, behavioral economics, and legal decidability. Of course I sound analytic and scientific.
Likewise you might read:
https://t.co/Qz3MFI3RFI
Reply addressees: @ratjadi
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 22:10:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712229284276805632
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712226333311279165
Always and everywhere the word salad accusation is nothing other than and admission of ignorance and a pretense of competence.
If you had an argument you would make one – but you don’t.
If you had something to recommend, I recommend science not philosophy becuase it’s been dead since Darwin. While technically I’m a Philospoher and social scientists, that’s only because we haven’t recognized that epistemology is a science now, and epistemology and logic like natural philosophy, are fully demarkated leaving philosophy to nothing but the choice of preferencdes and goods among the willing.
Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 17:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712161419318173696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712159523841200633
Do your reseach. The Maoists destroyed almost every remnant of classical civilization. Even then the narrative is false. China has been through more rolling wars, conquests, and revisions than the west, and is nearly as bad and fragile as each subsequent wave of conquerors both before and Islam. Always achieving the same end: parasitism, devolution, ignorance, and dysgenia. Instead Chinese civilization is ‘new’ in the sense that it began with Mao and is still trying to escape leninism-maoism so that the elites can continue to prey on the hard working people, just as the russian elites prey on their people. And just as over the past seventy years, the elites in the west have marched toward preying on the people as all elites eventually try to do – which is why the overproduction of pseudo-elites always ends in calcification and collapse.
If you do not know these things you are unfit to speak to me about anything with any assertion of opinion. Instead ask questions. I think the world would be a lot better off if it just watched @Whatifalthist’s and @Caspianreport’s videos two or three times through, and @PeterZeihan’s coverage of at least Russia and China.
For the jewish vs european conflict conundrum the publications are suppressed but while the medieval to early modern era cast the conflict as spiritual, we now undersetand it is genetic, cultural, strategic, and a method of parasitic colonialism using the female method of warfare. Historically we have post-spiricual authors: Joly(FR), Belloc(UK), Solzhenitsyn(RU), Ramsay(UK), Ginsberg(Jewish), MacDonald(US). My refinement over Macdonald is scientific and technical where his is historical – my advantage being the age of computation and my specialization in aritifical intelligence, cognitive science, behavioral economics and legal decidability is very different from his work in intellectual history and psychology. The fact that we independently came to the same conclusions using different methodologies is just further confirmation of the validity of our work.
You should take comfort in the fact that if you are jewish and you are hostile to western civilization, then it’s largely genetic and cultural. And that by reforming our laws to prohibit feminine means of antisocial, parasitic, seditious and treasonous behavior, we can force a long overdue reformation in Jewish culture – the result would be, as we saw pre-war, a marginal indifference between scottish presbyterians and reformed jews.
We can live together in peace. But peace without parasitism. And a demand for loyalty that the feminine appear not to be able to bear, and the jews have resisted for over two thousand years.
Reply addressees: @ratjadi
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 16:27:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712142945212588036
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712123554836205640
THE UNIVERSAL RESPONSE TO LEFTIST ACCUSATION
I should just write a macro to automatically post this in response to 99% of critics, most of whom argue using the feminine means of deception, and none of whom are competent or intellectually honest. The frew others are moral but… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1712132849510273532
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 15:51:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712133887092998209
You are welcome to try to debate me on the matter but you will fail as all others do. I have not had a single person succeed in doing anything other than various attempts at distraction and character assassination (the latter which is quite hard to accomplish given my history.)
My goal is to eliminate human conflict limiting us to truthful reciprocal cooperation at scale. It is the most moral goal available to man. It is also the most challenging.
So your accusations are meaningless. I know that if you had an argument you would make it. Because even people who are wrong, but intellectually honest try an intellectually honest argument.
You don’t. And you probably can’t. That’s why I know you are niether competent, moral, or intellectually honest.
My work on the truth, has taught me a great deal about not onlly human lying, but sex differences in lying, and how civilizations evolve to justify their group evolutionary strategy by appealing to sex differences in lying.
This is why you are as transparent as a kindergardener.
Cheers.
Reply addressees: @ratjadi
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 15:47:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712132849367756800
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712124719871246621
I just do the science and the truth. My goal is to improve life for everyone. But lying and denying doesn’t help at all. So stop.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 03:44:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711950947272863958
Reply addressees: @Adc_Van_Dimsal @_amitbehere
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711949928283398639
We must forgive the average people for their resorting to false perception of equality, of equality of values, the false promises of democdracy, and thus relying on moral habit and intuition. They do the best they can with the worthless education we have allowed them to be victimized by. So yes, there are two sad truths: that the most willing to use violence determine the terms of peace, and that our people are sufficiently ignorant (by design) that they cannot see that obvious fact.
Reply addressees: @adventuregirl @scottre26776207 @AmiDar
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 03:27:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711946495644020736
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711937094992748585
There are psychos on your end of the spectrum. In fact, your conspiracy theory is the masculine version of the feminine oppression narrative. The difference is they’re just feminine. You’re dark triad personality types – psychos.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-10 16:20:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711778790899319070
Reply addressees: @GothHulk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711753309391089739