Why is this complicated? Seriously. Disapproval, Shaming, Ridiculing in response to an attempted theft or fraud vs. Disapproval Shaming, Ridiculing in response to covering an attempted theft or fraud. Now, for some reason, it’s floating around, as DSR is a universal vs a particular: in other words, shaming people for a crime rather than for not letting them commit a crime.
Theme: Deception
-
Abrahamism: –“What’s Pilpul?”–
–“What’s Pilpul?”–
Sophism: ‘readings'(tea leaves, entrails, anything), numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, textual interpretation, legal interpretation – the art of making excuses to justify a prior, using loading, framing, suggestion obscurantism, overloading, fictionalism, and deceit. Abrahamism: consists of False Promise, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw manning, and heaping of undue praise, to force you to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. November 7th, 2018 2:17 PM
-
Abrahamism: –“What’s Pilpul?”–
–“What’s Pilpul?”–
Sophism: ‘readings'(tea leaves, entrails, anything), numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, textual interpretation, legal interpretation – the art of making excuses to justify a prior, using loading, framing, suggestion obscurantism, overloading, fictionalism, and deceit. Abrahamism: consists of False Promise, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw manning, and heaping of undue praise, to force you to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. November 7th, 2018 2:17 PM
-
Addicts justify their addictions. Liars justify their lies. Pilpul and Critique
Addicts justify their addictions. Liars justify their lies. Pilpul and Critique are the method, with special pleading, cherry picking, false equivalency, overstatement, and undue praise the tactics. Addicts lie, using pilpul and critique. Truth is truth. Lies are lies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 14:48:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060182280369516547
Reply addressees: @blackseraphim2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060178736513978368
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060178736513978368
-
“What’s Pilpul?”– Sophism: numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, te
–“What’s Pilpul?”–
Sophism: numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, textual interpretation, legal interpretation – the art of making excuses to justify a prior, using loading, framing, suggestion obscurantism, overloading, fictionalism, and deceit.
Abrahamism consists of False Promise, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw manning, and heaping of undue praise, to force you to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 14:17:00 UTC
-
POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying
POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY.
Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with.
So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it.
You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’.
Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it.
So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with)..
Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults.
You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE.
The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes).
The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood).
But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’.
All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice.
Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 09:15:00 UTC
-
WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY? What Demand does Postmodern thought
WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY?
What Demand does Postmodern thought satisfy?
(FYI: Definition: A “Grammar”: rules of continuous, recursive, disambiguation, within a given set of semantic limitations.”)
We produce arguments in their constituent …
– Paradigms,
– Frames, and ..
– Ontologies,
… using …
– Names,
– Relations,
– Values,
– Methods (operations) and their
– cumulative imaginary (forecast) models (worlds)
… to satisfy demand.
We have little control over that demand as far as I know. But whether or not we do, we generate demand.
But what demand do the various degrees of correspondence (and non-correspondence) with our three:
– Physical-Sensory -> or;
– Emotional-Intuitive ->, or;
– Intellectual-Rational
… faculties provide?
And under what …
– Geographic -> ,
– Economic -> ,
– Demographic -> ,
– Political -> ,
– Social
… conditions?
We have demonstrated an ability to speak in various grammars: using the …
– Real-Pseudoscientific-Magical ->
– Historical-Literary-Mythical ->
– Ideal-Pseudorational-Sophistic -> and;
– Supernatural-Theological-Occult,
… meaning, in the …
– Deflated (math, logic, algorithm, protocol, process) ->
– Descriptive, (testimony) ->
– Narrated, (story) ->
– Inflated, ( fiction ) -> and;
– Conflated,
… models of comparison.
Why do we choose the grammars (paradigms of communication)?
Why do …
– Abrahamists (theological) -> ,
– Marxists (pseudoscientific) -> ,
– Postmoderns ( pseudorational) -> ,
– Feminists (mythical)
… choose those grammars.
And why do …
– mathematicians and logicians (ideal) -> ,
– scientists (real and historical) -> ,
– jurists (real and historical) -> ,
– and writers (literary)
…choose their grammars?
The answer is not the first series that will occur to you.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 08:29:00 UTC
-
Postmodernism Is Just Lying. Here Is Why
POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with. So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it. You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’. Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it. So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with).. Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults. You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE. The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes). The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood). But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’. All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice. Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.
-
Postmodernism Is Just Lying. Here Is Why
POSTMODERNISM IS JUST LYING. HERE IS WHY. Well, we differ in tolerance for lying. I have none. You not only tolerate it, but seek to employ it at every opportunity you can get away with. So, I solve for truth. You solve for reasonableness. I use the word ‘true’ meaning decidable independent of preference. You use the word true meaning ‘preferable’ because you conflate the true with the ‘reasonable’ (preferable) – and you can get away with it. You do this because you can’t help yourself. You can’t help yourself for a combination of genetic and cultural reasons. Your ethic is ‘what can I get away with’, the aristocratic (and my) ethic is ‘what is true regardless of the consequences’. Postmodernism holds “what can I get away with normatively and therefore escape stratification and punishment for it, and what can I get away with claiming is ‘true’ and still escape ostracization and punishment for it. So yes, it says get rid of European (‘aryan’) morals, get rid of christian morals (germanized christian), and let loose female, french, and jewish non-morality (whatever I can get away with).. Why? Because Nietzsche was looking for a positive morality when in fact, as the aryans, europeans, romans, and germanics understood, there is no such thing. Morality is a negative (prohibition), and as such we have negative LAW, rather than positive philosophy and positive religion, and positive cults. You can see this in the major works of the civilizations, where the primitive civilizations of the semitic region imposed authoritarian positivism, the indian positive rulership, the chinese collective duty, and the europeans negative law – leaving a LOT of philosophers to propose CHOICES within that law. Rather than ONE SOLUTION CONFLATED with RULE. The Europeans/Romans/Germanics (Aryans) stated there was no positive morality, only a negative morality of reciprocity, leaving the MARKET for positive moralities to adapt to the needs of niches (classes). The only people to grasp this are the english and the americans – and even they failed to maintain indoctrination into it because they did not fully understand it (which is my job – to make it fully understood). But the jews, the french, and white anglo women, have all adopted the female strategy, of ‘what can I get away with’ rather than ‘what can i do without getting away with anything’. All positivas are choice. The only TRUTH AND MORALITY IS NEGATIVE. Everything else is just choice. Like I said. You only have to open your mouth for us to identify whether you are a positivist and parasite, or a negativist and producer.
-
What Demand Does Postmodern Thought Satisfy?
WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY? What Demand does Postmodern thought satisfy? (FYI: Definition: A “Grammar”: rules of continuous, recursive, disambiguation, within a given set of semantic limitations.”) We produce arguments in their constituent …
- Paradigms,
- Frames, and ..
- Ontologies,
… using …
- Names,
- Relations,
- Values,
- Methods (operations) and their
- cumulative imaginary (forecast) models (worlds)
… to satisfy demand. We have little control over that demand as far as I know. But whether or not we do, we generate demand. But what demand do the various degrees of correspondence (and non-correspondence) with our three:
- Physical-Sensory -> or;
- Emotional-Intuitive ->, or;
- Intellectual-Rational
… faculties provide? And under what …
- Geographic -> ,
- Economic -> ,
- Demographic -> ,
- Political -> ,
- Social
… conditions? We have demonstrated an ability to speak in various grammars: using the …
- Real-Pseudoscientific-Magical ->
- Historical-Literary-Mythical ->
- Ideal-Pseudorational-Sophistic -> and;
- Supernatural-Theological-Occult,
… meaning, in the …
- Deflated (math, logic, algorithm, protocol, process) ->
- Descriptive, (testimony) ->
- Narrated, (story) ->
- Inflated, ( fiction ) -> and;
- Conflated,
… models of comparison. Why do we choose the grammars (paradigms of communication)?
Why do …- Abrahamists (theological) -> ,
- Marxists (pseudoscientific) -> ,
- Postmoderns ( pseudorational) -> ,
- Feminists (mythical)
… choose those grammars. And why do …
- mathematicians and logicians (ideal) -> ,
- scientists (real and historical) -> ,
- jurists (real and historical) -> ,
- and writers (literary)
…choose their grammars? The answer is not the first series that will occur to you. Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine