Theme: Deception

  • I know you’re a propagandist Paul, but you don’t really get it do you? The centu

    I know you’re a propagandist Paul, but you don’t really get it do you? The century of pseudoscience is over. If there is another president it will be the current one. But there will never be another after him. And you are going to be a symbol of why.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:34:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223283315375005696

    Reply addressees: @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282951657529350


    IN REPLY TO:

    @paulkrugman

    On the other hand, if Biden wins we’ll get … a significant but not radical expansion of the safety net, paid for with taxes on the rich 4/

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282951657529350

  • “[a roman general said european barbarians were …]– Some Poor Fool That Studi

    —“[a roman general said european barbarians were …]– Some Poor Fool That Studied Critical Theory (Jewish Pseudoscientific Theology)

    And …. you’re forgetting that the same roman general, the greek equivalent, the thousands of european chieftains and warriors that proceeded them were all europeans practicing indo european languages, european religions, and the group evolutionary strategy of european peoples.

    I am quite sure I have read more than you have, and that i’ve read more science economics and law than you have. When you read literature it’s the slow version of thought, history a bit faster, economics, law a bit faster, science a bit faster, and mathematics the fastest. The paradigm (grammar) that you read tells us everything about your abilities and susceptibility to error. Error increases rapidly as we depart from economics, and if you read opinion you’re just reading fiction. And you read ‘fiction’. πŸ˜‰ I read fact.

    And, well, you know, you are making a number of rather sophomoric errors here:

    (a) all peoples develop similar norms given their states of development – because a primitive people practice cannibalism doesn’t tell us much other than their state of development.

    (b) all peoples develop some grammar of arguing and persisting their group strategy in their environment, and strangely enough this strategy doesn’t change much over the centuries.

    (c) That grammar (logic) varies from european science, to chinese wisdom, to hindu myth, to greek (platonic) idealism, to abrahamic critique and deceit by supernaturalism pseudoscience and sophism , to african magic.

    (d) that strategy varies from european productivity, to chinese harmony, to hindu castes, to semitic parasitism, to gypsy petty parasitism, to the endemic interpredation of een more primitive peoples.

    (e) the consequence of those strategies and grammars results in vast differences in consequences.

    (f) europeans have practiced soverignty, testimony, jury, law, and materialism (because of metallugy) of some sort since the beginning of the Indo European expansion.

    (g) hindsight is a sophism. moral equivalency across time is a sophism and a deceit. Islam christianity and judaism are a cancer on this earth.

    So, those very basic roots a civilization lays grow trees then forests of dependent ideas behaviors and results.

    Every civlization has erred. West african civilization was just about to enter it’s consolidation phase and the european age of sail had the same effect on west africa as it did on spain and portugal: it created a misallocation of capital by making greater profit from slave trading by africans than by empire construction; greater profit from slave trading and gold import, and conquest by spanish and portugese that was directed to wars of conquest rather than national improvement. And the british lucked out because their focus on commercial development, trade, and colonization instead of slave trading and gold importing, had longer institutional and civilizational consequences – even if, the small percentage of slaves in the USA led to our civil war, our near civil war in the 1960s and the civil war we will likely have shortly.

    You see what happens when you study science, economics and law instead of literature? You discover that the group strategy of a people, the language and wisdom literature of a people that they persist that strategy with, and the organization of the people by military, commercial, theological, or ‘corruption’ determine everything that happens to them – and everything they do – becaues people do what they can in the circumstances with the knowledge that they have.

    And by and large european and east asian civilizations practiced better group strategies, better wisdom literatures, and better EUGENICS than did the people who cannot keep up with them.

    The rest is just ‘noise’ as knowledge and trade work their way through populations and spread across land masses and seas.

    I am very, very good at what I do. And while we all make mistakes I very rarely make errors.

    You will find very few public intellectuals like me who grant access to ordinary people.

    Use it wisely and learn something.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 09:52:00 UTC

  • GSRRM IS ALMOST ALWAYS AN ATTEMPT TO OBSCURE A THEFT —“Why are leftists so kee

    GSRRM IS ALMOST ALWAYS AN ATTEMPT TO OBSCURE A THEFT

    —“Why are leftists so keen to brand you as a racist or supremacist?”— (interviewer to Charles Murray)

    Well, why to murderers, thieves, frauds, free riders, parasites, the conspiratorial, corrupt, converters, invaders, justify their thefts?

    It’s a dumb question.

    Always ask who is stealing what and that tells you the answer.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:13:00 UTC

  • Context pls. Who has tarred what names for what reason? The only word I understo

    Context pls. Who has tarred what names for what reason? The only word I understood was Remainer and I try to keep up with the agitprop – what’s yours?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 22:52:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223016239271948289

    Reply addressees: @Researchlight

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223015641877184512


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Researchlight

    @curtdoolittle They’ve tarred their names forevermore… and were on the wrong side of history

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223015641877184512

  • Or are you just s liar?

    Or are you just s liar?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 20:21:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222978053883809793

    Reply addressees: @rasmansa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222493176277192704


    IN REPLY TO:

    @rasmansa

    Charles Murray is just as racist and just as wrong as he was decades ago, and he still gets regular promotion from “reasonable” people like Sam Harris.

    May we all be as cancelled. https://t.co/3994kbrtdW

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222493176277192704

  • “Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, but usually bad) without pu

    —“Seems like” insinuates an association (bad or good, but usually bad) without putting forth any capital or reliable information to back your claim. The classic “I don’t really know, but I think I know, ya know?”–Zack Passmore

    (It’s an attempt to undermine without warrantying your words.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 19:51:00 UTC

  • It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all l

    It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all live our little lies and frauds and free riding.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:23:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222948587396587520

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @Semiogogue @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84152542_195287838536044_64467661878

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84152542_195287838536044_6446766187836604416_o_195287835202711.jpg I know. I understand. It’s hard to tell if I’m bullshitting or not. But people who know their subject, can tell the difference. I know my Sh—t. πŸ˜‰ P is work. But it it’s life altering in explanatory power. The world will make sense like never before.I know. I understand. It’s hard to tell if I’m bullshitting or not. But people who know their subject, can tell the difference. I know my Sh—t. πŸ˜‰ P is work. But it it’s life altering in explanatory power. The world will make sense like never before.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:08:00 UTC

  • poleznyye idioty Russian for “useful idiot”. We have many well meaning fools

    poleznyye idioty

    Russian for “useful idiot”.

    We have many well meaning fools.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 08:27:00 UTC

  • (Selected Bill Joslin Notes on Curt’s Methods and His Critics) Many criticisms a

    (Selected Bill Joslin Notes on Curt’s Methods and His Critics)

    Many criticisms are residue from king of the hill games and Curt’s research methods.

    Curt will take a position and argue it, just to cause debate. Then through the subsequent “battles” the ideas that survive tend to be correct. He then goes away and refines them then comes back.

    His stance now is that christian ethics are scientific – the notion of P prosecuting Christians stems from their misunderstanding that testimonialism pertains to all and any speech acts – it applies to public speech acts (speaking to the public about matters public) not a private community or each other.

    Many jump off the train outraged if they don’t understand how P is developed: by public argument.



    That fits Curts teaching style – the jargon stems from e-prime.

    To avoid God like proclamations often requires pulling in “just the right term”. Then what happens is an operational argument becomes a definition elsewhere (one word or phrase to reference the argument). Overtime a “terms of art” has evolved.

    The main hurdle to P is e-prime. From there definitions. Then, where I’m at, is general knowledge.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 21:03:00 UTC