Theme: Deception

  • Political Argument: The Correct Answer (and a Painful Truth)

    (dysgenia requires theft and deceit) —-“How can you present facts in a political conversation without sounding biased? (https://www.quora.com/How-can-you-present-facts-in-a-political-conversation-without-sounding-biased)?”—- By **explaining both sides **and demonstrating that your argument remains superior in some way or other, or explaining that the other’s argument relies upon **falsehood or theft **…. which is what you should always do anyway. **Truth** is a bias, it is just a decidable bias instead of a preferential one. **Theft** (involuntary transfer) and moralizing (using guilt as means of forcing involuntary transfer) is decidable, and not a bias. Demonstrate that an argument is either **false** or causes i**nvoluntary transfer** (imposition of costs upon the demonstrated investments of others) and you have covered the two decision criteria that are not open to opinion. The sophist will attempt to argue for a good. A **preference** or a **good** is subjective. Anything that is not false or involuntary (directly or indirectly) is a candidate good. That something is a candidate good does not mean one can engage in **falsehood, ridicule, shaming, rallying, and involuntary transfer** in order to achieve that candidate good. It is very difficult to argue against **Truth and Voluntary Exchange**, using advocacy of **Falsehood, Shaming, and Thef**t. Explaining to people they are engaged in falsehood, coercion, and attempted theft produces humiliation. But it wins the argument. It just so happens that the **majority of arguments **in favor of preferences and candidate goods are made by falsehoods, shaming and theft, rather than truths and voluntary exchanges. **All political differences **are determined reducible to preferences for **dysgenic** (irresponsible reproduction) that forces the costs of one’s decisions on the polity, and **eugenic** (responsible reproduction) that forces one to bear the costs of one’s decisions. The reason being that the female and underclass incentive is dysgenic (The Equalitarian Herd), and the male and middle and upper class incentive is eugenic (The Meritocratic Packs). With the general outcome being the military and entrepreneurial class aligning with the working, middle, and upper middle classes, while the priestly, academic, and political classes aligning with the underclasses. In other words, **the immoral top and bottom against the moral middle.** Since **dysgenia depends upon theft**, it is usually argued falsely, which is why **marxism** (pseudoscience) and **postmodernism** (pseudo-rationalism), and **feminism** (pseudo-moralism) were invented to circumvent Darwin (biological evolution), Spencer (social evolution), and Nietzsche (moral evolution). **Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism: They needed an elaborate set of lies.**

  • My answer to How can you present facts in a political conversation without sound

    My answer to How can you present facts in a political conversation without sounding biased? https://www.quora.com/How-can-you-present-facts-in-a-political-conversation-without-sounding-biased/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=5cf7edd3


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 15:58:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030484032944001024

  • “Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”— THE CORRECT ANSWER

    —“Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    —”Who is driving social Marxism across the globe, and why?”—-

    If you mean Cultural Marxism, then that was the third generational failure of the Ashkenazi Jews:

    1 – Labor Communism (Marx), Generation 1

    2 – State Socialism (Trotsky/Lenin/Mao/(Many), Generation 2

    3 – Academic Cultural Marxism (The Frankfurt School: Adorno et al.). Generation 3

    4 – But upon the failure of all three the French supplied Postmodernism (Derrida, Foucault), and all the university, media, and state actors that had over-invested in the three generational failures of marxism converted to postmodernism.

    Postmodernism states that there is no truth, no science, no reason, only power, and as such, by use of ideology, propaganda, academy, and media, the ‘Revolution’ against meritocracy (western civilization) can be achieved by the power of words and voting instead of by ideas, science, reason, and achievement.

    It’s worth noting that The French (always europe’s enemy) had the most authoritarian government in Europe prior to its revolution, the most authoritarian after the revolution, and remains the most authoritarian in Europe today. With Rousseau providing the authoritarian arguments. Arguments that were first copied by the (timid) Germans, then the Rebellious Ashkenazis (Marxists). And horridly implemented by the Soviets, the Maoists, and the Cambodians. And still the cause of South American and Indian poverty.

    5 – If we look at the chief propagandists in the west, it’s single women, immigrants, the lower middle class, lower class, underclass, and American jews. As always since American jews are superior competitors in verbal presentation, they provide a disproportionate influence in Entertainment, Entertainment Media, News, Pseudosciences, and Propaganda. (This is easily measured by random sampling of authors of daily propaganda.)

    Note: Read Paul Fussel’s “Class” for an improvement on marxist class theory. It’s Fussel’s categories I refer to, because they roughly reflect (a) occupational hierarchy, (b) IQ hierarchy, and as such, they match the data.

    “Defectors”

    One thing I did not expect was that while the majority of white americans are of german decent (not english), the germans are MUCH LESS likely to serve the country in the military, and the burden is HEAVILY born by the Anglo – Scotts-Irish demographics. Likewise, the Germans and the Puritans of New England are more likely to ‘defect’ into marxism, socialism, postmodernism, and the Scandinavians of the north central even more likely to defect.

    Note: a friend counsels that the ‘defect’ has been on the continent forever, and goes back to Heraclitus. So the ‘defect’ we see in German Americans, if not all but anglo-scots-iris (southerners). And therefore the question is, what is this defect, and how do we name it operationally?

    (Really)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 14:16:00 UTC

  • THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM —“What’s the unbiased pros and

    THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM

    —“What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capitalism?”—

    Each proposes a MONOPOLY, just as the abrahamic religions proposed a MONOPOLY – all monopolies are bad (and all monopolistic arguments are false)

    The only possible economic structure is a Mixed Economy, and the only structure that every has existed at any scale is a mixed economy.

    The underclass requires redistribution because they have no ability to participate in the market. Labor requires insurance against the vicissitudes of manual labor, the clerical and managerial classes require commons in order to produce multiples, the professional and entrepreneurial class require property and rule of law in order to produce the voluntary organization of production, the financial and political classes need organization such that they can produce redistribution, insurance, and property rights, so that all the classes can function as producers and consumers and parents and elderly.

    THE TRUTH OF RULE OF LAW VS RULE BY DISCRETION(MAN)

    If you practice rule of law – meaning the natural law of torts (not legislation, which is not law, but either contract or command. And commands are not laws, but commands alone), then you will produce a mixed economy.

    If you practice discretionary rule or legislative rule you will produce failed attempts at the MONOPOLIES of communism (underclass) socialism (working class), or capitalism (middle and upper middle class). When instead we require communism (redistribution), socialism (production of commons), and capitalism (production of goods, services, and information) in EVERY economy.

    THE ASHKENAZI (Authoritarian) VS EUROPEAN (Rule of Law ) DEBATE

    1 – Germanics (Masculine) : Rule of Law and Mixed economies.

    2 – French (Feminine): Republican Socialism

    3 – Ashekanazi (authoritarian): Communism, Libertarianism, Neo-Conservatissm.

    4 – Ashkenazi-Russian-Chinese (Authoritarian) : Communism, Socialism.

    However, the Ashkenazi and the French are the intellectual vanguard of authoritarianism, having produced every variation from Rousseau to the Postmodernists, and Marx/Boas/Freud/Cantor/Trostsky/Lenin/Mises/Rothbard all the way to the Frankfurt school.

    While the french retaliated against the english use of empiricism with their nonsense rationalism, and the germans imitated Rousseau with their nonsense moralism, it was the Ashkenazi of Europe, Russia, and America, who weaponized pseudoscience and propaganda against western civilization by creating pseudoscientific cults with false promise of economic and political paradise just as they had done so in the ancient world with false promise of life after death.

    Every time you ask the question which is better you are demonstrating that you have been the victim of a pseudoscientific cult in the modern world, just as your ancestors were the victims of supernatural cults in the anceient world.

    The only economy possible is a mixed economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 13:14:00 UTC

  • Spring Eli Harman Quotes

    –If my ancestors did anything bad to yours, the fact that you’re complaining about it just means it wasn’t bad enough. It’s never too late to rectify their oversight…– –Crimes of a genocidal nature we will punish with death, not just of the perpetrator, but of everyone related to the perpetrator. It’s the only way to reciprocate.– —“A few grams of lead, administered fast enough, will cure most addictions.”—Eli Harman —“People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, to reduce conflict between parties willing to reciprocate a minimum level of basic respect, and have universalized it into an absolute principle. But all principles are valid only within limits.”— Eli Harman —The “tolerance” ideology is actually just gussied up intolerance rooted in hatred. This is obvious from the fact that “tolerance” is extended only to certain, protected, categories and denied to select others, whom this one-way “tolerance” is merely a weapon against. Whites must tolerate non whites. Men must tolerate women. Straights must tolerate gays. But the reverse is never true. Nobody ever need tolerate straight white males, and we may be punished and excluded with impunity, according to this ideology, which originates in hatred and envy directed specifically at us and aimed at our destruction. And while our enemies virtue signal about “love” (meaning their hate) conquering “intolerance” (meaning normalcy, virtue, tradition, homogeneity, borders, Eugenia, and everything else worthy and good) we know that the only thing which can beat genuine intolerance is even more intolerance…— —“Understanding is hard. Obedience is easy. This is partially reversed if you’re autistic, but probably not fully.”— Ely Harman —“It’s only worthwhile to argue equality from a position of inferiority.”—Ely Harman —If resources (power, territory, capital, subject population) are being mismanaged, then entrepreneurs of violence can profit by taking them over and putting them to more productive or sustainable uses.–Eli Harman —“Appeasement is not a winning strategy.”— Ely Harman —“Paganism is the monarchy and aristocracy of the gods. The intertemporal model we seek to both emulate and avoid the hubris of.”– Eli Harman —“Permissiveness and promiscuity haven’t done anything good for Western societies. We’ve just been able to afford more of them by spending down capital accumulated through past repression.”— Ely Harman —“Postmodernism is the 5th Abrahamic revolt against Western Reason, Empiricism, Aristocracy, and Eugenia – their ongoing struggle to drag humanity back into ignorance, poverty, disease, filth, parasitism and superstition:. The 1st, Judaism; 2nd Christianity; 3rd, Islam; 4th, classical, Marxist, pseudoscientific, Socialism; 5th, Postmodern, cultural Marxist, critical theory and intersectional socialism.” — Eli Harman —“The inescapable, inexorable, distributed dictatorship of free men…”—Ely Harman —“Incremental Suppression is a marginal approach to enforcement, a bologna slice strategy. If you are powerful, you identify the most egregious instances of violation and go after those first, working your way down the list until it’s no longer worth the cost. If you are not powerful, you identify the violators within your reach and begin suppressing them, working your way outward as your power grows and your enemies’ diminish.” —- Ely Harman —“Nobody makes it off this world alive. We differ mainly in how many assholes we take with us. So be a high-scoring hero. Don’t be a low-scoring chump – or worse still, a no scoring zero.”— Eli Harman —“The 2nd Amendment isn’t written with pen and ink on paper, but with fire and fury in the hearts and souls of men and with lead and blood in the dust of the ground.”— Ely Harman      

  • Spring Eli Harman Quotes

    –If my ancestors did anything bad to yours, the fact that you’re complaining about it just means it wasn’t bad enough. It’s never too late to rectify their oversight…– –Crimes of a genocidal nature we will punish with death, not just of the perpetrator, but of everyone related to the perpetrator. It’s the only way to reciprocate.– —“A few grams of lead, administered fast enough, will cure most addictions.”—Eli Harman —“People have lost sight of the origin and purpose of tolerance and secularism, to reduce conflict between parties willing to reciprocate a minimum level of basic respect, and have universalized it into an absolute principle. But all principles are valid only within limits.”— Eli Harman —The “tolerance” ideology is actually just gussied up intolerance rooted in hatred. This is obvious from the fact that “tolerance” is extended only to certain, protected, categories and denied to select others, whom this one-way “tolerance” is merely a weapon against. Whites must tolerate non whites. Men must tolerate women. Straights must tolerate gays. But the reverse is never true. Nobody ever need tolerate straight white males, and we may be punished and excluded with impunity, according to this ideology, which originates in hatred and envy directed specifically at us and aimed at our destruction. And while our enemies virtue signal about “love” (meaning their hate) conquering “intolerance” (meaning normalcy, virtue, tradition, homogeneity, borders, Eugenia, and everything else worthy and good) we know that the only thing which can beat genuine intolerance is even more intolerance…— —“Understanding is hard. Obedience is easy. This is partially reversed if you’re autistic, but probably not fully.”— Ely Harman —“It’s only worthwhile to argue equality from a position of inferiority.”—Ely Harman —If resources (power, territory, capital, subject population) are being mismanaged, then entrepreneurs of violence can profit by taking them over and putting them to more productive or sustainable uses.–Eli Harman —“Appeasement is not a winning strategy.”— Ely Harman —“Paganism is the monarchy and aristocracy of the gods. The intertemporal model we seek to both emulate and avoid the hubris of.”– Eli Harman —“Permissiveness and promiscuity haven’t done anything good for Western societies. We’ve just been able to afford more of them by spending down capital accumulated through past repression.”— Ely Harman —“Postmodernism is the 5th Abrahamic revolt against Western Reason, Empiricism, Aristocracy, and Eugenia – their ongoing struggle to drag humanity back into ignorance, poverty, disease, filth, parasitism and superstition:. The 1st, Judaism; 2nd Christianity; 3rd, Islam; 4th, classical, Marxist, pseudoscientific, Socialism; 5th, Postmodern, cultural Marxist, critical theory and intersectional socialism.” — Eli Harman —“The inescapable, inexorable, distributed dictatorship of free men…”—Ely Harman —“Incremental Suppression is a marginal approach to enforcement, a bologna slice strategy. If you are powerful, you identify the most egregious instances of violation and go after those first, working your way down the list until it’s no longer worth the cost. If you are not powerful, you identify the violators within your reach and begin suppressing them, working your way outward as your power grows and your enemies’ diminish.” —- Ely Harman —“Nobody makes it off this world alive. We differ mainly in how many assholes we take with us. So be a high-scoring hero. Don’t be a low-scoring chump – or worse still, a no scoring zero.”— Eli Harman —“The 2nd Amendment isn’t written with pen and ink on paper, but with fire and fury in the hearts and souls of men and with lead and blood in the dust of the ground.”— Ely Harman      

  • I mean, if you’re going to write science, law, and literature, then do so. But w

    I mean, if you’re going to write science, law, and literature, then do so. But when you conflate them into pseudoscience, philosophy, and theology, you’re just selling snake oil in the language of deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 18:45:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030163641000185857

  • Because (a) intentionally distributed, (b) by giving it away, (c) to homeless pe

    Because (a) intentionally distributed, (b) by giving it away, (c) to homeless people (d) and so police and services are suppressing copycats by limiting message distribution – and they are right to do so. THIS EVENT WILL CAUSE COPYCATS.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-16 16:44:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030133260700008448

    Reply addressees: @arlenerachel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030126341952286725


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030126341952286725

  • HOW MAO OUTED PROGRESSIVES —“Programs pursued during this time include the Hun

    HOW MAO OUTED PROGRESSIVES

    —“Programs pursued during this time include the Hundred Flowers Campaign, in which Mao indicated his supposed willingness to consider different opinions about… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=278063529457211&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-15 19:38:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029814509370859520

  • HOW MAO OUTED PROGRESSIVES —“Programs pursued during this time include the Hun

    HOW MAO OUTED PROGRESSIVES

    —“Programs pursued during this time include the Hundred Flowers Campaign, in which Mao indicated his supposed willingness to consider different opinions about how China should be governed. Given the freedom to express themselves, liberal and intellectual Chinese began opposing the Communist Party and questioning its leadership. This was initially tolerated and encouraged. After a few months, Mao’s government reversed its policy and persecuted those, totaling perhaps 500,000,[citation needed] who criticised, as well as those who were merely alleged to have criticised, the party in what is called the Anti-Rightist Movement. Authors such as Jung Chang have alleged that the Hundred Flowers Campaign was merely a ruse to root out “dangerous” thinking.

    Li Zhisui, Mao’s physician, suggested that Mao had initially seen the policy as a way of weakening opposition to him within the party and that he was surprised by the extent of criticism and the fact that it came to be directed at his own leadership.[190] It was only then that he used it as a method of identifying and subsequently persecuting those critical of his government. The Hundred Flowers movement led to the condemnation, silencing, and death of many citizens, also linked to Mao’s Anti-Rightist Movement, resulting in deaths possibly in the millions”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-15 15:38:00 UTC