Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • P=Markets in everything, but unlike jewish libertinism (Rothbard), or continenta

    P=Markets in everything, but unlike jewish libertinism (Rothbard), or continental libertarianism (Hoppe), *all* imposition of costs is prohibited, *and* all deceit, because the law is monological, and absolute, even in commons, rather than arbitrary (Hoppe, Rothbard).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-27 13:38:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155110265744220160

    Reply addressees: @hasan93r

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155108991560769536

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hasan93r So, just as the west was corrupted by Alexander’s crossing of the Bosphorus, and the introduction to the west of authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit, P is a formal law that prohibits authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155108991560769536

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hasan93r So, just as the west was corrupted by Alexander’s crossing of the Bosphorus, and the introduction to the west of authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit, P is a formal law that prohibits authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155108991560769536

  • So, just as the west was corrupted by Alexander’s crossing of the Bosphorus, and

    So, just as the west was corrupted by Alexander’s crossing of the Bosphorus, and the introduction to the west of authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit, P is a formal law that prohibits authoritarianism, supernaturalism, and semitic deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-27 13:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155108991560769536

    Reply addressees: @hasan93r

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155108194924093441

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hasan93r In proper western tradition, the monarchy if one exists, serves only as a judge of last resort (via-negativa), to veto actions of the government (market for commons) that are ill preferences of fashion, failures of argument and discourse, acts against the people or future.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155108194924093441

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @hasan93r In proper western tradition, the monarchy if one exists, serves only as a judge of last resort (via-negativa), to veto actions of the government (market for commons) that are ill preferences of fashion, failures of argument and discourse, acts against the people or future.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155108194924093441

  • MISUNDERSTANDING ONE ANOTHER Yes, I stomp on people who are out of line. And yes

    MISUNDERSTANDING ONE ANOTHER

    Yes, I stomp on people who are out of line. And yes I get it wrong. I get it wrong particularly when you are trying to be cunning or witty or use some pop cultural reference – ’cause I don’t do pop culture.

    Sure, you want me to step into your frame of mind, and understand what you intend. And by reciprocity I want you to step into mine.

    I curate the hell out of my feed to maintain the quality. How many morons do I have to deal with every single day, day in, and day out, who say stupid sh*t?

    I can’t keep track of everyone – there are ten thousand here, and an equal number of lurkers.

    SO when I fuck up because I don’t understand some reference, just point it out, and I’ll apologise.

    But if I can understand whether you’re being supportive, or a moron, then how can anyone else?

    So no harm no foul, sorry for misinterpreting you, and sorry for the hard pushback.

    Just treat me the same way – be careful what you say in public that can be misinterpreted – thereby forcing me to spend time in aggressive curation of the feed that I”d rather spend NOT doing that.

    😉 -hugs brother.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:11:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508154683420030

  • BY JOHN MARK – OBJECTIVE MORALITY – NO MORE LIES 1/ Recognizing differences betw

    BY JOHN MARK – OBJECTIVE MORALITY – NO MORE LIES

    1/ Recognizing differences between groups *does* lead to discrimination. Groups with different average characteristics *will* be treated differently, because *it makes sense* to do that.

    E.g. all non-blacks know not to spend time in or travel thru black neighborhoods.

    2/ When the Left claims “We must treat all groups equally” they are actually saying,

    “You are required to allow groups with worse avg characteristics (e.g. lower avg IQ, higher crime rate, anti-white attitudes) to impose costs on you.”

    Which will *always* produce backlash.

    3/ This is why RECIPROCITY (non-parasitism)(natural law)(no one is allowed to impose costs on any non-parasitically earned form of property) is objective morality.

    It is the only “rule” that stops retaliation cycles from happening.

    4/ The Left’s “equality” narrative is a LIE designed to make you FEEL OBLIGATED to allow costs of various kinds to be imposed on you.

    This constant stream of attempts at violations of reciprocity produce backlash/conflict. The Left then frames backlash as “hate” (another lie).

    5/ The Right’s instinct, in a nutshell, is to enforce reciprocity (no theft or destruction of property including civilizational assets).

    The Left (and parasitic elites) CANNOT abide this because it stops them from getting what they want.

    6/ This is why Propertarianism is so powerful.

    It gives us a simple narrative and rule – RECIPROCITY – to counter the Left’s attempts at parasitism through their false equality narrative, not just in conversation/debate (somewhat useful) but in LAW (infinitely useful).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:07:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508139456836638

  • Um…. you wanna explain to me how it is, where these freemasons are, and how ma

    Um…. you wanna explain to me how it is, where these freemasons are, and how many there are, and what they’re doing?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:03:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154754211005030401

    Reply addressees: @JSp46305240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154742056507625473

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154742056507625473

  • THE ONLY HARD PROBLEM It’s the only substantial problem. How do I prevent abraha

    THE ONLY HARD PROBLEM
    It’s the only substantial problem. How do I prevent abrahamic lying and suicidal pathological altruism when christianity is composed of abrahamic lying and pathological altruism? I mean, exhaustive forgiveness is at least rational. Pathological unregulated, limitless altruism is just suicidal. I want to eradicate all lying in the commons and I can’t do it because of our people’s dependence upon this religion. It’s like many things. The limits (kin) aren’t stated. And the virtue signaling rather than interpersonal acts of charity that lift the recipient into self sufficiency are disastrous. And allowing women to vote us into funding grifters is magnitudes worse.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:56:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508095056928767

  • AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER? —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo

    AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER?

    —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo chamber.”—Alan Levinovitz

    What you mean is, you want to be able to coerce people with disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, reputation destruction, sophism, and pseudoscience rather than exchange value with them in the markets private or common(government).

    I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.

    So what do you have to trade instead of engaging in the straw man critique of “echo chamber” as an act of sophistry to distract from having nothing to exchange, or trying to ‘cheat’ them, when the only moral constraints that exist are those between cooperators not their enemies?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508068996006457

  • ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY. —“I’m not su

    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY.

    —“I’m not sure how pointing out that religions institutionalize echo chambers, in a conversation about echo chambers, means anything like whatever you just said. I’m concerned with ideological homogeneity in all forms. That’s why I criticize it”—

    Good point. So what about ideological competition vs simple truth and reciprocity in everything? In other words what is the purpose of ideology other than power under democracy, philosophy other than power under aristocracy, religion in opposition to aristocracy? Why any of them?

    As far as I know sophism, pseudoscience, fraud, ideology, philosophy, theology, are just means of avoiding engaging in private (economy) and public markets (politics), in order to obtain something by stealing it rather than trading for it. This problem is undermining democracy.

    So, we all create echo chambers and most of the literature, especially in behavioral economics, focuses on various forms of selection bias. The thing is that it’s NECESSARY because groups have different degrees of agency, and the commons is saturated with undecidable falsehoods.

    Those of us with the necessary talents are as ignorant of the demands of the common people given our market for falsehoods, as they are limited by dunning kruger in falsifying them. ie: networks of common paradigms are necessary. Our only universal is law of tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508065836578181

  • This data does not match the church data, or the church financial data. It’s the

    This data does not match the church data, or the church financial data. It’s the same reason Danes always poll as happier when they aren’t. It’s expected. It’s why polls that can be affected by virtue signals are off so far (political).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 01:11:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154559941748781058

    Reply addressees: @mariachong @TakillaMocking @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154495423278542848

    IN REPLY TO:

    @mariachong

    @TakillaMocking @EPoe187 America is very religious. Even non-church goers in America are religious: https://t.co/xe2YsRGqgx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154495423278542848

  • Those of us with the necessary talents are as ignorant of the demands of the com

    Those of us with the necessary talents are as ignorant of the demands of the common people given our market for falsehoods, as they are limited by dunning kruger in falsifying them. ie: networks of common paradigms are necessary. Our only universal is law of tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 00:25:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154548272951910400

    Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154547894155743232

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 So, we all create echo chambers and most of the literature, especially in behavioral economics, focuses on various forms of selection bias. The thing is that it’s NECESSARY because groups have different degrees of agency, and the commons is saturated with undecidable falsehoods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154547894155743232

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @AlanLevinovitz @EPoe187 So, we all create echo chambers and most of the literature, especially in behavioral economics, focuses on various forms of selection bias. The thing is that it’s NECESSARY because groups have different degrees of agency, and the commons is saturated with undecidable falsehoods.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1154547894155743232