I do, and we need to, compensate for the De-Education of the public, by the denial of reality, by the generations of Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, HBD-Denialism – that have cast European civilization as oppressors rather than gradual domesticators of ape-animals. https://t.co/wFoKjmMeau
Theme: Deception
-
I do, and we need to, compensate for the De-Education of the public, by the deni
I do, and we need to, compensate for the De-Education of the public, by the denial of reality, by the generations of Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, HBD-Denialism – that have cast European civilization as oppressors rather than gradual domesticators of ape-animals. https://t.co/wFoKjmMeau
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-29 16:02:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288505136709591044
-
Of course it does. Because they all used the Jewish group strategy(female intuit
Of course it does. Because they all used the Jewish group strategy(female intuition to undermine) and method of deception(Abrahamic sophistry by baiting into hazard) – that was as much an advancement in the art of lying as Aristotelian was in the truth,or Confucius was in wisdom.
Reply addressees: @adinhaykin @nathancofnas -
Of course it does. Because they all used the Jewish group strategy(female intuit
Of course it does. Because they all used the Jewish group strategy(female intuition to undermine) and method of deception(Abrahamic sophistry by baiting into hazard) – that was as much an advancement in the art of lying as Aristotelian was in the truth,or Confucius was in wisdom.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 14:21:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288117439721398273
Reply addressees: @adinhaykin @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288106527824310272
-
Please, you and your Social Justice harpies, STAY GONE from social media. 😉 It
Please, you and your Social Justice harpies, STAY GONE from social media. 😉 It was fine for Jewish communists, socialists, postmodernists, anti-male feminists, and HBD-denialists to demand free speech, but not for us to argue against them?
Where is the ‘reciprocity’, two-faced?
Reply addressees: @KathyBurke -
Please, you and your Social Justice harpies, STAY GONE from social media. 😉 It
Please, you and your Social Justice harpies, STAY GONE from social media. 😉 It was fine for Jewish communists, socialists, postmodernists, anti-male feminists, and HBD-denialists to demand free speech, but not for us to argue against them?
Where is the ‘reciprocity’, two-faced?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:57:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287749061852962817
Reply addressees: @KathyBurke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287643917710757888
-
There is a reason there is no advanced literature of libertarianism and that eve
There is a reason there is no advanced literature of libertarianism and that every book is an introduction.
Because it’s shallow.
Stop with the young adult literature.
Learn Rule of Law of Natural Law and Economics
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:44:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287745666610069505
Reply addressees: @billtalts @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287626114416902146
-
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law,
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:40:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287744556281331712
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905
-
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law,
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski -
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestio
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:29:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287741891761573888
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905