The Three Great Postwar Pseudoscientific Lies of the Left: promise of violation of Physical(scarcity), Natural(reciprocity), Evolutionary(regression to the mean) Laws: The false promises of 1-Endless growth, 2-the naure of man, and 3-the malleability of man.
The second dark age.
Reply addressees: @MinorityOfOne75 @jbossy56 @IonaItalia @charlesmurray
Theme: Deception
-
The Three Great Postwar Pseudoscientific Lies of the Left: promise of violation
-
The Three Great Postwar Pseudoscientific Lies of the Left: promise of violation
The Three Great Postwar Pseudoscientific Lies of the Left: promise of violation of Physical(scarcity), Natural(reciprocity), Evolutionary(regression to the mean) Laws: The false promises of 1-Endless growth, 2-the naure of man, and 3-the malleability of man.
The second dark age.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-15 22:30:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294763427475460096
Reply addressees: @MinorityOfOne75 @jbossy56 @IonaItalia @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294762195872620545
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MinorityOfOne75 @jbossy56 @IonaItalia @charlesmurray The races demonstrate extraordinary diversity in ability that we understand is not environmental – especially between East Asians (+math), Europeans (balanced), and Ashkenazim (+verbal). Empathy is not evidence. The evidence is we don’t differ from all other domesticated animals.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1294762195872620545
-
(Statements, propositions, and arguments are either false, sufficiently true, or
(Statements, propositions, and arguments are either false, sufficiently true, or undecidable. Motives only assist us in identifying the cause of falsehood and deceit. Equating motive, or agreeableness with falsehood is one of the most common of postwar public deceits.)
Reply addressees: @MinorityOfOne75 @IonaItalia @charlesmurray -
(Statements, propositions, and arguments are either false, sufficiently true, or
(Statements, propositions, and arguments are either false, sufficiently true, or undecidable. Motives only assist us in identifying the cause of falsehood and deceit. Equating motive, or agreeableness with falsehood is one of the most common of postwar public deceits.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-15 21:53:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294754072856342533
Reply addressees: @MinorityOfOne75 @IonaItalia @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1294092713130942465
-
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity t
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity to her group. What they do is consistent regardless of what they say. AFAIK current relationship issues are due to desocialization of males and insulation of females from male adversarialism.
Reply addressees: @Zen_niks @DegenRolf -
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity t
Watch what women do not what they say. What they say merely signals conformity to her group. What they do is consistent regardless of what they say. AFAIK current relationship issues are due to desocialization of males and insulation of females from male adversarialism.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 22:05:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292945089371746304
Reply addressees: @Zen_niks @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292933086745726976
-
“Cobbling together a pseudo-argument by references to papers, as a false pretens
“Cobbling together a pseudo-argument by references to papers, as a false pretense of legitimacy by association.”
Claims a theory. Never presents one. Instead, presents a loose association of cites that records his present level of understanding. (thin)
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron -
“Cobbling together a pseudo-argument by references to papers, as a false pretens
“Cobbling together a pseudo-argument by references to papers, as a false pretense of legitimacy by association.”
Claims a theory. Never presents one. Instead, presents a loose association of cites that records his present level of understanding. (thin)
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:57:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292822282948222976
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292810022762807297
-
FYI: I was asked to comment on this paper b/c it’s an area of my work. And the a
FYI: I was asked to comment on this paper b/c it’s an area of my work. And the author blocked me for this thread. But just as physics is supporting a vast population of pseudoscientists, so is almost every other area of the academy other than applied math, compsci, and biochem.
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron -
FYI: I was asked to comment on this paper b/c it’s an area of my work. And the a
FYI: I was asked to comment on this paper b/c it’s an area of my work. And the author blocked me for this thread. But just as physics is supporting a vast population of pseudoscientists, so is almost every other area of the academy other than applied math, compsci, and biochem.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:40:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818001180467202
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292815400812650496
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bierlingm @adamsafron To understand the operational function of the brain it’s better to follow Jeff Hawkins, and Joscha Bach, etc. and the research they cite. Computational and economic(real) thought is a profound improvement over mathematics and physics(ideal) b/c accounts for causality and time.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292815400812650496