Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • KING OF THE HILL GAMES EXPOSE THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE —“The most surprising thin

    KING OF THE HILL GAMES EXPOSE THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE

    —“The most surprising thing Curt Doolittle’s king of the hill games revealed to me (and there’s been a lot of surprising things) was that Christians are just as infuriating to argue with as leftists. Say one honest unflattering thing about Christianity and they come flying out of the woodwork to smite you with fire and brimstone! Oh and the pouting and stomping their feet and the recriminations and the Bible verse quoting and condemnation… it’s too much.”— Shannon Constantine

    (Shannon makes my point about abrahamism better than I can)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 19:51:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATING EQUALITY by Bill Joslin “Equality” is a term that’s been repeated

    DISAMBIGUATING EQUALITY

    by Bill Joslin

    “Equality” is a term that’s been repeatedly … gang-r@ped.

    CONTEXT ONE: BOOLEAN ASSESSMENT OF CATEGORICAL MEMBERSHIP.

    All players on the ice exist equally as “HOCKEY PLAYERS” bound by the same rules (membership). However, not all hockey players play hockey equally (qualitative assessment).

    CONTEXT TWO: ISONOMY

    State application of power will be applied to all by the same criteria (equality before the law)

    CONNECTION BETWEEN THESE TWO CONTEXTS:

    isonomy presumes that all who fall under the law exist, at the very minimum, as agents and thus, as agents, fall under the law.

    “Created Equally” was a notion by Americans adopted from their French influencers… the French ruin everything.

    —

    Definitions:

    … Isonomy: “equality before the law”

    … nomocracy: “rule of law”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 17:25:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ERROR AND FRAUD —“The difference between error and frau

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ERROR AND FRAUD

    —“The difference between error and fraud is that an error implies good intentions, and people want to trade in their good intentions for a discount on the costs they themselves pay for the results of their error.”—Rustle More

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 13:45:00 UTC

  • JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s Thoug

    JOHN MARK EXPLAINS MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s Thoughts, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    THE METHOD TO THE APPARENT MADNESS

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – CurtUpdated Oct 12, 2019, 11:12 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC

  • MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY (core)(important) To John’s explanation, I’ll add th

    MY POSITION ON CHRISTIANITY

    (core)(important)

    To John’s explanation, I’ll add this:

    1. SUPPRESSION OF FALSEHOOD AND ITS CONSEQUENCES – My work has a nearly single minded objective, and that ending lying in public speech. So, I’m not complaining about just christianity, but the falsehoods by which the abrahamic religions are constructed, the means of conveying those falsehoods, the consequences of teaching christians how to lie using the abrahamic method, and the consequences of christians lying using the abrahamic method, that makes the entire polity vulnerable to marxist, feminine, postmodern pseudoscience, sophism and denial, just as christianity judaism and islam were spread by supernaturalism, sophism, and denial of reality. As such my objective is the opposite of Augustine and Aquinas, which is to integrate greek reason into christianity on supernatural terms, and instead integrate christianity into western science and reason on scientific terms.

    2. A POLITICAL RELIGION – Christianity, when expressed in secular scientific terms, is in fact an optimum SOCIAL and adequate PERSONAL religion even if it is not an optimum POLITICAL religion -which is why it failed to achieve what islam and judaism did, and why it has declined rapidly in the modern era. My goal is to license political religion so that we cannot be undermined again.

    2. RESTORING A STATE RELIGION TO EXLUDE OTHERS – I’m trying to discover a way to make christianity a state religion by converting it to secular terms – this is possible because christianity and only christianity among the abrahamic religions is compatible with natural law. Christians despise the fact that the lessons of christianity in scientific terms, are optimum strategies for social cooperation at least at interpersonal scale. Because the magic and ‘woo woo’ is lost by doing so restoring dependence upon reason, instead of allowing us to fall into pacifist intuition where we can abandon reason. (which is why religions work to sedate humans.) So over the long term I work to produce a christian law that is inviolate, like sharia, so to speak, from the natural law, and the christian extension of the natural law, by the exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation or prosecution.

    3. RESTORING THE BALANCE OF POWERS – If I can convert Christianity to secular terms I can restore the church as the political agency responsible for the individual and family, limiting the government to the material, and restore competition between family-church and commerce-government, and military-state. It is this division and competition i’m seeking to restore. (I don’t tell you these things because they taint the audience by letting them know my purposes. I only explain afterward, so that my attacks on any given subject make sense in retrospect. In other words, I’m a scientist. I run tests. The public willing to engage in intellectually honest discourse serves as my testing laboratory.)

    4. MULTIPLE CLASSES MULTIPLE RELIGIONS, SAME MESSAGE – All religions are class religions. Westerners practice a personal religion of Jesus (lower), a social religion of christianity (middle), an secular religion of philosophy (upper middle), a political religion of the law and the sciences that extend the law (upper). The Chinese have confucianism, the Dao, and buddhism, nationalism and familialism. Every culture other than judaism and islam have class religions. And we have and need our class religions.

    5. MULTIPLE GENDERS: ADD MASCULINITY TO RELIGION – There are those of us for whom the philosophy of secular christianity – it’s cooperation – is merely valuable, but for whom our ancestors, culture, nation, civilization are more precious than the false promise of an evil semitic god. And so if we categorize heathenry as the thanks to nature not denial of it, and paganism as thanks to heroes of our history, and the archetypes that are non-submissive to nature and heroic in achievement rather than heroic in tolerance. So I am continuing my process of investigation into whether it is possible to unite these scientific, natural, and christian, traditions in a constitution, that prohibits competition by which to undermine them. And whether they can be practiced together or separately. So again, I see myself trying to unite western civilization against further destruction. And I am doing so by the same means as did those great men who came before me, in every great time of change.

    There is a deep method to the appearance of my madness. Do not assume you grasp what I am doing. Much of what I do requires I maintain your ignorance of what I am doing, in order to ensure I collect quality information from the population. This is how all behavioral science must be conducted. And it’s how I conduct it.

    – Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:12:00 UTC

  • LUNATICS, ADDICTS, AND LIARS ALL SHOW THEIR COLORS EVENTUALLY —” About the Err

    LUNATICS, ADDICTS, AND LIARS ALL SHOW THEIR COLORS EVENTUALLY

    —” About the Error #1, I submit the following: America itself with those 40 million people with 400 million guns are proving that it is possible. THEY, not the US Military, are protecting the homeland from boots-on-the-ground invasion. I am for saving the Republic not overthrowing it. Indeed the starting point is “how do I get a territory where I can determine the law”.— Gunther Schadow

    Yes but they don’t want an anarchic polity. They want a restoration of the constitution of natural rights. There is no evidence that they don’t want the classical liberal tradition.

    I am for saving the republic as we did during the last civil war by forcibly altering the constitution regardless of the political process such that necessary reforms are permitted.

    So you lied again that I want to overthrow the government and replace it rather than reform the constitution and modernize it.

    —“At this very moment, your P is as much a non-existing utopia as Hoppe’s A. Nothing that you say can change that. So all your arguments about “has never been done” and “cannot be done” do not apply. You may dream up something as the lone dreamer that you are, and you can claim all you want, and you can collect minions on the internet all you want. And you can refuse to consider arguments that do not adopt your autistic language first.”—

    Well that’s not true. The only difference between the current constitution and mine is strict construction, precise enumeration, and the extension of the current prohibition on false and fraudulent commercial speech to fraudulent political speech, and from criminal speech (conspiracy) to criminal political speech. The rest is just choices of the series of means of separation that permit local specialization of policy while providing unified defense as the framers intended. I mean, P is a methodology, but effectively the constitution I’m proposing just adapts the construction of commons to current conditions.

    —“But the reality is that you are but one man with a bunch of crazies on the internet dreaming of his great revolution in which for some reason his faction would win.”—

    And you are one man without crazies. And hoppe and rothbard have crazies that have failed for forty years now. and contributed to western failure. All revolutionaries are crazies, that tells us nothing. You’d have called Darwin a crazy, and happily killed aristotle as well as socrates.

    —“No, until then, you need to be held responsible to the belching and farting of your minions who you sit together in a room with dreaming your pipe dreams. All those “dealing with the Joo Qoo” and “Hitler was right” and that crude Hitlerian anticapitalist sentiments you are grooming around you (like one guy actually told me that “the economy shouldn’t have priority over the people” when I pointed out how foolish it is to round up and deport people who immigrated after 1965, shit like that.”—

    You are welcome to disagree on truth vs falsehood. If you want to disagree on preferable vs not then that’s not important here. I do truth, not preference.

    (I leave like and dislike for women and half men.)

    —-“When your minion-knights actually ride out in their attempt to assume power, there will be lots and lots of other powers who compete with you, and you have nothing to prove you would fare any better than Hoppe. Except you have a bunch of fascists around you who may be good with the rapid radical and murderous ascension to power, followed by foolishly squandering away the resources that they have violently and illegitimately conquered.”—

    Well you know, you are just venting your frustration.

    What will happen is ALL factions will ride out, and chaos will ensue and people will gravitate to a solution that appeals to them.

    —“I came here EXCITED about the IDEA and PROMISE of using formal definitions, scientific reasoning, truthful DILIGENT speech using operationalizable terms, and rule of law to reform our polity in America and world wide. “—

    That’s a lie right? You came here an ancap at worst, a civnat at best, a continental and a christian. You cam searching for a way to enforce what you wanted. I supplied away to enforce truth, reciprocity, and competitive necessity – which falsifies some of your wants. You just don’t like it.

    Yet you aren’t complaining about formal definitions, scientific reasoning, truthful diligent speech in operationalizable terms, and rule of law to reform our polity and America world wide, are you?

    Which of those have you complained about? None.

    What have you complained about? Every single time, the application of truth to TABOOS.

    Why? Why are you afraid of the truth such that you can’t speak of the taboos?

    And what have you offered us to repair the current conflict except the same silly political tweaks that have been proposed for fifty years? Nothing.

    So what you want from me is to stop falsifying and stop undermining falsehoods. And to simply agree with your sentiments. You are worried about people being OFFENDED and asked to LEARN. I am doing the opposite. I’m worried about TEACHING PEOPLE regardless of whether they’re offended by the truth or not.

    Because that’ is what ‘western’ means: truth regardless of cost. That’s what Kant said. THat’s what Aristotle said. That’s what I say.

    —-“””However, as soon as I noticed you are full of mythological shit and can’t let go of your Aryan master race mythology and that non-operationalizable “abrahamism” word, and you refuse to teach your minions to not be fascists while you fire them on while at the same time denying it (you are a liar actually) I got turned off. I don’t need to waste 10 thousand web pages of time to study any further and neither will 90% of those 40 thousand gun owners in America.”—

    What you mean is that I am looking for a way to reform our religion of christianity such that it is no longer a means by which our people are made vulnerable to the abrahamic methods of deceit we see in feminism, postmodernism, and marxism, as well as judaism, christianity, and islam. I want to outlaw this form of lying in public speech..

    This offends you. Because it forces you to put truth before comfort regardless of cost.

    No philosopher achieves his ultimate end, but by discovering the ultimate ends, he moves the polity some number of steps toward them.

    —“You and John Mark (who won’t show his face, why?) “–

    My understanding is that people are doxxed and it affects their income. I no nothing at all about him. I don’t need to. Either a man’s words are true and reciprocal or false and irreciprocal.

    —“are playing with fire. Your minions are using some of that same rhetoric as the NZ mosque shooter, accelerationism. And one day you’ll have a few 100 men stupid enough to begin with aggression (all perfectly justified by your ideology). “—

    Where do you see that? You mean, instead, that there are people who come here because I truthfully discuss the Taboos, and so THEY are whacky. All of our people are trying to restore the need to fight to the anglo liberty tradition because of the failure of rothbardian and hoppeian pacifism. And I am at least, Eli is as well, saying that the solution is no longer possible democratically because it is no longer possible demographically.

    Regardless you are again GSRRM instead of asking whether P is true, you’re just lying again. So I’ll repeat what I said earlier: Yet you aren’t complaining about formal definitions, scientific reasoning, truthful diligent speech in operationalizable terms, and rule of law to reform our polity and america world wide, are you? Which of those have you complained about? None.

    You’re a liar. You are a liar by failure of due diligence. A carrier of others lies because of your failure of due diligence. And you don’t do your due diligence because either you are lazy, psychologically incompetent, or intellectually unable.

    —“And then the fascist tyranny that’s already siting at the levers of power will have enough to persecute all of the dissident right. “—

    Well, you know, that’s because you don’t know that what I’m proposing in the constitution is very hard for all but ideological leftists to disagree with. A scientists has to discover limits. That doesn’t mean you make use of them.

    —“But they aren’t as stupid as your minions are. It’s going to be a slow boiling death. Your crowd here for whom you are responsible fits the definition of terrorism and your ethno Aryan master race bullshit has gambled away all your moral authority already.”—

    Well, as far as I know I’m trying to restore the jeffersonian constitution under threat that if we don’t, then we will quite happily do something far less desirable. This is to remove the negotiation position like I have said for years.

    Sorry man, but the evidence is that (a) we have superior demographics, (b) superior balance of neoteny, depth of maturity, and dimorphism. (c) are the only people who have produced testimonial truth and reason, science and medicine, and have done so with a small population in a remote portion of euroasia, at the edge of the bronze age. (d) and have single handedly in this world and the ancient, dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty hard work, disease and suffering with that civilization and genetic distribution.

    Sorry man, but the semitic religions are a crime against humanity and I’m trying to find a way to replace them with something that supplies demand but doesn’t include the Semitic cancers. My insight is truth and truth alone. And truth is unforgiving.

    So to say we are superior is simply true. To say that other people can imitate at least our truth and rule of law and eugenics and they will also become superior in a few generations, is also true.

    —“And there is even the big question how come that John Mark suddenly appears on the scene with that big boom and is your herald? Where does he come from? What funds do you have? “—

    Do a search. I’m a serial entrepreneur. I retired in my late 40’s to do this full time. That said, on purpose, donations pay for the institute and its costs. It’s a trivial cost. We collect trivial donations. Mostly from regulars. Why? I never want to have to modify my work to suit an income stream.

    Lots of people come and go. It has always been our strategy that I would do the R&D and others would take it to market, for reasons that are relatively obvious – mostly comprehensibility. John decided this was the answer he wanted to promote. So did eli. so has everyone else.

    —“Why doesn’t your stuff get blocked on YouTube? The thought that this is a honey trap is not at all far fetched. “—

    Ok now you have gone from borderline to full fledge lunatic.

    The reason I don’t get blocked is rather obvious. I don’t do hate speech. And I don’t post videos on controversial taboos. I only post on philosophy – and moreover, partly by design, they aren’t intellectually accessible to many. So others get blocked. The newest guy did yesterday. But as we continue to grow I expect to maintain technical content myself, others to education, others to rally, and others to test the margins.

    —“And why are you Curt siting in the Western Ukraine where the Stepan Bandera emblem wearing Nazis are celebrating their comeback aided and abetted by the deep state that is also running the coup against Donald Trump? So many questions that need to be talked about on common terms, not on your terms.”—

    Who says I’m in Ukraine. I’m in the states. I formed the institute and my companies in Ukraine, and as far as I know I’m married and a resident there. However, Ive been here in the states (a) restoring my health, and (b) taking care of a seriously ill parent. (c) investing in a revolution I’ve been predicting for fifteen years now.

    HERE IS THE REAL ISSUE

    Be a fucking gentleman, ask questions, and seek to understand. You clearly don’t understand that I work through prosecution of ideas reducing them to first principles, that must be true, rational, and reciprocal. And you’re an ignorant arrogant immature, loudmouth trying desperately to have someone agree with you or educate you on your terms at their cost.

    I’m the real deal. I’m exceptional good at what I do. As far as I know there is no other man living that has made anywhere near the progress I have.

    So If…

    You want an ideology go find one.

    You want a secular theology go find one.

    You want a religion go find one.

    I do truth, which means science, which means true, rational and reciprocal – regardless of costs.

    And if there isn’t a market for it in this decade there will be in another.

    And stop wasting my time.

    Your argument isn’t over truth it’s over preference and I do truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 13:40:00 UTC

  • WHY IS DEBATING AGAINST P SO UNPLEASANT? Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Reco

    WHY IS DEBATING AGAINST P SO UNPLEASANT?

    Listening to EMJ debate Dutton and Recognizing the profound difference between Argument and Error, vs Prosecution and Lying. So the reason it’s so painful for others to argue with us, is that if you use operational terms you can’t testify to something you claim you can, then you’re lying or engaging in fraud, while if you’re argument in ideal language instead of operational, you’re just making an error. This is why people hate arguing with us. That not only do we eliminate the ability to engage in sophism, but we don’t call it error, we call it lying, fraud, and deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 11:58:00 UTC

  • ” Blasphemy is a tool for silencing dissidents, truthful speech otherwise uncoun

    —” Blasphemy is a tool for silencing dissidents, truthful speech otherwise uncounterable.”—Christopher Kilgore

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 21:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182415334386688001

  • ” Blasphemy is a tool for silencing dissidents, truthful speech otherwise uncoun

    —” Blasphemy is a tool for silencing dissidents, truthful speech otherwise uncounterable.”—Christopher Kilgore

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 17:59:00 UTC

  • “The worst thing about undermining is that it is not as easily spotted as the re

    —“The worst thing about undermining is that it is not as easily spotted as the rest.”—Mo’men Mo’een

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-10 12:04:00 UTC