Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • ( … ) The answer is ancient. As we can see in Aesop’s Fables: Fable 112 – The

    ( … )

    The answer is ancient. As we can see in Aesop’s Fables: Fable 112 – The Chariot of Hermes and the Arabs

    —“One day, Hermes drove across the entire Earth a chariot filled with lies, villainy and fraud. And he distributed a small portion of his cargo in each country he visited. But when he arrived in the country of the Arabs, the chariot suddenly broke down. The Arabs believed he was carrying a precious cargo and so they stole the contents of his chariot. Hermes was then unable to carry on into the countries of other peoples. More than all other people the Arabs are liars and cheats. Indeed, there is not even a word for ‘truth’ in their language.”—Aesop

    This is why our people aren’t compatible. And Taleb has engaged in the same form of sophism that gave license to the great lies of Judaism (undermine), Christianity (pacify), and Islam (consume), which is creating elaborate sentimental stories in order to engage in and justify the ancient hatred of the landless tribal people, and the settled farming people: the battle of Cain and Able: the farmers trust, commons and their cities, against the sheep herders and their lack of capital, trust, and its multipliers in the commons.

    [End]

    ( @nntaleb#nntaleb Nassim Nicholas Taleb )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:24:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576386605002984

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576384220810882

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    THE OTHER REASON TALEB IS WRONG. THE UN-TRUSTWORTHY. By Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute We presume intelligence is the driving factor in our differences in life outcomes. It’s just the driving factor for (a) rate of learning (b) working with complexity. Conscientiousness is evenly distributed across the spectrum of complexity regardless of intelligence. So the market demand is for minimum necessary intelligence and conscientiousness. And then by intelligence sufficient for the degree of complexity. But, what isn’t in that dichotomy is our incentives. This is where Taleb makes his second mistake. Just as we pay police to avoid corruption, we pay people more to avoid corruption. We are not paid just for conscientiousness, or just for complexity, but for loyalty and consequence. So instead of just Intelligence, we have: a) Reward for Conscientiousness (quality), b) Reward for Intelligence (complexity), c) Reward for Scarcity (by income) , and d) Reward for Insurance (by status and security) The Chinese bureaucracy was successful, because of the training and incentive against corruption, in exchange for the status and predictability of income – and why the German and French have been, and why the American has not been, and why the Semitic people have never been able to develop (a) civic trust or truthful speech (b) commons, (c) governments at scale, (d) nations at scale, (e) companies at scale (f) economies at scale, (g) a durable civilization without consuming an existing great one, and (h) why the Semites produce an ibn Khaldun (low trust), instead of Locke, Smith, Hume, Hamilton, Adams, and Jefferson, Pareto, Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Nietzsche or Hayek (High Trust). Taleb hates the answer: (a) intelligence matters in the suppression of parasitism, (b) rewarding it with income, status, and security matters in the suppression of parasitism (c) dysgenia results from low trust, poverty results from low trust, and inability to innovate results from low trust, leaving only consumption and distrust and small scale corrupt organizations, (d) he and his ‘Fat Tony’ profit only because in a high trust society and civilization under rule of law, with scale institutions, both private and public, the opportunities for immoral (non-productive) windfalls exist – precisely because we are so high trust we never even THINK of the kinds of scams that Taleb, Fat Tony, (George Soros), imagine. In other words, all Taleb has managed to do across his books is explain why he could come to the west to make money but his people live in ignorance, superstition, tribalism, deceit, and relative poverty. ( … continued )

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576384220810882

  • THE OTHER REASON TALEB IS WRONG. THE UN-TRUSTWORTHY. By Curt Doolittle, The Prop

    THE OTHER REASON TALEB IS WRONG. THE UN-TRUSTWORTHY.
    By Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute

    We presume intelligence is the driving factor in our differences in life outcomes. It’s just the driving factor for (a) rate of learning (b) working with complexity. Conscientiousness is evenly distributed across the spectrum of complexity regardless of intelligence. So the market demand is for minimum necessary intelligence and conscientiousness. And then by intelligence sufficient for the degree of complexity. But, what isn’t in that dichotomy is our incentives. This is where Taleb makes his second mistake. Just as we pay police to avoid corruption, we pay people more to avoid corruption. We are not paid just for conscientiousness, or just for complexity, but for loyalty and consequence.

    So instead of just Intelligence, we have:
    a) Reward for Conscientiousness (quality),
    b) Reward for Intelligence (complexity),
    c) Reward for Scarcity (by income) , and
    d) Reward for Insurance (by status and security)

    The Chinese bureaucracy was successful, because of the training and incentive against corruption, in exchange for the status and predictability of income – and why the German and French have been, and why the American has not been, and why the Semitic people have never been able to develop (a) civic trust or truthful speech (b) commons, (c) governments at scale, (d) nations at scale, (e) companies at scale (f) economies at scale, (g) a durable civilization without consuming an existing great one, and (h) why the Semites produce an ibn Khaldun (low trust), instead of Locke, Smith, Hume, Hamilton, Adams, and Jefferson, Pareto, Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Nietzsche or Hayek (High Trust).

    Taleb hates the answer: (a) intelligence matters in the suppression of parasitism, (b) rewarding it with income, status, and security matters in the suppression of parasitism (c) dysgenia results from low trust, poverty results from low trust, and inability to innovate results from low trust, leaving only consumption and distrust and small scale corrupt organizations, (d) he and his ‘Fat Tony’ profit only because in a high trust society and civilization under rule of law, with scale institutions, both private and public, the opportunities for immoral (non-productive) windfalls exist – precisely because we are so high trust we never even THINK of the kinds of scams that Taleb, Fat Tony, (George Soros), imagine. In other words, all Taleb has managed to do across his books is explain why he could come to the west to make money but his people live in ignorance, superstition, tribalism, deceit, and relative poverty.

    ( … continued )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576384220810882

  • IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE O

    IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.

    —“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi

    —“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy

    Adam, (All);

    1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.

    2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.

    3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..

    4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.

    – Cheers

    ( cc @stefanmolyneux
    Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
    I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
    I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
    It’s suicidal.
    )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:13:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576343837518901

  • WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY

    WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY THAT BEHAVIOR.
    by Luke Weinhagen

    The left used these feminine techniques only because the techniques have proven effective against their opponents. Not because the left possesses any of the feminine virtues these manipulation techniques are effective at leveraging.

    We can not guilt the left, they feel no guilt.
    We can not shame the left, they feel no shame.
    We can not moralize the left, they hold no moral to leverage.

    Every manifestation of GRRSM shows up for the left as an alert to possible ostracism from the herd (why they always end up finding their way from all the others to “rally”).

    We do not use GRRSM to manipulate the left. We have absolutely no expectation of them changing their behavior.

    We use GRRSM against the left to remind each other it is ok to be disgusted by that behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:10:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576334220347874

  • THE LEFT AND “DOPAMINE HARVESTING” —“I started noticing these trite, snide lef

    THE LEFT AND “DOPAMINE HARVESTING”

    —“I started noticing these trite, snide lefty phrases appearing in comment threads. It’s how shitty people harvest dopamine from each other. Thankfully, mostly in private.”–Dylan Boswell

    (Awesome New Term!)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:09:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576331028403015

  • VIA TWITTER My job is to cut thru the ignorance error bias and deceit. I am very

    VIA TWITTER

    My job is to cut thru the ignorance error bias and deceit.
    I am very good at it. Genocide and mass migration are the most decisive sources of change in all of history. They are the black swans: events whose consequences nullify all others. And you are generating demand for war.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:06:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576315507627686

  • DEFINITION: “CONSPIRITUALISM” (yes, it’s a thing) Conspiritualism (kohn-SPEAR-ih

    DEFINITION: “CONSPIRITUALISM”
    (yes, it’s a thing)

    Conspiritualism
    (kohn-SPEAR-iht-yool-izum.)

    “The use of conspiracy theories to produce the psychological defense against ignorance, inability, and resulting lack of agency that was previously satisfied by supernatural religions; A form of anthropomorphism, where the psychological defense consists of the possibility of organizing emotions and arguments against one’s non-existent oppressors, and providing both mindfulness and a means of catharsis (relief) from persistent anxiety over one’s current condition.”

    SEE CONSPIRITUALITY (FEMINISM)
    tandfonline.com/…/…/10.1080/13537903.2011.539

    Abstract
    The female-dominated New Age (with its positive focus on self) and the male-dominated realm of conspiracy theory (with its negative focus on global politics) may seem antithetical.

    There is a synthesis of the two, however, that we call ‘conspirituality’.

    We define, describe, and analyse this hybrid system of belief; it has been noticed before without receiving much scholarly attention.

    Conspirituality is a rapidly growing web movement expressing an ideology fuelled by political disillusionment and the popularity of alternative worldviews.

    It has international celebrities, bestsellers, radio and TV stations.

    It offers a broad politico-spiritual philosophy based on two core convictions, the first traditional to conspiracy theory, the second rooted in the New Age:

    1) a secret group covertly controls, or is trying to control, the political and social order, and

    2) humanity is undergoing a ‘paradigm shift’ in consciousness.

    Proponents believe that the best strategy for dealing with the threat of a totalitarian ‘new world order’ is to act in accordance with an awakened ‘new paradigm’ worldview.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:01:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576299549693137

  • DEFINITION: INTERSECTIONALITY (Conspiracy Theory)(Conspiritualism) (Anti-Darwini

    DEFINITION: INTERSECTIONALITY
    (Conspiracy Theory)(Conspiritualism) (Anti-Darwinian)

    Intersectionality, also referred to as intersectional feminism, is a branch of feminism which identifies how different aspects of social and political discrimination overlap with gender. The term was coined by black feminist scholar Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in 1989.

    It is a non-empirical qualitative analytic framework that identifies how interlocking systems of power affect those who are most marginalized in society.

    There are various forms of social stratification, such as class, race, sexual orientation, age, religion, creed, disability and gender, which are included in the consideration of intersectional feminism and its social and cultural effects.

    The purpose of intersectionality is to identify that these forms of discrimination are related to one another, and take these relationships into account when working to promote social and political equity.

    While the theory began as an exploration of the oppression of women of color within society, today the analysis has expanded to include many more aspects of social identity.

    Intersectionality may also be related to the term triple oppression, which engages with similar themes.

    Critics have pointed out that intersectionality relies entirely on non-objective concepts such as “systems of power” which themselves lack a material reality, and therefore empirical basis for study, making it an ideological set of ideas, and not a proper sociological concept.

    (See “Conspiratualism” at: facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157386088)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576288904451780

  • PROSECUTION OF THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD OF DECEIT ISN’T ‘NICE’. —“You seem nice.”-

    PROSECUTION OF THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD OF DECEIT ISN’T ‘NICE’.

    —“You seem nice.”—Jacob T. Levy @jtlevy, @Mattzwolinski

    Prosecutors aren’t nice, and I’m immune to Pilpul(sophism) and Critique (shaming > ridiculing > psychologizing > moralizing > rallying in order to circumvent argument by using the female means of social conflict by undermining. Hold an argument or not. Reciprocate or not.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:55:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576272490484771

  • So, you’re a parasite, a liar, and a fraud, attempting to destroy that which our

    So, you’re a parasite, a liar, and a fraud, attempting to destroy that which our ancestors risked the anglo scottish enlightenment, the english civil war, and the revolutionary war, to construct, and which generations died to persist. you want socialism. To end the third way.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 23:14:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158879099689066496

    Reply addressees: @s_cala

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @s_cala You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @s_cala You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368