Theme: Deception

  • GSRRM is admission of lack of argument, by resorting to poisoning the well, unde

    GSRRM is admission of lack of argument, by resorting to poisoning the well, undermining, ad reputation destruction: the use of female’s conflict strategy of disapproval and outcasting in male’s rational discourse on the truth. 😉

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/23/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:27:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174087465872875520

    Reply addressees: @jbouie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418


    IN REPLY TO:

    @jbouie

    there’s a lot you could critique about my writing and the arguments i choose to make but for whatever reason the standard line for guys like williamson is that i’m an ignorant know-nothing

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418

  • The Jewish Question Answered Yet Again

    —“Scientific racism, a thread: In March, a journal published a paper defending the “theory” that Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychology, multiculturalism, Marxism and left-wing political movements in general are best understood in terms of “Jewish group evolutionary strategy.” — Simon Whitten @Simon_Whitten

    It’s true Simon. Sorry. You can trace Aristotelian thought, you can trace Jewish thought. You can trace every civilization’s group strategy. I work on the female and jewish conflict technique of False Promise, Baiting, Pilpul (sophism), Critique (Undermining), GSRRM (avoidance), Polyethicalism, Feminine Conflict. … And the adaptation of the female conflict strategy (Undermining, reputation destruction, gossiping) to abrahamic religion in the ancient world, and Freud, Marx, Boas, Cantor, Frankfurt and Derrida and your generation in the post-marxist world. Forensics are rather easy whether symbolic, artistic, linguistic, argumentative, literary, metaphysical, technological, legal, even mathematical differences between civilizations, and jewish strategy has been consistent since at least the Abrahamic period if not before. Specializing in unproductive (parasitic) income sources, especially those that privatize the commons, especially the moral, using the profits to seek rents, baiting into moral hazard, justification by Pilpul, undermining by Critique, Non argument by GSRRM, alliance with the … … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal), I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance. We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be silenced by threat, and until mid 20th you would be silenced by defamation laws for your action. When, in retrospect, this is a group strategy of females, jews, muslims and christians: undermining. So, perhaps you might do less to prove Macdonald (and me) right, by not demonstrating so obviously that the strategy of undermining has been the group strategy of females against dominant males, and the Jews against the great civilizations of the ancient and modern world. My people committed plenty of crimes under colonialism but we still dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of the semitic mystical dark ages, and we dragged most out of the second jewish attempt (marxism, libertarianism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, neoconservatism). What did your people accomplish as the most literate people in europe over 1800 years? Absolutely nothing except mysticism, tax collection, usury, prostitution, slaving, alcohol and drugs, conspiracy against the population, and being chased from one moral purge after another? Your people have mastered and institutionalized the art of female parasitism by false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining) without producing young in exchange for our tolerance. Wasn’t one dark age of ignorance suffering and destruction enough? All debts are paid. How do you pay restitution for your crimes against not only our people, but european people, the 1B dead because of abrahamism, the lost peoples, empires, arts and literature of the ancient world, as you incite undermining at every opportunity, everywhere. The gig is up. We know. Judgement day comes.

  • The Jewish Question Answered Yet Again

    —“Scientific racism, a thread: In March, a journal published a paper defending the “theory” that Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychology, multiculturalism, Marxism and left-wing political movements in general are best understood in terms of “Jewish group evolutionary strategy.” — Simon Whitten @Simon_Whitten

    It’s true Simon. Sorry. You can trace Aristotelian thought, you can trace Jewish thought. You can trace every civilization’s group strategy. I work on the female and jewish conflict technique of False Promise, Baiting, Pilpul (sophism), Critique (Undermining), GSRRM (avoidance), Polyethicalism, Feminine Conflict. … And the adaptation of the female conflict strategy (Undermining, reputation destruction, gossiping) to abrahamic religion in the ancient world, and Freud, Marx, Boas, Cantor, Frankfurt and Derrida and your generation in the post-marxist world. Forensics are rather easy whether symbolic, artistic, linguistic, argumentative, literary, metaphysical, technological, legal, even mathematical differences between civilizations, and jewish strategy has been consistent since at least the Abrahamic period if not before. Specializing in unproductive (parasitic) income sources, especially those that privatize the commons, especially the moral, using the profits to seek rents, baiting into moral hazard, justification by Pilpul, undermining by Critique, Non argument by GSRRM, alliance with the … … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal), I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance. We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be silenced by threat, and until mid 20th you would be silenced by defamation laws for your action. When, in retrospect, this is a group strategy of females, jews, muslims and christians: undermining. So, perhaps you might do less to prove Macdonald (and me) right, by not demonstrating so obviously that the strategy of undermining has been the group strategy of females against dominant males, and the Jews against the great civilizations of the ancient and modern world. My people committed plenty of crimes under colonialism but we still dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of the semitic mystical dark ages, and we dragged most out of the second jewish attempt (marxism, libertarianism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, neoconservatism). What did your people accomplish as the most literate people in europe over 1800 years? Absolutely nothing except mysticism, tax collection, usury, prostitution, slaving, alcohol and drugs, conspiracy against the population, and being chased from one moral purge after another? Your people have mastered and institutionalized the art of female parasitism by false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining) without producing young in exchange for our tolerance. Wasn’t one dark age of ignorance suffering and destruction enough? All debts are paid. How do you pay restitution for your crimes against not only our people, but european people, the 1B dead because of abrahamism, the lost peoples, empires, arts and literature of the ancient world, as you incite undermining at every opportunity, everywhere. The gig is up. We know. Judgement day comes.

  • The gig is up. We know

    The gig is up.

    We know.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:36:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174059635868930048

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174059536732348418


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten All debts are paid. How do you pay restitution for your crimes against not only our people, but european people, the 1B dead because of abrahamism, the lost peoples, empires, arts and literature of the ancient world, as you incite undermining at every opportunity, everywhere.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174059536732348418


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten All debts are paid. How do you pay restitution for your crimes against not only our people, but european people, the 1B dead because of abrahamism, the lost peoples, empires, arts and literature of the ancient world, as you incite undermining at every opportunity, everywhere.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174059536732348418

  • Your people have mastered and institutionalized the art of female parasitism by

    Your people have mastered and institutionalized the art of female parasitism by false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining) without producing young in exchange for our tolerance. Wasn’t one dark age of ignorance suffering and destruction enough?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:35:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174059285938151425

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174058873675821056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten What did your people accomplish as the most literate people in europe over 1800 years? Absolutely nothing except mysticism, tax collection, usury, prostitution, slaving, alcohol and drugs, conspiracy against the population, and being chased from one moral purge after another?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174058873675821056


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten What did your people accomplish as the most literate people in europe over 1800 years? Absolutely nothing except mysticism, tax collection, usury, prostitution, slaving, alcohol and drugs, conspiracy against the population, and being chased from one moral purge after another?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174058873675821056

  • So, perhaps you might do less to prove Macdonald (and me) right, by not demonstr

    So, perhaps you might do less to prove Macdonald (and me) right, by not demonstrating so obviously that the strategy of undermining has been the group strategy of females against dominant males, and the Jews against the great civilizations of the ancient and modern world.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:29:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174057826127360000

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174057349197258752


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be silenced by threat, and until mid 20th you would be silenced by defamation laws for your action. When, in retrospect, this is a group strategy of females, jews, muslims and christians: undermining.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174057349197258752


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten We had laws against scolds (what you’re doing), and under the duel you would be silenced by threat, and until mid 20th you would be silenced by defamation laws for your action. When, in retrospect, this is a group strategy of females, jews, muslims and christians: undermining.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174057349197258752

  • I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all c

    I mean, you don’t know that you’re doing it right now. You think (as would all cognitively female humans) that you’re making an argument but you’re just engaging in reputation destruction rather than argument, and from a position of presumption bias and ignorance.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:25:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056778583162880

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Simon_Whitten … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal),

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Simon_Whitten … state against the people (See Benjamin Ginsberg), against the people, inability to create commons of their own, dependence on higher trust moral polities. Match this with differences in rates of mental illness and sexual dimorphism (cognitive, sexual, behavioral, criminal),

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174056452677353472

  • It’s true Simon. Sorry. You can trace Aristotelian thought, you can trace jewish

    It’s true Simon. Sorry. You can trace Aristotelian thought, you can trace jewish thought. You can trace every civilization’s group strategy. I work on False Promise, Baiting, Pilpul (sophism), Critique (Undermining), GSRRM (avoidance), Polyethicalism, Feminine Conflict. …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 20:14:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174053950833799168

    Reply addressees: @Simon_Whitten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173319663322841088


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173319663322841088

  • Or is your moralizing just a shallow attempt to obscure the underlying costs and

    Or is your moralizing just a shallow attempt to obscure the underlying costs and privileges?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:46:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174031824122777600

    Reply addressees: @JaneCaro

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174031716463325184


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JaneCaro That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring to survive because they have no other choice. Women don’t want the burden of bearing, surrendering to adoption, or caring. If women will not pay to birth them then men should not pay to raise them. That is a reciprocal exchange.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174031716463325184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JaneCaro That is a Just trade. Men want their offspring to survive because they have no other choice. Women don’t want the burden of bearing, surrendering to adoption, or caring. If women will not pay to birth them then men should not pay to raise them. That is a reciprocal exchange.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174031716463325184

  • Excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). You want to restore the right to kill fet

    Excellent example of Pilpul (Sophism). You want to restore the right to kill fetuses, just as women have killed newborns, and young children for thousands of years by exposure, suffocation, and strangulation. Women have murdered more children then all the wars of men combined.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 18:42:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174030835361755136

    Reply addressees: @JaneCaro

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173816850548805633


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JaneCaro

    I have been fighting for reproductive rights for over 40 years, yet some forced birthers still appear to think that their justifications (exclusively religiously based) are so persuasive they will magically change my mind. Save your emails people, I’ve heard ‘em all.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173816850548805633