Theme: Deception

  • Um. Let me help you. “Fashion” is an lower middle class business, usurped by und

    Um. Let me help you. “Fashion” is an lower middle class business, usurped by underclass undermining, just as art was usurped by underclass undermining. It’s politics. Nonsense gets attention because its novel, while Lauren, Ford, Gucci, get sales.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 20:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218989951003635712

  • DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE Please don’t waste my time. Fi

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE

    Please don’t waste my time. Find the data. Human behavior is 80% inherited and 20% idiosyncratic development of behavior. Races differ in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=558186324778262&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 19:54:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218985214883565569

  • removing falsehoods obscurantism, suggestions, loading, framing and deceits

    removing falsehoods obscurantism, suggestions, loading, framing and deceits


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 17:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218945894260801537

    Reply addressees: @JayDevalles

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218944289385959426


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JayDevalles

    @curtdoolittle What does “laundering” mean in this context?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218944289385959426

  • “The Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory is Dead. We know the structure of the li

    —“The Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory is Dead. We know the structure of the lie and how to unmake it. Prosecute the lies and warranty the truth.”–JWarren Prescott


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:30:00 UTC

  • DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE Please don’t waste my time. Fi

    DON’T WASTE MY TIME. THE POSTMODERN LIES ARE DONE

    Please don’t waste my time. Find the data. Human behavior is 80% inherited and 20% idiosyncratic development of behavior. Races differ in degree of neoteny, and rate of maturity. Genders differ in the distribution of traits and biases because of structural differences in the brain and distributions in the endocrine system, with the stereotypes being true in all walks of life. Neoteny and symmetry are most reproductively desirable always and everywhere. Intelligence is a personality trait. Between trait intelligence and trait conscientiousness and trait agreeableness( female)-disagreeableness(male) we measure and predict all lifetime outcomes, and adding family tradition class outcomes are determined. We can even tell your behavior by the type of crop farmed by your ancestors.

    The difference between races and class is in genetic load, not increase in ability. I other words lower classes carry more defects and mutations. Upper classes maintain position only through selective mating, but are otherwise genetically middle class. Nature nurture was solved pre-2000, gender differences by 2012, genetic and racial differences last year (2019), and we are just about to cross the line into the cognitive differences between races, subraces, classes and genders. There is almost no rotation between genetic and social classes. There is only rotation between economic classes, because markets make it possible for underclasses, lower classes, working classes, and middle classes to achieve “lottery wins”, specifically in business, arts, sports, and entertainment.

    The problem facing each of the races is statistical and genetic: the size of their underclasses was not eliminated through eugenic reproduction like it was in europe and east asia. Instead, neoteny was prevented, and underclass populations expanded because the only defense against warm weather disease gradients is early maturity and large numbers of offspring. While european winter farming, and east asian cold weather rice farming are brutal for those that carry genetic load. By the late middle ages most of europe was genetically middle class. Brit intelligence is largely captured in the middle class (or what we call in the states the upper middle class) and this has not traditionally been a problem in either agrarian or industrial ages – but has become and remains a problem in the post industrial era. Which is why white brits underperform immigrants. So whereas the average IQ of anglos (myself included) was around 115 in the 1860’s, we have lost 15 points, or one standard deviation, in just a hundred and sixty years. Every single one of these underclasses you let in and we let in is crushing both our economies, our cultures, and our future generations.

    Let me put it another way: try to estimate the value of one national point of intelligence. It’s pretty easy. Look what happens under 100, then under 97, then under 93, then under 90. It’s a cliff.

    The average intelligence of your people is more important than yur intelligence in determining your quality of life and that of your offspring and the generations that follow.

    Period. End of story.

    I know this because i know in painful detail the structure of the brain, how it operates down to the molecular level, how genetic information is transferred between generations, how we grow brains in utero and post partum, and the changes brought about by structural differences in transmission of information. I know the research. And I know you don’t.

    You were sold a lot of lies. Your principle challenge in life is unlearning all the lies you were told, to make you an ignorant, useful, domesticated animal for the political classes.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 14:54:00 UTC

  • Bitch slapping you for arrogance because you accused others of obscurantism rath

    Bitch slapping you for arrogance because you accused others of obscurantism rather than just saying the truth: “I don’t understand”. Try the truth. it works. As always Martin answered you clearly. You didn’t understand. Yet you resorted to blaming others.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 13:50:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218893598328049664

    Reply addressees: @scprsp @textortexxel @WorMartiN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218887551886319618


    IN REPLY TO:

    @scprsp

    @curtdoolittle @textortexxel @WorMartiN Me: *asks questions*
    You: *grow up. Ask question*
    WTF is going on here?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218887551886319618

  • NITWITS FROM THE CRITIQUE GALLERY —“Yet, you believe the pseudoscientific cher

    NITWITS FROM THE CRITIQUE GALLERY

    —“Yet, you believe the pseudoscientific cherry picking by “experts” like Judith curry, Tim ball, Richard lindzen etc on the topic of climate change, so much for argument from authority. Just because you dont comprehend the math behind probablistic models used in quantum models, doesn’t mean they are invalid”—Rash Ak

    (a) Curry is the best most neutral skeptic (I don’t recognize ball or linden) and I was directly involved with the movement deeply enough to criticize the people, their malincentives and the failure of its predictions. It’s this behavior and the failure of the predictions I criticize. My position has been, and remains: overpopulation by the underclass is the problem not energy use or consumption. I don’t know yet how much affect we’re having or if that effect is meaningful, and if it’s meaningful the I’m not confident it’s bad. And I”m not confident it’s bad, because this warm interglacial is preferable to the norm: glacial. And even if we determine it’s meaningful and bad then I don’t see any solution to the problem other than vast reduction in human population.

    (b) I comprehend the math just fine, which is why I clearly articulate the cause and consequence of ‘mathiness’ as use of probabilism because the underlying causal relations are still unknown. And the reason I do so is the parallel between the problems of physics, economics, and mathematics, because of the late 19th and early 20th reversion to pre-descartian math just as hilbert complained.

    (c) the quantum and the relativistic models are in conflict for the reasons I’ve described – we have no geometric (classical model) that explains the distribution of probability across the wave form.

    (d) Nit: validity is an unscientific term left over from justificationary philosophy., and imported from mathematics (test of internal consistency). Instead: Repeatable, demonstrable, explanatory, consistent, coherent.

    You will be very hard pressed to find other than one of the best professors of physics or mathematics who can or will debate me on this subject.

    You aren’t capable of this conversation or you would have made a different criticism. And you are clearly pulling sh-t out of your a– from a troll (fake) account to engage in female-jewish critique because you can’t construct an argument on equally articulate terms.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 08:30:00 UTC

  • Sorry all. Mathiness, and mathematical fiction in physics is definitely a proble

    Sorry all. Mathiness, and mathematical fiction in physics is definitely a problem, and attention whoring among mathematical physicists by selling those fictions is ridiculous.

    But this is because they have no classical model (geometric) to explain their probabilism at the subatomic level. Even the most mathy idea – string theory – is likely very close to the explanation of how change moves through the underlying geometry – whatever it is.

    Electric universe theory is simply a material theory and therefore easier to grasp without the mathiness. That said, it’s absolutely positively pseudoscientific nonsense. Same for plasma.

    The reason all of these problems exist, whether mainstream mathy or fringe material, is that we simply haven’t figured out the underlying (and in my expectation, classical, structure of the universe at the sub-particle (wave) level.)

    There is an elegance to P because it operationalizes the psychological, social, political world of thought. But human action is at human scale. That elegance isn’t available to use in physics at the sub-particle level because we can’t yet operationalize it.

    So please don’t associate woo woo with my work because you RIGHTLY PREFER and TRUST a classical, geometric, material, operational description of reality instead of a mathy-probabalistic one. Realize this about YOURSELF and YOUR thought.

    Just because P solves a problem and mathy-physics doesn’t, doesn’t mean mathy physics is wrong. It means it’s incomplete – but yes, when it is complete, I don’t doubt it will be expressible in operational and material terms.

    Woo woo pseudoscience is what I say it is: nonsense.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 07:56:00 UTC

  • Ukraine isn’t unsafe. the Don Basin is unsafe. It’s at war. I’ve never felt safe

    Ukraine isn’t unsafe. the Don Basin is unsafe. It’s at war. I’ve never felt safer in my life than in Ukraine. The USA has so many no-go zones, and so much suppression of that information, you need ‘friends’ to educate you were is safe and where isn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 00:19:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218689418191613952

    Reply addressees: @UchePerkins @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218552907290812422


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JustAFamilyMan_

    Don’t believe the hype about Nigeria you see from Nigerians abroad. Nigeria is a horrible place to live for the average Nigerian. https://t.co/GQgbDZSEsV

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218552907290812422

  • You don’t really understand Trump at all do you? He says you aren’t worthy of re

    You don’t really understand Trump at all do you?

    He says you aren’t worthy of respect. That you’re the deserving subject of ridicule.

    Your social and political weapon of influence is the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=557639094832985&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 21:37:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218648675792146432