by James Santagata (Mixture of truth and humor) 4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not) Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals). Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create havoc. Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems. Phase 4: BooBul: A faux-Hebrewization of English “booboo” ala “I done fucked up debating that guy!!!” + Hebrew “Bul” to create the neology and stay within and satisfy the rhyming / semi-alliterative patterns above. Phases 1-4 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul, Bulbul, and finally Boobul.
Theme: Deception
-
The Four Phases of The Leftist “Debate”
by James Santagata (Mixture of truth and humor) 4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not) Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals). Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create havoc. Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems. Phase 4: BooBul: A faux-Hebrewization of English “booboo” ala “I done fucked up debating that guy!!!” + Hebrew “Bul” to create the neology and stay within and satisfy the rhyming / semi-alliterative patterns above. Phases 1-4 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul, Bulbul, and finally Boobul.
-
Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political cor
Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths.
Conservative shaming relies… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288447341752163&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-30 01:20:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034974112442208256
-
Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political cor
Right political correctness? That’s typical deceit by Pilpul. Left political correctness (postmodern shaming) relies on falsehoods to mask unpleasant truths.
Conservative shaming relies on truths to prevent involuntary transfers. Conservative morality suppresses imposition of costs (meritocracy), left pretense of morality attempts to justify involuntary transfer (theft). What could be obtained by trade (usually conformity for subsidy) is sought at a discount by shaming.
In other words, it’s using Pilpul to cast the equivalency of shaming as an equivalence of actions – and that’s dishonest (actually, fraudulent).
Conservative reciprocity versus classical liberal equality of opportunity, vs leftist equality of outcome, versus radical leftist harm to truth, duty, reciprocity, and markets as a means of rebellion against low social, sexual, economic, and political market value.
It’s just class warfare between middle class (desirable) and underclass (undesirable) genes, with the left playing top and bottom expanding low trust against the high trust but shrinking middle.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 21:20:00 UTC
-
by Steven Jackson Talmudism is a method of exploiting the human error in the let
by Steven Jackson
Talmudism is a method of exploiting the human error in the letter of the law to escape the spirit of the law.
As law is a part of culture, within a homogeneous society… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288375401759357&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 19:41:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034888815758983170
-
by Steven Jackson Talmudism is a method of exploiting the human error in the let
by Steven Jackson
Talmudism is a method of exploiting the human error in the letter of the law to escape the spirit of the law.
As law is a part of culture, within a homogeneous society peers can be relied upon to judge each other with regards to social norms. Hence the success of the Anglo jury of peers system. Laws do not need to be codified under such a system as the jury judges how reasonable the plaintiff’s actions were by comparing them to what their own would be given the circumstances.
Talmudism is the codification of law and a strict adherence to exactly how it is written or how the bureaucracy is performed. This allows individuals to escape justice through loopholes and human error.
This codification is only necessary when society is composed of various cultures.
Within cultures there are different classes. So maybe underclass is the wrong and outgroup is the right word.
Talmudism begins when several cultures interact in a single society and laws have to be codified to accommodate cultural differences. The abuse of the codification arises when pilpul is used to argue the letter of the law against the spirit of the law to escape justice.
Law does not lead to talmudism, disregard for the host culture does
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 15:41:00 UTC
-
by James Santagata 4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll not
by James Santagata
4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left*
(You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not)
Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288181415112089&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 07:20:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034702263233794053
-
by James Santagata 4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left* (You’ll not
by James Santagata
4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left*
(You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not)
Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals).
Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create havoc.
Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems.
Phase 4: BooBul: A faux-Hebrewization of English “booboo” ala “I done fucked up debating that guy!!!” + Hebrew “Bul” to create the neology and stay within and satisfy the rhyming / semi-alliterative patterns above.
Phases 1-4 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul, Bulbul, and finally Boobul.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 03:20:00 UTC
-
Example of J-Critique
Note that (a) I am defending Einstein. (b) he doesn’t understand that I am but is having a feminine reaction to criticism of one of her children, (c) claims expertise but only demonstrates the use of gossip (praise) rather than addressing any of the criticisms of Einstein (that are false). Once you realize their women, and you know how women cognate, then they are very simple. What I am most fascinated by, is the fact that when a pseudo-male uses feminine argument, we respond differently than if a females uses feminine argument. It demonstrates that we in fact do not take women seriously, and we take men who argue in the feminine (pilpul and critique) less seriously despite the fact that their WORDS INFLUENCE WOMEN MORE THAN OURS. WOMEN ARE OUR WEAKNESS.
-
Example of J-Critique
Note that (a) I am defending Einstein. (b) he doesn’t understand that I am but is having a feminine reaction to criticism of one of her children, (c) claims expertise but only demonstrates the use of gossip (praise) rather than addressing any of the criticisms of Einstein (that are false). Once you realize their women, and you know how women cognate, then they are very simple. What I am most fascinated by, is the fact that when a pseudo-male uses feminine argument, we respond differently than if a females uses feminine argument. It demonstrates that we in fact do not take women seriously, and we take men who argue in the feminine (pilpul and critique) less seriously despite the fact that their WORDS INFLUENCE WOMEN MORE THAN OURS. WOMEN ARE OUR WEAKNESS.
