Economics of deceit: The cost and time of correcting falsehood cannot be overcome if the consequences of the falsehood can be achieved before correction, or more slowly than can be perceived:
Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism Feminism, Immigration, HBD-Denial.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-13 16:49:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1238507460001968130
Reply addressees: @arnelsmom
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1238502817922535425
Correct. But can’t we use the opportunity for a little intellectually dishonest shaming of the institution just for cathartic reasons? No? Ok. You’re right.
Sigh.
You joy killer.
😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-12 23:46:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1238250033755103232
Reply addressees: @HoarseWisperer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1238185084005552129
That’s because your education intentionally deprived you of a knowledge of economics: a) data from china was not trustworthy b) people over-react and hord. c) the world supply chain (inventory) is limited. d) trade off between shutting down the ability to recover from a shutdown.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-12 14:11:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1238105418452344832
Reply addressees: @ch_as_Carey @Sarahjanecares @YGalanter @charliekirk11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1237907598839603200
You have been lied to. Sorry.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-11 04:27:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1237596089710080001
Reply addressees: @Sarahjanecares @stillmindylou @YGalanter @charliekirk11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1237588180821348352
these shields are all false hoods fabricated during the victorian era. just do your dna, and use the family tree services to discover your lineage.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-09 16:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1237046191029878787
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1237031042600644609
RT @Outsideness: The actual state of sociology. https://www.unz.com/isteve/sociologist-whiteness-is-both-imaginary-and-demands-extermination/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 17:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234893688238727169
Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism? “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
Anti-Abrahamism (ideas) Is Different from Anti Semitism (people) – I’m Not Anti-Anyone Except Parasites (thieves, Murderers) Abrahamism is an ideology, philosophy, and theology of sophism and deceit. Semitism is a language, and a genetic distribution. I’m not anti-semitic. I’m not anti-anyone (although everyone wishes I was). I’m against the use of Abrahamism to undermine host civilizations, and especially ours. And I am pro science and evidence not intuition, what passes for common sense. And the science says something that is undesirable to the left’s intuition, ideology, philosophy, secular, theology, and theology. Small ethnocentric nation states provide markets for the commons suitable to the development of people with different genetic intuitions. And the market results of competition between those nation states will tell us whose intuitions, ideologies philosophies, secular theologies, and theologies are harmful to the people who intuit them. I am, absolutely positively in favor of every current civilization except the semitic. Because every civlization except the semitic has chosen productive, reciprocal, and responsible self evolution without imposition of costs upon others using ideology, philosophy, secular theology, or theology as justification for imposition of costs, undermining, invasion, replacement, consumption, destruction, and reduction to ashes. This century is the one in which the world either contains the Abrahamic ideology, philosophy, theology of deceit, or one in which the world continues to lose civilization to the abrahamic disaster of de-civilization that has destroyed every civlization it has touched. … What is abrahamism? “Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
[I] think it’s either lying (intellectual dishonesty), rallying useful idiots around a lie to obtain power (ideology), or socially constructing a mythology for useful idiots to obtain power (theology). It’s not intellectually coherent enough to be a philosophy, and there is nothing scientific about it. The positive feedback loop for lying to satisfy intellectual dishonesty (self image), ideology (status by offense), theology(status by defense), is intense, which is why it works. It could be that like all the rest of the left he is incapable of producing a solution to prosperous evolution by cooperative competition in market meritocratic eugenics and so his only possible technique to mask the big lie of parasitism, is that I mean, his technique is to:
(a) recite a common falsehood quickly and with authority despite it’s falsehood, and move on. (b) state a falsehood and move on to another before the counter argument can be made, and move on. (c) state a falsification is irrelevant to him, unbelievable, or undesirable, as if approval or preference has any bearing on truth or falsehood. (d) rapidly spew unrelated emotionally satisfying sophisms so that it’s impossible to construct a coherent argument falsifying an argument that isn’t coherent. (e) shouting down or talking over counter arguments, to take advantage of the fact that emotive, incoherent, false, and dishonest arguments are more expensive and time consuming to correct with truth. I’m going to be charitable and assume he’s a genetically predetermined leftist(dysgenic, herd) expressing genetically determined female conflict strategy (undermining undesirable truths), but with male dominance, and male tolerance for disagreement, and is only subtly aware that what he’s saying and how he’s arguing is good enough to achieve his ends. I mean, you can look at him and see that he certainly has low sexual, social, cooperative, political, and military market value, but he definitely demonstrates disagreeableness and dominance expression, on top of the female cognitive strategy of undermining. And that is how females reward dominance expression in other females who engage in conflict on their behalf – with attention and undue praise. I mean, Ryan and Stefan have done their work. I think what I’d like to discover is which of those things he’s doing. But given y’all have asked me to debate him I guess I’m wiling even though it conflicts with my rule of ‘Don’t argue with the cognitively female, they aren’t capable of intellectual honesty so it’s pointless”.
[I] think it’s either lying (intellectual dishonesty), rallying useful idiots around a lie to obtain power (ideology), or socially constructing a mythology for useful idiots to obtain power (theology). It’s not intellectually coherent enough to be a philosophy, and there is nothing scientific about it. The positive feedback loop for lying to satisfy intellectual dishonesty (self image), ideology (status by offense), theology(status by defense), is intense, which is why it works. It could be that like all the rest of the left he is incapable of producing a solution to prosperous evolution by cooperative competition in market meritocratic eugenics and so his only possible technique to mask the big lie of parasitism, is that I mean, his technique is to:
(a) recite a common falsehood quickly and with authority despite it’s falsehood, and move on. (b) state a falsehood and move on to another before the counter argument can be made, and move on. (c) state a falsification is irrelevant to him, unbelievable, or undesirable, as if approval or preference has any bearing on truth or falsehood. (d) rapidly spew unrelated emotionally satisfying sophisms so that it’s impossible to construct a coherent argument falsifying an argument that isn’t coherent. (e) shouting down or talking over counter arguments, to take advantage of the fact that emotive, incoherent, false, and dishonest arguments are more expensive and time consuming to correct with truth. I’m going to be charitable and assume he’s a genetically predetermined leftist(dysgenic, herd) expressing genetically determined female conflict strategy (undermining undesirable truths), but with male dominance, and male tolerance for disagreement, and is only subtly aware that what he’s saying and how he’s arguing is good enough to achieve his ends. I mean, you can look at him and see that he certainly has low sexual, social, cooperative, political, and military market value, but he definitely demonstrates disagreeableness and dominance expression, on top of the female cognitive strategy of undermining. And that is how females reward dominance expression in other females who engage in conflict on their behalf – with attention and undue praise. I mean, Ryan and Stefan have done their work. I think what I’d like to discover is which of those things he’s doing. But given y’all have asked me to debate him I guess I’m wiling even though it conflicts with my rule of ‘Don’t argue with the cognitively female, they aren’t capable of intellectual honesty so it’s pointless”.