Theme: Deception

  • You’re depending on the big lie: that anything is justifiable. It isn’t. Justifi

    You’re depending on the big lie: that anything is justifiable. It isn’t. Justification is a fraud. Decidability is provided by testimony sufficient to meet the demand for infallibility. Science is purely falsificationary. That which is not untestifiable remains a truth candidate.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 18:02:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263168252810846209

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263142178337042435

  • You’re mistaken. It’s a lie if presented as evidence. That’s why its inadmissibl

    You’re mistaken. It’s a lie if presented as evidence. That’s why its inadmissible as evidence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 16:10:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263140064130981889

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263139032114040832

  • Only lies are complicated

    Only lies are complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 16:02:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263138145748627456

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263133474417975299

  • We do not agree on testifiable. Either you can testify to it or you can’t. you c

    We do not agree on testifiable. Either you can testify to it or you can’t. you can’t. You can lie. But you can’t claim it’s testifiable.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 15:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263130963325988866

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263129722973835265

  • The evidence is that in all cases despite trying we cannot find a single instanc

    The evidence is that in all cases despite trying we cannot find a single instance where the individual isn’t lying.

    Means, Motive, Opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 15:26:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263128956682805252

    Reply addressees: @DSchrooner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263114566394884097

  • On Philosophy – Is It All Sophistry?

    A Collection of Posts on Philosophy from An Anti-Philosophy Philosopher. 😉

    . . .

    Q: Curt; Who are your influences?

    [insert page=”curt-who-are-your-influences” display=”content”]

    Q: Curt; What’s the most inspiring philosophical text you’ve read?

    [insert page=”curt-whats-the-most-inspiring-philosophical-text-youve-read” display=”content”]

    Q: No, I don’t have respect for ‘philosophers’

    [insert page=”curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-2043″ display=”content”]

    Q: But yes. There are a few philosophers I’d recommend.

    [insert page=”ok-so-yes-there-are-a-few-philosophers-id-recommend” display=”content”]

    Q: Who is the most influential living philosopher?

    [insert page=”who-is-the-most-influential-living-philosopher” display=”content”]

    Q: Who are the best current right wing (Western) thinkers?

    [insert page=”currently-who-are-the-best-right-wing-philosophers-thinkers-im-a-leftist-and-i-believe-that-its-important-to-challenge-the-beliefs-you-hold-so-im-mostly-looking-for-auth” display=”content”]

    Q: Are there any serious contemporary fascist philosophers (No, other than the chinese communist party)

    [insert page=”are-there-serious-contemporary-fascist-philosophers” display=”content”]

    Q: How do I learn Philosophy?

    [insert page=”q-how-do-i-learn-philosophy” display=”content”]

    Q What’s The Criteria for A Philosopher: What Disambiguates a Philosopher from Philosophizing?

    [insert page=”the-criteria-for-a-philosopher” display=”content”]

    Q: What does a philosopher do?

    [insert page=”what-does-a-philosopher-do” display=”content”]

    Q: Defining Philosophy

    [insert page=”11306″ display=”content”]

    The Functions of a Philosopher

    [insert page=”the-functions-of-a-philosopher” display=”content”]

    The Measure of A Philosopher: Beneficially Novel, Good, Bad(wrong), And Dangerous

    [insert page=”the-measure-of-a-philosopher-beneficially-novel-good-badwrong-and-dangerous” display=”content”]

    We Can Judge the Good and Bad Philosophers

    [insert page=”we-can-now-objectively-and-scientifically-judge-good-philosophers-and-bad-philosophers” display=”content”]

    The 20th Century Philosophers Were Seeking Power, Not Truth

    [insert page=”29th-century-philosophers-were-seeking-power-not-truth” display=”content”]

    Good Philosophers Matter – If you can find one.

    [insert page=”good-philosophers-matter” display=”content”]

    Why Doesn’t Philosophy Get Respect?

    [insert page=”why-doesnt-philosophy-get-respect” display=”content”]

    Philosophy Doesn’t Need a Rebranding, It Needs A Reformation

    [insert page=”nyt-followup-philosophy-needs-more-than-rebranding-it-needs-a-reformation” display=”content”]

    Philosophy Has Been a Catastrophic Failure

    [insert page=”philosophy-has-been-a-catastrophic-failure” display=”content”]

    Should We Kill All The Pseudoscientists and Philosophers and Theologians?

    [insert page=”kill-all-the-pseudoscientists-and-philosophers-theologians” display=”content”]

    The Demarcation Problem is Complete

    [insert page=”the-demarcation-problem-is-complete” display=”content”]

    Metaphysics Is Complete – All else is fictionalism.

    [insert page=”hierarchy-grammars-testimonies-metaphysics-deceits” display=”content”]

    [insert page=”what-is-your-personal-philosophy-as-it-relates-to-ethics-and-metaphysics-why” display=”content”]

    [insert page=”metaphysics-vs-paradigms-the-lesson” display=”content”]

    There Is Only One ‘Philosophy’ If We Speak The Truth. The Rest Is Ignorance, Error, Bias And Lies

    [insert page=”there-is-only-one-philosophy-if-we-speak-the-truth-the-rest-is-ignorance-error-bias-and-lies” display=”content”]

    Why Are So Many Scientists Bashing Philosophers?

    [insert page=”why-are-so-many-scientists-bashing-philosophers” display=”content”]

    The Scientist Is “the One Who Knocks”

    [insert page=”curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-2316″ display=”content”]

    Converting Kantian Rationalism to Scientific Prose

    [insert page=”a-very-very-important-set-of-ideas” display=”content”]

    The End of Justificationary A Priorism

    [insert page=”the-end-of-justificationary-apriorism-vs-critical-empiricism” display=”content”]

    Why Do Rationalists Avoid Testing via the Empirical, Operational, and Reciprocity?

    [insert page=”why-do-rationalists-avoid-testing-via-the-empirical-operational-and-reciprocity” display=”content”]

    Why Did The Philosophers Of Science Only Partly Succeed?

    [insert page=”why-did-the-philosophers-of-science-only-partly-succeed/” display=”content”]

    Continental > Postmodern Philosophy -vs- Analytic > Testimonial Philosophy

    [insert page=”continental-postmodern-philosophy-vs-analytic-testimonial-philosophy” display=”content”]

    The Intellectual Catastrophe Of Specialization And The Cure For It In Education

    [insert page=”the-intellectual-catastrophe-of-specialization-and-the-cure-for-it-in-education” display=”content”]

    . . .

    The Timeline of Philosophy – Five Movements

    [insert page=”the-timeline-of-philosophical-methods” display=”content”]

    The Origins of Philosophy

    [insert page=”10932″ display=”content”]

    Philosophy (Moral Literature) Is Not Much Help

    [insert page=”philosophy-moral-literature-is-not-much-help” display=”content”]

    Moral Language As Attempted Fraud?

    [insert page=”moral-language-as-attempted-fraud” display=”content”]

    Conflation and Deconflation in Argument

    [insert page=”conflation-and-deconflation-in-argument” display=”content”]

    Philosophy vs Sophism

    [insert page=”counsel-philosophy-vs-sophism” display=”content”]

    Sophists Nearly All

    [insert page=”sophists-nearly-all” display=”content”]

    Demand for Preservation of Literary and Religious Mysticism so that we can roll around in our mental playpens

    [insert page=”demand-for-preservation-of-literary-and-religious-mysticism-so-that-we-can-roll-around-in-our-mental-playpens” display=”content”]

    German Philosophy

    [insert page=”german-philosophy” display=”content”]

    Nietzsche’s Morality Isn’t (Nietzche Failed)

    [insert page=”nietzsches-morality-isnt” display=”content”]

    The Error Of The Ancients: War is Fine But Economics Beneath Them

    [insert page=”the-error-of-the-ancients-war-is-fine-but-economics-beneath-them” display=”content”]

    Plato As The Origins Of Evil

    [insert page=”plato-as-the-origins-of-evil” display=”content”]

    Blame Plato’s Philosopher King For The Rise Of Totalitarianism In The Twentieth Century? (No)

    [insert page=”was-karl-popper-right-to-blame-platos-concept-of-the-philosopher-king-for-the-rise-of-totalitarianism-in-the-twentieth-century” display=”content”]

    . . .

    Correcting Aristotle’s Categories of Philosophy

    [insert page=”correcting-aristotles-categories-of-philosophy” display=”content”]

    Translating Between Philosophy and Propertarianism’s Natural Law

    [insert page=”quick-translation-between-philosophy-and-propertarianism-natural-law” display=”content”]

    Q: Curt, is your field (philosophy) art or science

    [insert page=”curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1111″ display=”content”]

    Q: Curt, What is your innovation on popper in epistemology, science, and truth?

    [insert page=”qa-curt-what-is-your-innovation-on-popper-in-epistemology-science-and-truth” display=”content”]

    Q: Testimony – P Is the Expression of Our Ancient Traditions.

    [insert page=”testimony-p-is-the-rational-expression-of-our-ancient-traditions” display=”content”]

    Turns out like this: Hayek is the Philosopher. I’m the Logician.

    [insert page=”hayeks-the-philosopher-its-more-that-im-the-logician-for-him” display=”content”]

    Hayek’s Renunciation Of Conservatism – A Failure Of His Own

    [insert page=”hayeks-renunciation-of-conservatism-a-failure-of-his-own” display=”content”]

    Conservatism Is Not A Longing For The Past – It’s A Capitalization Strategy.

    [insert page=”conservatism-is-not-longing-for-the-past-it-is-a-class-ambition-in-a-division-of-knowledge-and-labor” display=”content”]

    Q: It’s A Function of the Right Place At The Right Time

    [insert page=”its-a-function-of-the-right-place-at-the-right-time” display=”content”]

  • They’ve done it on purpose. With rare exceptions they’ve removed ‘men with chest

    They’ve done it on purpose. With rare exceptions they’ve removed ‘men with chests’ from (((hollywood))) productions.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-13 13:00:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260555436438237191

    Reply addressees: @Matt_S_Stephens

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1260237772708876288

  • You know what Pilpul is? Justification is? Lying is? Cognitive bias is? Stop wha

    You know what Pilpul is? Justification is? Lying is? Cognitive bias is? Stop what? No vehicle? Running in construction boots and cargo shorts? In a neighborhood that has had car and house break-ins? Buy a guy who has a record of theft and weapon arrests?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-10 18:21:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259549091836628992

    Reply addressees: @MattWalshBlog

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259307162293219329

  • West failed because post-world war we let jews come to american and do what they

    West failed because post-world war we let jews come to american and do what they did to rome, to germany, to russia: destroy our truth (propaganda), destroy culture (marxism), destroy our reason (postmodernism) destroy our family (feminism), destroy our military (women and g-ys).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-10 03:07:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259319061860810752

    Reply addressees: @sukimoji

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259318565649481728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @sukimoji China: balance nature. Harmony is honorable. Everything connected. Think in ‘verbs’

    Europe: conquer nature. Competition is honorable. Everything separate. Think in ‘nouns’

    Asking reasons created aristotle, archimedes, epicurus, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1259318565649481728

  • It’s Not an Act. It’s a Method

    IT”S NOT AN ACT. IT”S A METHOD [Y]ou know, people don’t understand the method to the madness. Nothing is random.

    1. Equality was a false promise
    2. An aristocracy of everyone was a false promise.
    3. Aristocracy(Martial limits-via-negativa) > Nobility(Social-Political – choices-via-positiva) > Burgher(Economic practical) > Craftsman (productive, necessary) > Mother(reproductive, promising) > Children(Learning, the proposal) is not a false promise – it’s descriptive: the truth.

    We are not equal, we are interdependent. We earn respect despite our inequality by doing our duty to our interdependence. We maintain that respect and interdependence with loyalty despite our inequality. We demonstrate the obligation of the nobility, the duty of the citizenry, and this is how we work together. We are an army first and a polity second, a society third, bound by the EQUALITY UNDER OUR LAW despite our inequality in ability and value to one another. And that is our secret. Hence the ‘act like aristocracy’. You must be what you wish to become.