Theme: Deception

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1548890813 Timestamp) ((FOLLOW PATTERN PRINCIPLE (he disappeared for a while. he is back. he’s very good thinker)) UNDERSTANDING HIGHER ORDER SUBVERSION AND LYING By @[100006830866673:2048:Pattern Principle] We’re accustomed with being lied to and so the deceiving subverters will often put many lies on the table of options. Sometimes those lies are very palpable and familiar, because those options are very tangible, in the sense we can select them and they would have very tangible consequences and realistic outcomes. An example? Take Communism. We can see this option on the table, and while it is full of lying, we know that if we were to select it, we understand its outcome – for better or for worse. Yet there is a worse kind of lie still. A lie which presents itself as not only appealing because it appears to be in full alignment with your ideology, yet it is physically & tangibly unobtainable. Here’s the crucial danger: it will parade itself to be the answer of the most reasonable category and persuasion without empirical demonstration. An example? “No lords or kings for me.” In reality – we don’t get that option. You either have dark lords who rule from the shadows of the modern, Democratic post WWII state and central banking (with no accountability), or you have lords whose names you know and whose self interest is in total alignment with the well being of his subjects without parasitism. This lie is critically dangerous because it can only continue to thrive as long as we believe in a mythology of supporting lies which makes it seem palpable, especially in the United States. To be clear – you have never NOT had a lord – even though you may have not known his name. Yes Americans, that includes you. The worst lies are the lies which appeal but can not be realized without us knowing it. “The utility of a lie is determined by the desirability of its repetition. Lies are information products like any other market product. ” – Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (FB 1548890813 Timestamp) ((FOLLOW PATTERN PRINCIPLE (he disappeared for a while. he is back. he’s very good thinker)) UNDERSTANDING HIGHER ORDER SUBVERSION AND LYING By @[100006830866673:2048:Pattern Principle] We’re accustomed with being lied to and so the deceiving subverters will often put many lies on the table of options. Sometimes those lies are very palpable and familiar, because those options are very tangible, in the sense we can select them and they would have very tangible consequences and realistic outcomes. An example? Take Communism. We can see this option on the table, and while it is full of lying, we know that if we were to select it, we understand its outcome – for better or for worse. Yet there is a worse kind of lie still. A lie which presents itself as not only appealing because it appears to be in full alignment with your ideology, yet it is physically & tangibly unobtainable. Here’s the crucial danger: it will parade itself to be the answer of the most reasonable category and persuasion without empirical demonstration. An example? “No lords or kings for me.” In reality – we don’t get that option. You either have dark lords who rule from the shadows of the modern, Democratic post WWII state and central banking (with no accountability), or you have lords whose names you know and whose self interest is in total alignment with the well being of his subjects without parasitism. This lie is critically dangerous because it can only continue to thrive as long as we believe in a mythology of supporting lies which makes it seem palpable, especially in the United States. To be clear – you have never NOT had a lord – even though you may have not known his name. Yes Americans, that includes you. The worst lies are the lies which appeal but can not be realized without us knowing it. “The utility of a lie is determined by the desirability of its repetition. Lies are information products like any other market product. ” – Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548885864 Timestamp) —“I’d argue that the energy efficency increase brought more mass media, and that exponential increment on the propagation of lies is what made it easier to dumb down or deceive the populations. That should be counted as a factor, at least.”—Alejandro Luque

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548885864 Timestamp) —“I’d argue that the energy efficency increase brought more mass media, and that exponential increment on the propagation of lies is what made it easier to dumb down or deceive the populations. That should be counted as a factor, at least.”—Alejandro Luque

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548873295 Timestamp) NO. YOU HAVE FAITH IN A FRAUD. NOT REASON. —“….libertarians believe….”— Libertarian Party 0) Everything you subsidize will increase in consumption thereby increasing the overall proportion of productivity used to consume it. The only question is whether like engines of the animal, mechanical or digital categories, they produce higher returns for doing so – or not. 1) Libertarianism persists fallen angel version of man vs the risen beast, slowly domesticated by the violent imposition of demand for reciprocity under that law we call tort. Findings of Law, Legislation, and Regulation do in fact limit scams and frauds. … and …. 2) … so the problem is not law, and regulation, but the inability of the consumer to judge the product delivered to him, and the use of redistribution to compensate those who engage in fraud that takes advantage of that ignorance. 3) This is an example of a common (infantlie) libertarian trope:that the consumer can possess sufficient information to avoid irreciprocity, and that the insurer of last resort should not force due diligence in the service of the market by those who might abuse asymmetry of info. 4) Jewish law, which is the source of left libertarianism, only enforces the demand for volition,and not warranty. European law, which is the source of liberalism, enforces reciprocity and warranty. There is a reason for the historical incompatibility, of the two ethical systems. 5) We are faced today with not only the difference between Anglo classical liberal and reciprocal, germanic reciprocal proportional, french authoritarian socialist proportional, jewish voluntary unwarrantied, but now Islamic Authoritarian irreciprocal law of conquest. 6) Libertarians are wrong. Whether they are wrong because they are infantile, or wrong because they have parasitic preferences is immaterial. There is only one source of liberty: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, the law of tort and jury, violence and defense. 7) Sovereignty exists in fact. Liberty by the permission of the sovereign. Freedom by the utility of the sovereign. And sovereignty has but one source, and that is the organized application of violence to deny all other alternatives. 8) Welcome to the revolution. Those who fight will have sovereignty not liberty or freedom. Those who do not fight will have none.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548873295 Timestamp) NO. YOU HAVE FAITH IN A FRAUD. NOT REASON. —“….libertarians believe….”— Libertarian Party 0) Everything you subsidize will increase in consumption thereby increasing the overall proportion of productivity used to consume it. The only question is whether like engines of the animal, mechanical or digital categories, they produce higher returns for doing so – or not. 1) Libertarianism persists fallen angel version of man vs the risen beast, slowly domesticated by the violent imposition of demand for reciprocity under that law we call tort. Findings of Law, Legislation, and Regulation do in fact limit scams and frauds. … and …. 2) … so the problem is not law, and regulation, but the inability of the consumer to judge the product delivered to him, and the use of redistribution to compensate those who engage in fraud that takes advantage of that ignorance. 3) This is an example of a common (infantlie) libertarian trope:that the consumer can possess sufficient information to avoid irreciprocity, and that the insurer of last resort should not force due diligence in the service of the market by those who might abuse asymmetry of info. 4) Jewish law, which is the source of left libertarianism, only enforces the demand for volition,and not warranty. European law, which is the source of liberalism, enforces reciprocity and warranty. There is a reason for the historical incompatibility, of the two ethical systems. 5) We are faced today with not only the difference between Anglo classical liberal and reciprocal, germanic reciprocal proportional, french authoritarian socialist proportional, jewish voluntary unwarrantied, but now Islamic Authoritarian irreciprocal law of conquest. 6) Libertarians are wrong. Whether they are wrong because they are infantile, or wrong because they have parasitic preferences is immaterial. There is only one source of liberty: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, the law of tort and jury, violence and defense. 7) Sovereignty exists in fact. Liberty by the permission of the sovereign. Freedom by the utility of the sovereign. And sovereignty has but one source, and that is the organized application of violence to deny all other alternatives. 8) Welcome to the revolution. Those who fight will have sovereignty not liberty or freedom. Those who do not fight will have none.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548891462 Timestamp) —“Once we remove the involuntary/parasitic subsidy of r from the environment (something “No more lies” accomplishes), K will out-compete and out-reproduce r. The only subsidy then available to r will be charity or trade (for example – in return for not reproducing)”—Luke Weinhagen (follow Luke)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549033010 Timestamp) GENERATIONS AND THE ERAS OF FRAUD E-Prime = Testimony of My Knowledge (Science=Testimony) Medieval Thought = Supernatural knowledge Greco/Roman Thought = Supernormal Knowledge Germanic Languages = Testimonial (descriptive). (Germanic=Scandinavian, Germanic, Celtic, Italic) (Italic(present) = Romance (latin) languages.) Aristotle RESTORED naturalist thought. Bacon et all RESTORED naturalist thought. The Operationalists RESTORED naturalist thought.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548991173 Timestamp) Bill Joslin IMO korzybski devised a way to enact an essentially relativistic and nihilists position. The brilliance of this tool, again IMO , was grounding e-prime into a standard criteria i.e. operationalism. By doing so it closes the door to the relativistic, nihilistic uses. Further to that, e-prime strongly couples our speech and thought to the operational criteria. But if left at this alone, I think it would suffer the same flaws as logical positivism… By expanding the criteria into multiple dimensions, we don’t reduce our warrant (speech and thought) to overly restrictive limitations (i.e. cherry picking, erroneous or undue dismissiveness.) The last component , acknowledging truth as an approximation (as per Curt’s view) prevents us from undue certainty and dogmatically held assertions of “truth”. So – E-prime eliminates unfounded assertions – Operationalism eliminates relativistic nihilistic application – Expanded operationalism (testimonial criteria) eliminates myopic limitations (undue dismissiveness) – And provisional truth theories eliminate dogmatic assertions of certainty. – The first contributor did the light lifting – nothing really – The second (Bridgeman) cross the major threshold – Curt and his community (assuming other contributed – Curzon etc) the the heavy lifting

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549033010 Timestamp) GENERATIONS AND THE ERAS OF FRAUD E-Prime = Testimony of My Knowledge (Science=Testimony) Medieval Thought = Supernatural knowledge Greco/Roman Thought = Supernormal Knowledge Germanic Languages = Testimonial (descriptive). (Germanic=Scandinavian, Germanic, Celtic, Italic) (Italic(present) = Romance (latin) languages.) Aristotle RESTORED naturalist thought. Bacon et all RESTORED naturalist thought. The Operationalists RESTORED naturalist thought.