CHANGING THE JESUS NARRATIVE TO FIT ORIGINAL INTENT
To change the narrative requires only that we say Jesus – as some have hypothesized – is the son of a roman soldier and a jewish prostitute, who rebelled against both roman conquest of Judea and Jewish abuse of one another, with a message of love one another – surrender your frustration, anger, jealousy, to heaven in exchange for building the bond of trust. And for his rebelliousness against both jews and rome, both rome and jews killed him. And then the jews took his message of love and wrapped it in lies, to create a victim hero to replace the greco roman hero Achilles and the Epic Cyle of the aristocracy, and continue the jewish narrative of the underclasses (slaves, slave traders, money changers-usurers instead.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84339750_198464524885042_5102217394399477760_o_198464521551709.jpg “NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”
—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend
(re: doolittle)
….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic
LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…
I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.
So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.
If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.
If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.
But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.
Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.
And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)
So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.”NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”
—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend
(re: doolittle)
….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic
LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…
I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.
So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.
If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.
If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.
But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.
Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.
And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)
So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.
MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT
—“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl
When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do.
Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load).
Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change.
DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity.
There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide.
This is their tradition: gradual colonization and rule, using delay and deceive, while claiming false moral license.
India (population), Russia (technology), will have to stop them. My suspicion is that they will use Pakistan to weaken india, and slowly colonize all siberia.
@QuestionMThings As long as they are colonizing Mongol, Turkic, and Iranic People it is difficult to see them stop. They are also colonizing eastern russia – a territory traditionally in the hands of the Mongoloid (Asian) gene groups. Everything they do is hand-waving while following tradition.
@QuestionMThings As long as they are colonizing Mongol, Turkic, and Iranic People it is difficult to see them stop. They are also colonizing eastern russia – a territory traditionally in the hands of the Mongoloid (Asian) gene groups. Everything they do is hand-waving while following tradition.
Chinese have a long history of racial, cultural, political, and civilizational superiority, and they maintain that racism.They follow Sun Tzu’s strategy of gradually working, and claiming neutral intent, and avoiding violence, until the opposition cannot win. Only war stops them.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
No we just weigh more positives and negatives than you do. Do the research. Conservatives account for everything, and Consumptives use ‘selective accounting’ (cherrypicking). Again: female brain structure.
The solution to left right is no reproduction without production.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84710847_197786154952879_3373725703253000192_o_197786151619546.jpg THE 20th CENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION OF LYING USING THE ABRAHAMIC METHODTHE 20th CENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION OF LYING USING THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD
