Theme: Deception

  • SEYMOUR HERSH’S REPUTATION FOR CLICKBAIT AND MEDIABAIT WITH CONSPIRACY THEORIES:

    SEYMOUR HERSH’S REPUTATION FOR CLICKBAIT AND MEDIABAIT WITH CONSPIRACY THEORIES: SPECULATION NOT REPORTING
    Seymour Hersh’s investigative methods and reporting style have drawn significant skepticism and criticism for several specific reasons:

    Anonymous Sources: Hersh’s dependence on anonymous sources complicates the verification process, casting doubt on the reliability of his reporting. This reliance often puts the burden of trust entirely on his personal credibility rather than transparent evidence.

    Controversial Claims: He frequently presents claims that challenge official narratives, such as his account of the Osama bin Laden raid. These claims, often unsupported by publicly verifiable evidence, position his reports closer to speculation, impacting his reputation for factual accuracy.

    Institutional Backlash: Hersh’s focus on sensitive national security topics brings him into frequent conflict with U.S. government and military institutions. This has not only polarized opinion about his work but has also led to public disputes that question his interpretations and findings.

    Criticism from Peers: Within the journalism community, Hersh faces criticism for practices that some argue breach journalistic ethics—specifically his speculative approach and opaque sourcing. This criticism undermines his standing among contemporaries who advocate for more rigorous standards.

    Outdated Methods: The shift in journalism towards more accountability and transparency in sourcing and reporting contrasts sharply with Hersh’s traditional, less transparent methods. This discrepancy has made his work seem out of step with current journalistic standards, further inviting critique.

    These factors collectively explain why Seymour Hersh’s work, despite its impact, invites skepticism and critique, affecting his credibility and the acceptance of his findings in the broader discourse on investigative journalism.

    In other worse Hersh produces nonsense clickbait. 😉

    Reply addressees: @AltPublishNow @RealPatrickWebb


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 16:00:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782077032626618368

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782066706971836782

  • RPW: Hersh is a notorious fictionalist and this is his most recent fiction

    RPW: Hersh is a notorious fictionalist and this is his most recent fiction.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 14:25:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782053094165037088

    Reply addressees: @RealPatrickWebb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781854127514845263

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @ricwe123 It’s SEYMOUR HERSH. I mean, how many media-bait and

    RT @curtdoolittle: @ricwe123 It’s SEYMOUR HERSH. I mean, how many media-bait and clickbait fictions does this psychopath need to author bef…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 14:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782052882419778019

  • It’s SEYMOUR HERSH. I mean, how many media-bait and clickbait fictions does this

    It’s SEYMOUR HERSH. I mean, how many media-bait and clickbait fictions does this psychopath need to author before the nitwittery ignores his nonsense for what it is?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 14:24:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782052856587026869

    Reply addressees: @ricwe123

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781852355530457460

  • This is a useless discussion, because it consists of (a) Matt trying to excuse h

    This is a useless discussion, because it consists of (a) Matt trying to excuse his engagement farming (b) people politicizing engagement farming when it’s largely a problem of sex, bitcoin, financial scams, trolling and memes.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-19 22:13:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781446173024526748

    Reply addressees: @AlexFinnX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781412432671379869

  • THE CHURCH WAS PROFOUNDLY CORRUPT – AS ARE ALL GOVERNING INSTITUTIONS, BUT THE T

    THE CHURCH WAS PROFOUNDLY CORRUPT – AS ARE ALL GOVERNING INSTITUTIONS, BUT THE THINKERS WERE LARGELY RIGHT – AT LEAST METAPHORICALLY

    The church, as vastly corrupt as it was, on a scale we cannot imagine today, where the priesthood was often illiterate and just ‘made it up’, did produce an attempt to marry the aristocratic philosophy of europeans and their conquest and domestication of man and nature, with the underclass religion of the Semites, and their presumption of human evil, and need for authoritarian regulation if they were to integrate into the modernity that the greco-roman civilization had brought about.

    So the germanized christianity that resulted in Europe was a combination of platonic ‘elite’ authority and fictionalism (pretense of knowledge) in his idealism (forms), and semitic authoritarian

    While Aristotle and his peers sought to domesticate animal man (the underclasses) into the aristocratic tradition of responsibility and agency thus preserving the distributed dictatorship of equals, plato, like the the semites, sought to rule over the peasantry in the presumption that they would remain but domesticated animals (women and children) and never evolve into men (aristocracy) and responsibility.

    Thus we found Augustine and eventually Aquinas who tried to synthesize the semitic, platonic, and aristotelian-epicurean-stoic systems of thought eventually outputting the natural law, which, of course, varies very little from the traditional law of europeans, the common law of rome, germania, and eventually the common law of england, and finally the natural law of Blackstone and the american constitution.

    The Protestants
    The protestants however, in an effort to escape the corruption of the church, and the corruption fo the alliance between church and state, adopted a textual fundamentalism – theological anarchism so to speak.

    The phrase “Sola Scriptura” is a Latin term that means “by Scripture alone.” It is one of the five “solas” (Latin for “alone”) that emerged during the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century.

    The five solas are:
    1. Sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone)
    2. Sola Fide (by faith alone)
    3. Sola Gratia (by grace alone)
    4. Solus Christus (Christ alone)
    5. Soli Deo Gloria (glory to God alone)

    Sola Scriptura is a theological doctrine that holds that the Bible is the supreme authority in all matters of doctrine and practice. It asserts that the Bible, as the inspired Word of God, is the only infallible rule of faith and practice, and that it alone is sufficient for understanding God’s will and for living a Christian life.

    This doctrine emphasizes that the Bible contains all knowledge necessary for salvation and holiness, and that it is the final authority for the church. It rejects the idea that sacred tradition, religious institutions, or individual leaders have authority equal to or above that of the Bible.

    Sola Scriptura was a central tenet of the Protestant Reformation, as reformers such as Martin Luther and John Calvin sought to challenge the authority of the Roman Catholic Church and its reliance on tradition and papal authority. They argued that the Bible, not the church, was the ultimate authority for Christians.

    While Sola Scriptura is a foundational belief in many Protestant denominations, it is not accepted by the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches, which hold that the Bible must be interpreted within the context of sacred tradition and the teachings of the church.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-19 21:27:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1781430019782250496

  • Note the use of —“we can imply”– meaning “we can justify” meaning “we can mak

    Note the use of —“we can imply”– meaning “we can justify” meaning “we can make up the excuse”. 😉

    I work with testimonial truth. Not justification. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 22:29:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780000457315782717

    Reply addressees: @FrancoKurte @MindEnjoyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779992967433895996

  • that’s an idiosyncratic association totally out of left field, in the range of h

    that’s an idiosyncratic association totally out of left field, in the range of hallucinogenics, that must give insight into your psychology a bit .. lol 😉 -cheers

    Do you share your drug of choice? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 18:59:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779947624365187541

    Reply addressees: @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779946368385097969

  • “No More Lies”

    “No More Lies”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-11 14:14:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778426279940808928

    Reply addressees: @vvphilo @RokoMijic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778425842789494786

  • AVOIDING CENSORSHIP: MAINTAIN CIVILITY Let me educate y’all a bit on the decisio

    AVOIDING CENSORSHIP: MAINTAIN CIVILITY
    Let me educate y’all a bit on the decision criteria for censorship of public speech – it’s mostly manners. If you don’t have manners, then you have no place in public speech.
    1) Decorum: Keep the language civil. (Emotional Loading) Do not violate “Decorum”, by using curses, slurs, or other emotionally loaded aggressions.”
    2) Content: Keep the content civil: Avoid the criminal, illegal, sexually explicit, brutal, grotesque, and shocking.
    3) Position/Viewpoint: Keep the Position Civil: Speak the truth as you understand it, and if possible explain rational incentives, failure to understand them, and whether or not the behavior is transparent and reciprocal.
    Don’t engage in “gossiping, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, ridiculing, rallying, undermining, rolling accusation, doxxing, canceling”
    Most of the time differences are an extension of sex differences, escalated by class, culture, nation, and race differences in moral PREFERENCE – all of which are reducible to sex differences (feminine vs masculine) instincts.
    The solution to our moral differences is trade, because all moral settlements like all political settlements consist of compromises.
    Grow up.
    Suppress heated emotion.
    Respond with civil Reason.
    If the government seeks to do otherwise they must be overthrown and replaced.
    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @yankees_28th @elonmusk


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-09 18:43:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777769208857694208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777695431335502217