Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • What Does “Bait Into Hazard” Mean?

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean.  Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.

  • RT @ClownBa73413423: @curtdoolittle @AndrewYang There’s a sucker born everyday,

    RT @ClownBa73413423: @curtdoolittle @AndrewYang There’s a sucker born everyday, and a lot of them become journalists.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 21:27:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190379822310182912

  • DEFINING SOCIALISM FOR YANG —“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with

    DEFINING SOCIALISM FOR YANG

    —“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza
    secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497630957500466&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:48:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190354919636819968

  • And fools come for the bait

    And fools come for the bait.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190354237349335040

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190354038006730752

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190354038006730752

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190354038006730752

  • Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let

    Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
    Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
    When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:44:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

  • The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marx

    The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:43:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824

  • WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN? —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any cha

    WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN?

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean

    Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.

    If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.

    If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.

    if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.

    In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 18:42:00 UTC

  • DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY A

    DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.

    —“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—

    No I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. 😉

    Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.

    1. Man can discover and identify (categorize) and name (give name to) sets of constant relations (an identity, referent,).

    2. Man can invent patterns of testing constant-inconstant relations(relations)

    3. Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)

    4. Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.

    5. Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.

    6. Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.

    The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 13:15:00 UTC

  • BELIEF AND PROFESSION OF IT, ARE ALMOST ALWAYS LIES I do not know what you belie

    BELIEF AND PROFESSION OF IT, ARE ALMOST ALWAYS LIES

    I do not know what you believe. I cannot know. I can only determine judge you by your actions. If you testify to an un-testifiable belief, then you can only lie. If you lie then you have a reason to lie. I can only seek to discover the reason you lie. I cannot distinguish a profession of belief in an un-testifiable lie, from any other lie.

    Belief is irrelevant. Either you imitate thew works of jesus or you are just another liar, fraud, and thief.

    Keep a diary of the actions you make in the service of others for no other reason than the love of others, and the cost to you for having done so.

    If it is not an action, is not in the services of others, is not in the service of other by your personal service to them, then you are a liar and a liar, fraud, and thief, and your claims of Christianity are no different from wearing the uniform of those who did service, when you have not done so, a pretending to equal their honor.

    No. You are just a free-rider. A parasite on other’s labors. A free rider on those few christians who exist, just as a free rider on those few warriors that exist.

    A christian ACTS. Profession of belief, and belief are irrelevant.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:58:00 UTC

  • THE NEW BIG LIE: “ONE MAN TO TURN THIS COUNTRY UPSIDE DOWN” Genetically Feminine

    THE NEW BIG LIE: “ONE MAN TO TURN THIS COUNTRY UPSIDE DOWN”

    Genetically Feminine Conflict Strategy,
    … Strategic Practiced Feminine Jewish Strategy,
    … … Formally Articulated Feminine… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497390017524560&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:20:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190242097288404997