Neo liberal is a term for the center left and left to use to criticize the recognition of the failure of the marxist and progressive economic theories that were predicated on false assumptions of human nature. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 17:53:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799137569575489823
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799129448870191313
Greed is only an incentive. What matters is the actions and consequences. Our laws didn’t keep pace with innovations in fraud and deception. That’s fixable.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 17:15:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799128166889562307
Reply addressees: @DylanGTech @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798823868108616174
RT @a43767796: @willchamberlain I’m a former journalist. I could see the suicide of the media in the 90s as the old-time Mike Roykos were p…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 05:08:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798945095343071408
Sigh.. I’ve been doing this a very long time. It’s called king of the hill games. You post a position that can be interpreted ambiguously that provokes moral responses in order to determine the behavior of the respondents. This is one of the advantages social media has provided those of us who work research, in that we can overcome the problem of reported behavior by collecting demonstrated behavior.
Much of my research on lying, and in particular sex differences in lying was accomplished by this same method. In fact, your response is an instinctual one that is stereotypical for. your sex age and background.
You may not know this but we need as little as a few hundred words to profile you. Some social media sites can do so with as little as one hundred clicks.
This post follows a theme which I am currently exploring which is the individual’s experience with organizational scale, moral bias, virtue signal seeking, and the intersection with feminine oppression and masculine conspiracy expressions.
My primary concern is learning how to overcome the tendency of males to anchor on something systematic just as much as females anchor on something self righteous – both of which are shallow attempts to construct self image and status amidst the inability to produce material results in life by means only possible with greater demonstrated responsibility for other than themselves.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @thegartsy @TabbyTeamster @EireAcc @NatLawInstitute
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 04:19:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798932767301947392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798929972381593992
–“Among Gen-Z, everyone behaves as if Stalin has the room bugged.”–
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 01:44:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798893778771869879
It’s nonsense. And those videos are beyond nonsense. They’re fun. They’re a mythology. But it’s total nonsense.
OUT OF AFRICA AND BACK AND FORTH
There was back and forth gene flow. There was back and forth gene flow between previous generations of man. But the what’s called ‘the whole kit’ emerged in east africa, spread across into then-green saudi peninsula, but settled in the then-dry persian gulf and it’s many rivers and marshes – the optimum ground for mankind. And then spread out following the coastal route. Because once you have fishing you’re never going to starve. Conversely, if you migrate for large game up the rivers whether the Tigris and Euphrates or the Indus, you will find game that has no experience with humans and the returns on that game, especially given the furs, skins, and bones, were better than those of the fish in the sea. So yes there has always been back and forth gene flow, and yes some of the backward gene flow was contributory because it’s easier to isolate and speciate outside of africa than in it – if you have the ‘full kit’ of technologies necessary to survive in numbers outside of africa.
Reply addressees: @tbaker818
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:36:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798861534804029440
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798857365556802009
More correctly brad helped me understand how to get through to you two. 😉
You see, I see the world as incentives. And I ignore what people say as nothing more than misdirecting, obscuring, excusing or advocating their incentives.
For some reason it’s extremely difficult to get across the complexity of influences that produce such things as the world wars and the solutions proposed after them. So in my view you attribute too much to the negative influences that brought about the condition and I attribute too much to the positive ambitions as a consequence of of the wars. So if you want to draw attention to the bad actors – especially the financial sector and ‘the enemy’s stated goal of ending the monarchies’, I have no problem with that. On the other hand you’d need to recognize that there were moral men with moral ambitions that precisely because they were anglo-scotts-dutch-german protestant moralists, believe they were doing the best thing for mankind – and they were and it worked. If they had other ambitions Patton could have destroyed russia and macarthur china and we would have an even better world fully transformed out of the age of empires.
That they were duped into fighting the wrong enemy. That they were naive in understanding the internal and external enemy. That they were naive in believing the nature of man would reject the false promises of the enemy. That they failed to purge them in the McCarthy era. That they failed to sop them in the sixties. That they continue to fail to stop them – is still a matter of that damned protestant evangelical optimism and nw European heroism, white man’s burden, and aristocratic mercy is not the same as that they were and still are conspiratorial. Just the opposite.
And this is exactly what the Russian elites think, and why they call us fools. And its why muslim immigrants refer to europeans as easy ‘victims’. It’s why the jews continue to take advantage of americans – which Bebe has said not so directly but repeatedly. Our morals are both our internal asset and our external risk.
The smithians were correct. But only if one understands that we europeans domesticated warfare, But the rest of the world still practices TOTAL WAR.
Which is what I am trying to get across, and somehow for some reason, Luke is opposing that and … well, it caused me to say ‘Ok, I’ve had enough of fighting this team’ for a while and maybe it’s time I just gave up on trying.
So, you know, I don’t know why this is so hard for y’all to get but brad tried to explain both of your positions to me and he says I’m creating the wrong impression and I think I’m trying to counter a failure to recognize the moral ambitions and the success of those ambitions despite the naivety that both provides those ambitions and allows their undermining.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 23:26:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798858999934181376
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798845052959277407
THE TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY WIN
–“You’ve been lied to since 1939. As general Patton said, we fought for the wrong side. The Germans were not the bad guys, we had no reason to go after Germany other than helping the British, who supported the polish in their misbehavior against the germans in Silesia killing 50,000 Germans prior to the war. And even then, the British, who had offers of peace and refused them. We should have stayed out of it. But instead we destroyed the capacity of Germany to keep the east at bay. We destroyed the British empires, failed to destroy the chines and Russian communist empires, brought about the American empires by default, and the same people that destroyed Russia and Germany are destroying the americans by the same means.”– f
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 21:44:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798833475530690560
RE: NONSENSE TODAY
I am a ‘tech guy’. I have built one of the largest privately held tech consultancies in the USA. I have done work for DOD, Justice, and Intel. I have prosecuted people for racketeering. I have prosecuted people using drive images. There is zero chance that a drive image has been altered that it is not easily detectable. If it was it would require money and one of the best groups in the world to hide it, and it would still be very likely we’d be able to detect it simply by statistical analysis of the distribution of fragments of data.
That said, it’s irrelevant.
The point here is that Trump and his people are being politically prosecuted with unequal application of the law.
If not Clinton who paid hush money while president, and banged a staffer in the oval office and lied about it would have been prosecuted.
Of the number of people prosecuted under the same misdemeanor in NY is rare and the average fine is on the order of eighty dollars.
Bannon is no different. The more money you have the more complex your organization the more interactions that you have the more ‘trouble’ that accumulates around you. I have sent my entire email archive and drives to multiple court cases, and the only thing they have ever found in my career is I was too optimistic that I could recover a company I rescued from bankruptcy by buying it. Lawsuits, and in particular, clerical nonsense, are part of life for anyone with any money of any scale. And trump unfortunately deals with the most corrupt groups in the world: finance, government bureaucrats, unions, and trade workers.
There is far more malfeasance of high crimes in the democratic arena. There is far more conspiracy among the Bidens on a global sale, the Clintons and the Obamas and the Pelosis and the DNC that occurs with any set of republicans and we know why this is the case and it’s just a vast difference in ambitions and morals.
People will justify their priors.
That’s because they have different morals.
The difference between right and male, left and female, is consistent everywhere at all times: the feminine, left use of special pleading, victim claiming, projection, rolling accusation, to hide behind a pretense of innocence, what is always and everywhere criminality by undermining canceling sedition and social construction of falsehoods. Why? Because the masculine right demands responsibility and the feminine left seeks to evade it – just as women never admit they’re wrong.
The left is no longer the result of new ninetieth and early twentieth England christian protestant virtue signaling women, but he adoption of the abrahamic and marxist method of sedition industrialized and professionalized by soviet research and development as a means of destroying western civilization by ‘a march through the institutions of cultural production’.
And the cause of the destruction of the middle class is the left just as the left is the cause of the destruction of the black family and the black progress into integration.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @DiligentDenizen
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-06 20:09:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798809578924388352
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798771069521940746
RT @NoahRevoy: @WerrellBradley @curtdoolittle They use systematized manipulation (GSRRM) on an industrial scale.
If only someone wrote a b…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-05 19:18:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798434202607845382