Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Libertarians Made Great Useful Idiots

    Oct 23, 2019, 2:57 PM LIBERTARIANS MADE GREAT USEFUL IDIOTS

    —“Patent nonsense. Genetics is the most fundamental element of private property and inheritance.”—Jonathan Besler

    Resource Free of Demonstrated interest. Desired Interest (not property) Demonstrated Interest (not property) Possession (non property) Consensual (reciprocally Insured proto Property Normatively Insured (social Property) Institutionally Insured (political Property) … Political Property: … … Private Property (monopoly of control) … … Private Common Property (unenumerated interest) … … Shareholder Property (enumerated interest) … … Franchised Common Property (unenumerated interest) One can demonstrate interest in children (create and maintain them) One can demonstrate possession of children by force, by convention, by institution) Property – meaning insured, possession, of demonstrated interest – on the other hand, is a consensual, normative, or political category because it is insured by others. If you possess it, and it’s not insured, it’s not property. That’s what property means: that which is insured by other parties. And good luck with rational operational and empirical evidence to the contrary. So you are confusing demonstrated interest with factional possession, and factual insurance, and factual terms of insurance. Which is why libertarianism succeeded the way marxism and abrahamic religion succeeded = by taking advantage of ignorance of people using conflationary terms, to create the presumption of logic where there is none. Libertarians shouldn’t feel too bad about being useful idiots for the enemy. But they were and are. But the authors of libertarianism come from a long tradition of deception by false promise, baiting into hazard, sophism, and critique, ad profiting from doing so. There is only one source of sovereignty and that is the reciprocal insurance of reciprocity by all men capable of bearing arms. Everything else is lying.

  • Those Who Undermined.

    THOSE WHO UNDERMINED.

    —“The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine the compromise between identities, including undermining our families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and they evangelized outright denial we call political correctness to suppress debate. … So, there is no debate to be had. No compromise to be had. There is only peaceful separation between the few treasonous cities, and loyal territories, and the grant of limited legal liberty (self government) to the treasonous cities, or their encirclement, siege, starvation, and internal conflict. 100M is a target number. It’s up to them. Because they don’t have a chance.”–

  • Those Who Undermined.

    THOSE WHO UNDERMINED.

    —“The used Marxism to undermine compromise between the classes, Feminism to undermine compromise between genders, Postmodernism to undermine the compromise between identities, including undermining our families, traditions, eugenics, science, and truth itself – and they evangelized outright denial we call political correctness to suppress debate. … So, there is no debate to be had. No compromise to be had. There is only peaceful separation between the few treasonous cities, and loyal territories, and the grant of limited legal liberty (self government) to the treasonous cities, or their encirclement, siege, starvation, and internal conflict. 100M is a target number. It’s up to them. Because they don’t have a chance.”–

  • “GSRRM” Response

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.

  • “GSRRM” Response

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.

  • Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – larg

    Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – largely of virtue signals.

  • Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – larg

    Progressivism = lying and undermining for the purpose of hyperconsumption – largely of virtue signals.

  • Operationalizing an Argument for The Preservation of Malinvestment in Priors

    OPERATIONALIZING AN ARGUMENT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MALINVESTMENT IN PRIORS (example of faith or other desirable false beliefs)

    —“My solution is values testing. Which turns out to be epistemology testing. Meaning being downstream from epistemology, and values are downstream from meaning. The semiotic link between concept, word and thing cannot be broken in empiricism. Redefinition of terms that you see in certain critiques doesn’t negate the original concept; rather it creates a void to be filled by a new word, or rejection of the modified definition. Test for empiricism. “— Andrew M Gilmour

    I am sure that makes some sort of sense to you but I can’t translate it into truthful speech. So lets operationalize it and see what happens: “My solution to (some problem or other) consists in testing (some kind of, category of, some individual or group’s) values. Truthful statements require knowledge individuals don’t possess, cannot obtain, cannot ford to obtain, or are unwilling to obtain, so they substitute (whatever set of constant relations between senses, associations with objects, contexts, locations, and valued returns) is within their memories (experience and therefore meaning). The individual’s association between the constant relations produced by some mark, display, word or action, and cumulative prior associations currently in memory (concept), are not falsified or replaced or informed by evidence (experience) accumulated using physical and logical instrumentation we use to test our sense perception, free association, and reason, and to falsify, confirm, or evolve those same associations (categories). The use of Operational Language, wherein each sequential action whether physical, rational, or logical, is subjectively testable, does nothing to reorganize collections of constant relations (concepts), and the paradigms upon which those prior and new associations depend by the same means of cumulative associations. Instead (some individual, some people, some group) will always attempt to defend the newly falsified, confirmed, revised topic so that it remains unchanged, and instead, (whomever) will seek to preserve (whomever’s) investment in existing paradigms (constant relations, theories, narratives), by finding and fitting a new set of constant relations, and name them, into his previous paradigms, rather than reform his paradigms. This is because (some reason or other) people do not want to learn but preserve their paradigms regardless of how completely they are falsified. The reason is that for some reason, some percentage of the population seeks the psychological comfort of some paradigm over the more parsimonious (truthful) paradigm.” Well, you just described the reason for choosing not to learn because of the addiction to faith, or not learning because of addiction to some other means of preserving psychological self image or social status or pretense of sexual, social, economic, political, military market value, that is counter to competitive reality. When under all but physically developmental illnesses, cognitive behavioral therapy under care can correct every known one of them. I also agree that this is the definition of mental illness. And I also agree this is the dominant position of the excessively empathic (feminine) mind when in a condition of vulnerability.)

  • Operationalizing an Argument for The Preservation of Malinvestment in Priors

    OPERATIONALIZING AN ARGUMENT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MALINVESTMENT IN PRIORS (example of faith or other desirable false beliefs)

    —“My solution is values testing. Which turns out to be epistemology testing. Meaning being downstream from epistemology, and values are downstream from meaning. The semiotic link between concept, word and thing cannot be broken in empiricism. Redefinition of terms that you see in certain critiques doesn’t negate the original concept; rather it creates a void to be filled by a new word, or rejection of the modified definition. Test for empiricism. “— Andrew M Gilmour

    I am sure that makes some sort of sense to you but I can’t translate it into truthful speech. So lets operationalize it and see what happens: “My solution to (some problem or other) consists in testing (some kind of, category of, some individual or group’s) values. Truthful statements require knowledge individuals don’t possess, cannot obtain, cannot ford to obtain, or are unwilling to obtain, so they substitute (whatever set of constant relations between senses, associations with objects, contexts, locations, and valued returns) is within their memories (experience and therefore meaning). The individual’s association between the constant relations produced by some mark, display, word or action, and cumulative prior associations currently in memory (concept), are not falsified or replaced or informed by evidence (experience) accumulated using physical and logical instrumentation we use to test our sense perception, free association, and reason, and to falsify, confirm, or evolve those same associations (categories). The use of Operational Language, wherein each sequential action whether physical, rational, or logical, is subjectively testable, does nothing to reorganize collections of constant relations (concepts), and the paradigms upon which those prior and new associations depend by the same means of cumulative associations. Instead (some individual, some people, some group) will always attempt to defend the newly falsified, confirmed, revised topic so that it remains unchanged, and instead, (whomever) will seek to preserve (whomever’s) investment in existing paradigms (constant relations, theories, narratives), by finding and fitting a new set of constant relations, and name them, into his previous paradigms, rather than reform his paradigms. This is because (some reason or other) people do not want to learn but preserve their paradigms regardless of how completely they are falsified. The reason is that for some reason, some percentage of the population seeks the psychological comfort of some paradigm over the more parsimonious (truthful) paradigm.” Well, you just described the reason for choosing not to learn because of the addiction to faith, or not learning because of addiction to some other means of preserving psychological self image or social status or pretense of sexual, social, economic, political, military market value, that is counter to competitive reality. When under all but physically developmental illnesses, cognitive behavioral therapy under care can correct every known one of them. I also agree that this is the definition of mental illness. And I also agree this is the dominant position of the excessively empathic (feminine) mind when in a condition of vulnerability.)

  • Let the normal cycle take its course. Do not get wrapped up in this. All that’s

    Let the normal cycle take its course. Do not get wrapped up in this. All that’s happening is $oros is using the opportunity to try to influence the election, while people are home, out of work, and exhausted by the virus.Their anger is legit.
    The underlying stress is still there.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 14:19:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267460816053456898

    Reply addressees: @RumorDr @essential_1492

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267457725375512577