Theme: Deception

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550938699 Timestamp) REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED. (core) Someone just suggested I reiterate. I don’t do hate on people, but on ideas. (Although I do a lot of anger and frustration, because I don’t suffer fools, sophists, supernaturalists, or the intellectually dishonest.)

    1. Propertarianism is a social science written in the grammars of law and economics. The product of that work is universal like all sciences. Any people can use it. It is easier for our people to use it because we have higher trust, lower corruption, and more experience under empirical truth and rule of law, because we have been a middle class or middle class organized polity for longer than all other peoples.
    2. I view the Ashkenazim as ‘ours’ – genetically they are half ours, and we’ve “bought and paid for their inclusion” in our polity so to speak over the centuries – at the costs of tens of millions of lives, vast abuse by extreme usury, undermining of every one of our nations, and cultures, and much of our great civil wars.

    3. But I view their problem as ours – our failure to adapt the law to prohibit parasitism upon the commons, false promise and baiting in to moral hazard, and the use of pilpul and critique, including the defense of all of the above by GSRRM.

    4. I view the problem of this kind behavior as relatively easily solved by law – law which I have produced, by accident really, as a byproduct of attempting to explain our own group strategy in scientific terms.

    5. I view the ending of the malincentives of the industries in which they employ false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul, critique, and GSRRM resulting in continuous undermining of our civlization as relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    6. I view restoring our high trust society, the civil society, the family, and the market between men and women, definancializing our society, depoliticizing it, de-programming it, cleaning the academy, the media, the government, and business, finance, economics, and law, of this behavior relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    I DON’T AVOID THE QUESTION – I SHOW YOU THE MIRROR So, I don’t avoid the JQ. I explain it. I answer it. I say how to productively solve it. And I do it without hating on anything except our traditional differences in group competition that like all differences must be ameliorated by incremental suppression of novel means of parasitism, by the incremental evolution of the common law of tort. IS THIS A CIVNAT POSITION? Well, I write LAW. Whatever government you want to produce, whether nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist, and no matter what economic model you may want to produce, you can do it with P-LAW as long as you do it truthfully and transparently, without fictionalisms, lying, and GSRRM. So it’s an ethno nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist position. WHAT ABOUT ETHNOCENTRISM? My position is scientific: (a) ethnocentrism is always and everywhere the optimum group strategy, (b) it is the optimum international order always and everywhere (c) scale is only valuable for (i) suicide by debt expansion, (ii) use of suicide by debt expansion in the production of industrial (Gen 2 and Gen 3) warfare, in an age where hand to hand, and rifle, and mechanized infantry, have been replaced by supersonic autonomous nuclear weaponry – all but eliminating the utility of population and scale from the equation. WHAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION? If you want my opinion (i) we are (at least our productive classes) incompatible with peoples who have practiced less self domestication (lower class size reduction, and neotonic evolution) without tragic cost to our future, to ourselves, and to our ancestors (ii) I ‘demand’ ethnocentric polity and (ii) no people or group of people have the right to deny it without conducting genocide, for which genocide is the only possible reciprocity. (iiii) I am willing to demand restitution for past and present lifetime crimes by those that attempt to make that decision for me and mine. PRODUCE INCENTIVES BY LAW – THE REST WILL FOLLOW. There are no other people other than east asians that are sufficiently compatible with us because they are the only other people more self-domesticated than we are. And there is no need for population, particularly underclass population, in an era where labor is no longer competitive in the international market therefore producing a deadweight cost burden on us for eternity. YOU DON”T NEED TO “BELIEVE” THE LAW People don’t have to believe in or agree with the Law. They just need to avoid it. They don’t need to be trained. Or educated. Incentives ripple through the economy and polity almost instantaneously. All that is required is incentive to report violations, and any violation of reciprocity that exposes anyone to risk provides incentive.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550936676 Timestamp) —“I want to ask a question … if you’d be so kind. Do you make the contention that Christianity(Jesus) was a trick by the jews in order to shackle the goyim?”—Hugh McVey I make the contention that saul was trying to produce an heroic literature for the jews(christians) of his own sect, that could compete with Homer’s Iliad (the trials of achilles), which was the dominant ‘religious text’ of the greek world. I think that when the many ‘priests’ of the greek world were looking for a means of resisting greek (then roman) rule and thought, they found they could rally people with that text, and they all produced some version of it. I think once it became possible to use this movement as did marxists and postmodernists use the movement in the modern world – to obtain power – they did. I think that they did what they are doing today which is then destroying the academy, the arts, the letters, with this nonsense supernatural propaganda in the ancient world as with pseudoscience in the present. I mean, they TORTURED and MURDERED the greek philosophers in athens until all left. By 512 they’d outlawed teaching of philosophy, imprisoned, tortured, murdered, or banished every philosopher in athens. We are just in ‘christianity version two’ right now. and you’re trying to apologize for the first version – and the thousand year dark age we still have not shaken off our people. I think you’re ignorant and it’s not your fault. But once you are aware that you’re not only wrong, but harmful, it’s your responsibility to stop.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550934023 Timestamp) NO MORE FAILURE REQUIRES NO MORE LIES It’s a truthful argument. The only valid criticism of modern christianity is the statement that it is truth and history rather than wisdom and parable, and the lie is preserved by the abrahamic means of lying – that I illustrate daily. Christians have no choice. They’re headed to 25% evangelical in 75% atheist polity, where the polity will be conquered by jews and muslims like all in the past if we don’t stop it. If christians and conservatives and libertarians hadn’t failed for over a century then we wouldn’t be in our current position. No more failure requires NO MORE LIES.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550933257 Timestamp) DEFINITIONS: SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG VERSIONS WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Short) Propertarianism is a system of law designed to prevent lying in politics. … … WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Medium) Propertarianism is a methodology that completes the scientific method; the application of that method to the law; a set of amendments to restore rule of law; including the prevention of lying about commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics in public speech. … … WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Long) Propertarianism refers to a body of work. That body of work consists of: … 1. HISTORY: An explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient and modern worlds. … 2. METHOD: The completion of the scientific method and and its embodiment in law. … 3. APPLICATION: Application of that method to all fields and common moral and legal questions. … 4. LAW: A formal, algorithmic, operational, logic of law. … 5. CONSTITUTION: A set of Recommended Amendments to the Constitution for the United States – preserving the current legal entity, while altering the current means of government. … 6. POLICIES: a set of policies to reform our military, political, economic, financial, and social orders. … 7. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation that insurrection be used to demand implementation of these amendments to the constitution, given the scale of the parasitic classes in and out of government.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550931482 Timestamp) —I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a year, but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct. The ruth is the most devastating weapon. We must only pay the high cost of using it.—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550970542 Timestamp) If I was gonna have a cult, I’d do one that appealed to leftists, promised free stuff, indiscipline, free virtue signals, and threw parties – they get the easy chicks. (Oh…. wait. That’s Burning Man with political ambitions)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550938699 Timestamp) REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED. (core) Someone just suggested I reiterate. I don’t do hate on people, but on ideas. (Although I do a lot of anger and frustration, because I don’t suffer fools, sophists, supernaturalists, or the intellectually dishonest.)

    1. Propertarianism is a social science written in the grammars of law and economics. The product of that work is universal like all sciences. Any people can use it. It is easier for our people to use it because we have higher trust, lower corruption, and more experience under empirical truth and rule of law, because we have been a middle class or middle class organized polity for longer than all other peoples.
    2. I view the Ashkenazim as ‘ours’ – genetically they are half ours, and we’ve “bought and paid for their inclusion” in our polity so to speak over the centuries – at the costs of tens of millions of lives, vast abuse by extreme usury, undermining of every one of our nations, and cultures, and much of our great civil wars.

    3. But I view their problem as ours – our failure to adapt the law to prohibit parasitism upon the commons, false promise and baiting in to moral hazard, and the use of pilpul and critique, including the defense of all of the above by GSRRM.

    4. I view the problem of this kind behavior as relatively easily solved by law – law which I have produced, by accident really, as a byproduct of attempting to explain our own group strategy in scientific terms.

    5. I view the ending of the malincentives of the industries in which they employ false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul, critique, and GSRRM resulting in continuous undermining of our civlization as relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    6. I view restoring our high trust society, the civil society, the family, and the market between men and women, definancializing our society, depoliticizing it, de-programming it, cleaning the academy, the media, the government, and business, finance, economics, and law, of this behavior relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    I DON’T AVOID THE QUESTION – I SHOW YOU THE MIRROR So, I don’t avoid the JQ. I explain it. I answer it. I say how to productively solve it. And I do it without hating on anything except our traditional differences in group competition that like all differences must be ameliorated by incremental suppression of novel means of parasitism, by the incremental evolution of the common law of tort. IS THIS A CIVNAT POSITION? Well, I write LAW. Whatever government you want to produce, whether nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist, and no matter what economic model you may want to produce, you can do it with P-LAW as long as you do it truthfully and transparently, without fictionalisms, lying, and GSRRM. So it’s an ethno nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist position. WHAT ABOUT ETHNOCENTRISM? My position is scientific: (a) ethnocentrism is always and everywhere the optimum group strategy, (b) it is the optimum international order always and everywhere (c) scale is only valuable for (i) suicide by debt expansion, (ii) use of suicide by debt expansion in the production of industrial (Gen 2 and Gen 3) warfare, in an age where hand to hand, and rifle, and mechanized infantry, have been replaced by supersonic autonomous nuclear weaponry – all but eliminating the utility of population and scale from the equation. WHAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION? If you want my opinion (i) we are (at least our productive classes) incompatible with peoples who have practiced less self domestication (lower class size reduction, and neotonic evolution) without tragic cost to our future, to ourselves, and to our ancestors (ii) I ‘demand’ ethnocentric polity and (ii) no people or group of people have the right to deny it without conducting genocide, for which genocide is the only possible reciprocity. (iiii) I am willing to demand restitution for past and present lifetime crimes by those that attempt to make that decision for me and mine. PRODUCE INCENTIVES BY LAW – THE REST WILL FOLLOW. There are no other people other than east asians that are sufficiently compatible with us because they are the only other people more self-domesticated than we are. And there is no need for population, particularly underclass population, in an era where labor is no longer competitive in the international market therefore producing a deadweight cost burden on us for eternity. YOU DON”T NEED TO “BELIEVE” THE LAW People don’t have to believe in or agree with the Law. They just need to avoid it. They don’t need to be trained. Or educated. Incentives ripple through the economy and polity almost instantaneously. All that is required is incentive to report violations, and any violation of reciprocity that exposes anyone to risk provides incentive.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550980666 Timestamp) Sorry. I slay sacred cows. My own especially. The truth has no mercy. So if you have sacred cows (falsehoods), I will eventually offend you.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550980666 Timestamp) Sorry. I slay sacred cows. My own especially. The truth has no mercy. So if you have sacred cows (falsehoods), I will eventually offend you.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551102851 Timestamp) Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else does. —“Why though?”–Spencer Randolph It’s a non-argument, usually used against me, when in fact, I am a member of the Jones generation (between boomers and Gen X) like Gates, Ellison, and Jobs, and I don’t share ANY values with the boomers. I want to end them. And make them pay. Jones generation is star wars/indiana jones/blade runner/alien Neuromancer/Snow Crash, first home computers, first video game consoles, and the founders of the tech boom. —“Fair enough. How would you describe the epidemic of political ineptitude displayed in large part by the particular aforementioned and verboten generation?”—Spencer Randolph I don’t disagree with criticisms of boomers. I disagree that I”m a boomer. Demographers classify generations by population cycles. Social Scientists classify generations by shared experience and values. I hated those ‘boomer’ fkers and I still do.