Theme: Deception

  • Bob, Serious question. What bias or biases do you suggest drive Krugman’s propag

    Bob, Serious question. What bias or biases do you suggest drive Krugman’s propagandism? I spent a few months looking into it in 09, but I think you have a deeper understanding…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 00:38:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063954479601643521

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063842693804158977


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BobMurphyEcon

    “After further review, the ruling on the field stands. Krugman’s post makes no sense whatsoever.” https://t.co/NQv9DAJlTP

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063842693804158977

  • RT @HbdNrx: Being aware of framing and maintaining your frame is critical. “Deep

    RT @HbdNrx: Being aware of framing and maintaining your frame is critical.

    “Deep-seated racism and bigotry in this country allowed Trump t…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 00:35:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063953707690311681

  • Every book Nassim has written brings him closer to the conclusion: that warranty

    Every book Nassim has written brings him closer to the conclusion: that warranty of due diligence, and insurance of restitution (SITG) are the only defenses against Sophism, Pseudoscience, and Innumeracy. The Law not math or science, is our only defense against information fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-17 01:28:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063604859449106432

    Reply addressees: @NateSilver538 @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062782704159256576


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NateSilver538

    Remember when you had skin in the game and interesting things to say (instead of having re-written the book you wrote in 2001 like 4 times) and weren’t consumed by your anger @nntaleb? … Sorry bro but you’ve kind of become an intellectual-yet-idiot. https://t.co/Y48LTwdDHg

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062782704159256576

  • SIGNALING. That’s why. We need to form a ‘Mean Guys’ movement to counter the “Ga

    SIGNALING. That’s why. We need to form a ‘Mean Guys’ movement to counter the “Gated Institutional Narrative Sophists” and the “Intellectual Dark Web Apologists”.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-17 01:25:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063603949532532736

    Reply addressees: @nntaleb @NateSilver538

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063202199847620608


    IN REPLY TO:

    @nntaleb

    Why is Nate Silver @NateSilver538 misrepresenting my book? in bad faith?

    https://t.co/W2mzK9MLhu

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063202199847620608

  • by Greg Hamilton Most languages of peoples that live in an “enemy” situation whe

    by Greg Hamilton

    Most languages of peoples that live in an “enemy” situation where the enemy speaks the same language develop coded language as a defense.

    We may be seeing this happening at an unconscious level.

    Native speakers at a low brain level realize they are behind enemy lines so to speak.

    I know from experience movie quotes and childhood TV provide coded speech a non native could never train to understand.

    As an aside movie quotes are very powerful as they carry a whole story along with them.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 15:04:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46477073_10156782508967264_881141465

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46477073_10156782508967264_8811414652316549120_n_10156782508962264.jpg THE PROGRESSION OF LEFTIST ARGUMENTCurt Doolittle(From a friend that wants to remain anonymous)Nov 16, 2018, 1:55 PMSkye StewartOf course this is exactly what lefties say about their opponents. What’s the cleanest data we have that exhibits demographic density of these tendencies?Nov 16, 2018, 2:03 PMCurt DoolittleRight uses eugenic moralizing, left uses dysgenic denialism.

    hard to argue that the right abuses the courts and the state as do the left.Nov 16, 2018, 2:04 PMBryan Nova BreyWell I’ll be damned…

    It’s a meme on Curt Doolittle’s timeline! 😜Nov 16, 2018, 2:12 PMCurt Doolittletechnically speaking it’s an illustrated series (an argument in series). So yeah. It makes the grade.Nov 16, 2018, 2:14 PMBryan Nova BreyMy son has been asked to provide some memes to his teacher and explain the pop-culture references, and likely the value of memes for learning and transmitting information.Nov 16, 2018, 2:19 PMMichael D. AbbottMemes are extremely tacky–and yet, on the other hand, they are similar to cave paintings and other ancient forms of simple communication.Nov 16, 2018, 2:22 PMCharles LamptonKeeping several horses is making sense.Nov 16, 2018, 3:37 PMAndrew ClaytonUniverse Brain: Throwing faeces at you opponentNov 16, 2018, 3:59 PMFawzi M. ChalaNov 17, 2018, 5:51 PMTHE PROGRESSION OF LEFTIST ARGUMENT


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 13:54:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46348337_10156782411017264_315130598

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46348337_10156782411017264_31513059814014976_o_10156782411012264.jpg EXAMPLE OF TWITTER CRITICISMJC Trott“IM GOING TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS TO SHOW YOU HOW RIGHT I AM!!!”Nov 16, 2018, 1:06 PMDmitry NikolovLove your savage responseNov 16, 2018, 1:16 PMJonathan WilburReport himNov 16, 2018, 1:39 PMJonathan WilburThat’s rapeNov 16, 2018, 1:39 PMDan Warrenmmmmm windows….tasty.Nov 16, 2018, 1:42 PMOkon Miracle PatrickYou’re actually on the right path man.Nov 16, 2018, 2:04 PMMatthew PenningtonSo that’s why they always say louder for the people in the back🤔Nov 16, 2018, 2:51 PMSean RingAnother gender studies major with $250,000 in student debt and zero income, surely. Totally off Twitter now. Or at least until they rename it “Twatter.”Nov 16, 2018, 10:35 PMBlake Peter DowsonAdding window licker to my lexiconNov 17, 2018, 2:33 AMMicah PezdirtzAdd it to your playlist- Aphex TwinNov 17, 2018, 6:09 AMEXAMPLE OF TWITTER CRITICISM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 13:02:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46381393_10156781829982264_648151075

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46381393_10156781829982264_648151075097935872_n_10156781829977264.jpg James SantagataHere’s the deal. Most people have been trained and indoctrinated to believe, actually to “know” that assassinations, death squads, revolutions and civil wars are what happen in less developed or developing countries, not ours…. and that the time for that has long passed, that it would be actually immature. So, once it does kick off, that feeling of power and freedom (think a big drop on a roller coaster) kicks in….. elation…. and an epiphany, that violence not only works, it is the only thing that works, and is timeless. And then people are like – wow, lets break a few things, and fuck some people up.Nov 16, 2018, 8:04 AMTed MidwardShutdown liquor distribution and cancel knyggerball indefinitely. This is the only way to awaken the White Goyim.Nov 16, 2018, 8:33 AMTed MidwardYeah, violence is pretty persuasive where reason and diplomacy fail. This is me speaking as an amateur historian, not endorsing political violence for the record.Nov 16, 2018, 11:40 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 07:45:00 UTC

  • LESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description

    LESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling

    VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description –> COUNTER-SIGNALING

    (about what I say)…………………………….(about what you say)

    COUNTER SIGNALING as a cover for COWARDICE is the opposite of VIRTUE SIGNALING as a cover for COST AVOIDANCE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 10:25:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM I think you’re looking at the differences between lea

    THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM

    I think you’re looking at the differences between leaves rather than the forest. In the end, the criticism is marxism is pseudoscience, postmodernism is sophism, and feminism simply false, and that these three movements, by making false statements and impossible promises are leading people into sadness and our civilization in decline.

    I study the abrahamic > marxist > Postmodern technique of argument (false promises, pilpul (justificationary sophism) and critique (reputation destruction) as the institutionalization of the female anti social personality expression as a persuasive technique. All these are guments use the same technique. They are all false. And they all cause the damage Peterson Claims.

    So the none of the details matter – they are but different decorations on the underlying lie.

    The term Neo Marxism refers to the transition of the means of UNDERMINING (reputation destruction) from the Marxist economic to the postmodern cultural complaint. Egro, yes Abrahamists > Marxists > Postmodernists > Feminist.

    Same technique, same goal, while changing only the critique.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:53:00 UTC