Can you warranty that promise? No.
What’s the difference between the false promise of life after death, the false promise of freedom from economic markets( marxism), the false promise of freedom from sex or class differences (HBD-denial) or from reason (postmodernism?) .. None.
Reply addressees: @harrisonpartch @chico_wales
Theme: Deception
-
Can you warranty that promise? No. What’s the difference between the false promi
-
I mean, do you want to live in a post 1960 world of the Jewish elites who false-
I mean, do you want to live in a post 1960 world of the Jewish elites who false-promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws if you replace whites? Or to live in pre-’60 world of the anglo saxon elites that dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty?
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-16 15:41:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1306256936506187783
-
I mean, do you want to live in a post 1960 world of the Jewish elites who false-
I mean, do you want to live in a post 1960 world of the Jewish elites who false-promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws if you replace whites? Or to live in pre-’60 world of the anglo saxon elites that dragged mankind out of ignorance and poverty?
-
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democ
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 19:17:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305586585082179584
Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305572523455787008
-
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democ
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.
Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman -
In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories o
In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies. 1-The myth of oppression; 2-the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and 3-pseudoscientific econ evades full accounting of all changes in capital.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 19:15:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305586047867387907
Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305572523455787008
-
In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories o
In Paul Krugman’s case he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies. 1-The myth of oppression; 2-the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and 3-pseudoscientific econ evades full accounting of all changes in capital.
Reply addressees: @bill_m_to @paulkrugman -
Paul: It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-i
Paul: It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-into-hazard, using false-promise of circumvention of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by sophistry and Social Construction, and the lie that Aristocracy oppressed rather than domesticated man.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 17:49:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305564382261391360
Reply addressees: @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1305561698049429509
-
Paul: It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-i
Paul: It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-into-hazard, using false-promise of circumvention of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by sophistry and Social Construction, and the lie that Aristocracy oppressed rather than domesticated man.
Reply addressees: @paulkrugman -
TRANSLATING A CRITICISM OF PAUL KRUGMAN —“can you translate that into dumbf_ck
TRANSLATING A CRITICISM OF PAUL KRUGMAN
—“can you translate that into dumbf_ckistanian?”— a Tweeter
Paul tells sophisticated lies that make people believe they can escape a harsh reality. Contrary to traditional European modes of thinking such as testimonial speech.
European man institutionalized court testimony as the normative mode of speech. It’s the most expensive normative construction in human history. The technique (pilpul) that Paul practices is the opposite. Most fascinating subject in history: The art of institutionalizing lying.
In Paul Krugman’s case, he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies.
… 1-The myth of oppression;
… 2-The false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and;
… 3-His pseudoscientific econ that evades full accounting of all changes in capital.
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.
We know how that worked out everywhere else. The Christian and Muslim expansion resulted in over a thousand years of dark age, destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to a uniform totalitarianism, ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia from which they appear unable to escape.
The programs of pseudoscience (boaz, freud, gould,) marxism, socialism, and sophistry (the frankfurt school), and social construction (deceit) via postmodernism, hostile-feminism, and human biodiversity denialism all seek to reverse the restoration of Aristotelianism, the restoration of european ism, and the continuation of the european political tradition of rule of law.
I mean, the Marxists and socialists are only responsible for 100M dead. The feminists are only responsible for the reproductive depopulation of Europeans. The postmodernists are only responsible for destroying truthful speech. The denialists are only responsible for destroying psychology, sociology, politics, and economics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-14 15:29:00 UTC