Theme: Deception

  • Whether or not the Left gets away with their voter fraud in court, says nothing

    Whether or not the Left gets away with their voter fraud in court, says nothing about the fact that the data says without question that the data is fraudulent. Math is relatively clear in this matter. Voter understanding of them is not. Court willingness to explain this? Dunno. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1332822544815099905

  • It’s not thinking. It’s just math. We won. The question is whether you and yours

    It’s not thinking. It’s just math. We won. The question is whether you and yours are better crooks given the time frame or whether we can produce enough evidence for the court to take the big step of acting in this matter. Hence lower courts dismissing and passing to supremes.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-28 23:03:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332822544815099905

    Reply addressees: @dennisdaley1 @MediaSpurt @nytimes @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332821803119632384

  • (a) We won today. (b) You have a long record of voter fraud, vote buying, and po

    (a) We won today. (b) You have a long record of voter fraud, vote buying, and political corruption, becuase you cannot compete meritocratically in markets or with your ideas. (c) a biden win is statistically impossible (d) our goal is to ‘out’ you criminals more than to win.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-28 22:56:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332820810504007685

    Reply addressees: @dennisdaley1 @MediaSpurt @nytimes @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332792665470103561

  • That data just can’t be true. Just not possible. We would have seen outliers eve

    That data just can’t be true. Just not possible. We would have seen outliers everywhere but we only see them in the data dumps in the night. That’s impossible.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-28 17:59:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332746067545378817

    Reply addressees: @hpcel45

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332745157112893443

  • The Choice – Episode 0033 – The Prosecution. What Is To Be Done?

    How Can We End Abrahamic Deceit Forever?

    Restore our requirement that all public speech, to the public, in matters public be limited to testimony.  Really. That’s it. It’s quite simple. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information. Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true. How? Involuntary Warranty of Tests of Due Diligence 1 – Categorical consistency 2 – Logical consistency 3 – Empirical consistency 4 – Operational consistency 5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor) 6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity) 7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.) 8 – Full accounting of content and consequence within those limits. While this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice. And all the culture along with it. And all of mankind as a consequence. End the invention of lying.

    The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    Truth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural PeoplesWe Must Rule, if Not for The Sake of All Mankind, but Out of Self Defense.

    No More Books Of Lies

    The Vedas were invented to control The Avesta invented to divide The Talmud invented to deceive. The Bible invented to enslave. The Koran invented to conquer. Das Capital to steal. The General Theory to Impoverish. The Truth to set us free. NO MORE LIES.

    What is to be done?

    I operate under these presumptions (women, Jews, the success of institutions and law), and that man can be heroic in his reproductive sacrifices, and that we must separate and let the left create a record in history that is undeniable: that they will self destruct but they cannot take the only moral working class in the world down with them.  Instead, they make take all their kind down with them and in doing so, achieve greater evolution of man by the culling of the dysfunctional, than the european project has been able to achieve with its five ages of evolutions:

    • The indo-european expansion of aristocratic egalitarianism,
    • The Mediterranean expansion of the Greco Romans,
    • The continual continental expansion of the Germanics,
    • And the worldwide expansion of the Atlantic Europeans during the age of sail,
    • And culminating in the european postwar attempt to civilize the globe – at a profit of course.

    In fact, the only thing that stopped the european transformation of man was Judaism-Christianity-Islam in the ancient world and marxism-neo-marxism-postmodernism in the modern world’s beginning of the current dark age. No More Lies The Truth made the west: the incremental evolution of testimony according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. It is the most costly commons a people can develop – no one else has. And with that truth comes another uncomfortable truth: Man evolved as a self domesticating animal. First by neoteny, second socially, third institutionally, fourth technologically, and fifth scientifically. So No More Lies For those that are too vulgar for high culture, too vulgar for safe, beautiful, high trust commons, too vulgar for dedication to family and society, too vulgar for control of animal impulse, to vulgar to save for the future, then you are welcome to go your own way and pay the costs of doing so. For those of us that desire high culture, a homogenous polity, low power distance, elegant commons, low crime, safe streets, and a political order devoted to the family, friends, commercial, scientific, and artistic innovation, and voluntary association and disassociation to create a market for normative behavior –  the vulgar peoples prevent us from having it, so we may go our own way and pay the costs and reap the benefits of doing so. My proposal, my organization’s proposal, is this – to reverse the crimes of the Jews and their accomplices in the media, academy, state, and finance by the following acts:

    • To restore the constitution to its original design as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by universal reciprocal exchange and insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity, administered a government of defense, finance and trade, and court, for the resolution of disputes between the states, and to restore the sovereignty of the states, and the self-determination of the states, free of federal involvement.
    • To formalize the constitution as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity – as a non-arbitrary, nature-made law of the universe that is inviolable by man.
    • To restore the differences between universal juridical defense, universal political defense from appropriation, and the demonstrated competence for application of political offense (force);
    • To restore the difference in juridical defense and political offense between prisoner, visitor, resident, ward, citizen, and sovereign.
    • And to restore the market for commons between the classes by the addition of ‘houses’ for middle classes.
    • To restore the purpose of the government and the state to the citizens of the nation and the nation alone, not the globe.
    • To restore rights to association and disassociation, cooperation and non, cohabitation and non, cooperative production and not, cooperative commons and non – thereby ending the failed experiments of the french revolt against empiricism, and the Jewish pre and postwar undermining of our people by taking advantage of their trust.
    • To restore individual responsibility and liability for the zero-tolerance defense of the self, family, and citizens and for the physical, normative, and informational commons, by force, by constraint, and zero tolerance for all crimes of challenge, aggression against life and property.
    • To end plausible deniability, escape from warranty, escape from due diligence, and to demand exhaustive due diligence in demonstration of truthful, reciprocal, testimonial speech, consistent with logical, physical, natural, evolutionary laws, in public, to the public, in matters public.
    • To restore the prohibition on, and liability for, interference in family, employment, business, or organization – forcing all of us to compete in the market for consumption or market for dispute resolution in the course, rather than by undermining by deceit. (end doxxing, effectively protect political identity and speech.)
    • To restore the prohibition on libel and slander (unjustifiable or falsehoods) regardless of harm.
    • To restore liability and punishment for legislative proposal or discussion of doing so;
    • To restore liability and punishment for sedition and treason by the organized undermining of these laws.
    • To restore loser-pays, prejudicial punishment for any attempt at circumventing these laws.
    • To insert the role of barrister and pursuit of the truth between them, to counter the pervasive deception in the legal profession.
    • To restore zero tolerance for perjury in court.
    • ( TAXATION HERE )
    • ( TOTAL DEBT FORGIVENESS HERE )
    • ( ECONOMY HERE )
    • ( EDUCATION HERE )
    • To restore the family not the individual to the purpose of policy.
    • To end incentives to divorce by restoring liability for interference in a marriage.
    • To end the criminalization of fatherhood, ending common property, child support, and alimony for all.
    • To restore penal colonies, the requirement they’re self-supporting, and the punishment of hard labor. To restore capital punishment for three strikes.

    And to once again constrain all people to rule of law of reciprocity: the self-determination of every individual by the exchange of individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty to the law,  the capital of the commons, and citizens. These policies will restore our ancient common law prohibitions that the jews artfully undermined in our law, by the pretense of moral ambitions, followed by saturation of the informational commons with propagada, followed by fostering dissent, and proposing legislative action, followed by selective prosecution of marginal cases before the court – all of which were designed to (a) undermine or civilization, (b) prevent Jewish acculturalization, prevent Jewish integration, and to foster Jewish separatism and nepotism, so that through aggressive nepotism the Anglo Saxon elites and germanic majority, would be displaced, and with them the intergenerational transfer of western civilization. To do this required they change the education system and the student body to assist them in undermining the civilization, and used continuous degradation of education and increasing numbers, taking advantage of the employment promise of a degree, and the high cost of that degree to fund their academic, media, propaganda campaigns. This got them access to women who are more easily subject to the Jewish method of deception. Then they undermined the family, sold women on the falsehood that they were oppressed rather than that marriage and family is the optimum compromise between the sexes, and the family the optimum purpose of policy, and the continuity of this tradition over the generation the purpose of our legal, philosophical, and religious traditions, whose primary function was to preserve our group advantage in high trust and the continuous production of commons and continuous commercial and technological innovation. The result was a demographic collapse in reproduction and the use of the fact that white women alone defect from their race under the pressure of conformity by Jewish undermining. And that  ( … ) they worked very hard to reverse the American criteria for citizenship and again through women, We can restore …. () No more lies will make sense-making possible. European natural religion has no devil, only demons. And we know the name of the worst of them all. His name was Abraham, he was from Ur, and The Jews and Muslims are his followers. And their weapon is lies. NO MORE LIES But every argument this complex requires evidence. The best method of producing that evidence is through the prosecution of ‘cases’ that the ‘jury’ is familiar will. So I will use current intellectuals both Jewish and european to illustrate who is engaging in Abrahamic deceit and undermining and who isn’t. Over the course of those videos of ‘popular’ pundits, you’ll begin to understand and identify the use of the Abrahamic method of deceit, and their industrialization of lying. Closing Neither I nor members of our organization seek power other than to deny power to those who would circumvent the universal demand for reciprocity in display, word, and deed, according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and continue the domestication, evolution, and transcendence of man into the gods and the universe into the heavens we imagine. The law of God and nature’s God wills it – or the expression of that will would not have written the laws of the universe for all of us who are not liars to see. You see – it’s not just that Europeans and our civilization are superior. It’s that our superiority is the natural order, because our people an our institutions are least different from the laws of the universe. And those that seek irreciprocity and deceit seek to not only deny, but also resist adaptation to, and prevent the application of those laws, by those of us who discover them – surviving by parasitism – despite the short, medium, and long term destruction of humanity that results from their actions. In effect, anyone who disagrees is by definition immoral, a threat to our people, and a threat to mankind. So in closing, we have then but one ambition: No More Lies.   ADD:  pursuit of power under protection of our power.

  • The Choice – Episode 0033 – The Prosecution. What Is To Be Done?

    How Can We End Abrahamic Deceit Forever?

    Restore our requirement that all public speech, to the public, in matters public be limited to testimony.  Really. That’s it. It’s quite simple. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information. Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true. How? Involuntary Warranty of Tests of Due Diligence 1 – Categorical consistency 2 – Logical consistency 3 – Empirical consistency 4 – Operational consistency 5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor) 6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity) 7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.) 8 – Full accounting of content and consequence within those limits. While this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice. And all the culture along with it. And all of mankind as a consequence. End the invention of lying.

    The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    Truth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural PeoplesWe Must Rule, if Not for The Sake of All Mankind, but Out of Self Defense.

    No More Books Of Lies

    The Vedas were invented to control The Avesta invented to divide The Talmud invented to deceive. The Bible invented to enslave. The Koran invented to conquer. Das Capital to steal. The General Theory to Impoverish. The Truth to set us free. NO MORE LIES.

    What is to be done?

    I operate under these presumptions (women, Jews, the success of institutions and law), and that man can be heroic in his reproductive sacrifices, and that we must separate and let the left create a record in history that is undeniable: that they will self destruct but they cannot take the only moral working class in the world down with them.  Instead, they make take all their kind down with them and in doing so, achieve greater evolution of man by the culling of the dysfunctional, than the european project has been able to achieve with its five ages of evolutions:

    • The indo-european expansion of aristocratic egalitarianism,
    • The Mediterranean expansion of the Greco Romans,
    • The continual continental expansion of the Germanics,
    • And the worldwide expansion of the Atlantic Europeans during the age of sail,
    • And culminating in the european postwar attempt to civilize the globe – at a profit of course.

    In fact, the only thing that stopped the european transformation of man was Judaism-Christianity-Islam in the ancient world and marxism-neo-marxism-postmodernism in the modern world’s beginning of the current dark age. No More Lies The Truth made the west: the incremental evolution of testimony according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. It is the most costly commons a people can develop – no one else has. And with that truth comes another uncomfortable truth: Man evolved as a self domesticating animal. First by neoteny, second socially, third institutionally, fourth technologically, and fifth scientifically. So No More Lies For those that are too vulgar for high culture, too vulgar for safe, beautiful, high trust commons, too vulgar for dedication to family and society, too vulgar for control of animal impulse, to vulgar to save for the future, then you are welcome to go your own way and pay the costs of doing so. For those of us that desire high culture, a homogenous polity, low power distance, elegant commons, low crime, safe streets, and a political order devoted to the family, friends, commercial, scientific, and artistic innovation, and voluntary association and disassociation to create a market for normative behavior –  the vulgar peoples prevent us from having it, so we may go our own way and pay the costs and reap the benefits of doing so. My proposal, my organization’s proposal, is this – to reverse the crimes of the Jews and their accomplices in the media, academy, state, and finance by the following acts:

    • To restore the constitution to its original design as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by universal reciprocal exchange and insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity, administered a government of defense, finance and trade, and court, for the resolution of disputes between the states, and to restore the sovereignty of the states, and the self-determination of the states, free of federal involvement.
    • To formalize the constitution as a declaration of the natural law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity – as a non-arbitrary, nature-made law of the universe that is inviolable by man.
    • To restore the differences between universal juridical defense, universal political defense from appropriation, and the demonstrated competence for application of political offense (force);
    • To restore the difference in juridical defense and political offense between prisoner, visitor, resident, ward, citizen, and sovereign.
    • And to restore the market for commons between the classes by the addition of ‘houses’ for middle classes.
    • To restore the purpose of the government and the state to the citizens of the nation and the nation alone, not the globe.
    • To restore rights to association and disassociation, cooperation and non, cohabitation and non, cooperative production and not, cooperative commons and non – thereby ending the failed experiments of the french revolt against empiricism, and the Jewish pre and postwar undermining of our people by taking advantage of their trust.
    • To restore individual responsibility and liability for the zero-tolerance defense of the self, family, and citizens and for the physical, normative, and informational commons, by force, by constraint, and zero tolerance for all crimes of challenge, aggression against life and property.
    • To end plausible deniability, escape from warranty, escape from due diligence, and to demand exhaustive due diligence in demonstration of truthful, reciprocal, testimonial speech, consistent with logical, physical, natural, evolutionary laws, in public, to the public, in matters public.
    • To restore the prohibition on, and liability for, interference in family, employment, business, or organization – forcing all of us to compete in the market for consumption or market for dispute resolution in the course, rather than by undermining by deceit. (end doxxing, effectively protect political identity and speech.)
    • To restore the prohibition on libel and slander (unjustifiable or falsehoods) regardless of harm.
    • To restore liability and punishment for legislative proposal or discussion of doing so;
    • To restore liability and punishment for sedition and treason by the organized undermining of these laws.
    • To restore loser-pays, prejudicial punishment for any attempt at circumventing these laws.
    • To insert the role of barrister and pursuit of the truth between them, to counter the pervasive deception in the legal profession.
    • To restore zero tolerance for perjury in court.
    • ( TAXATION HERE )
    • ( TOTAL DEBT FORGIVENESS HERE )
    • ( ECONOMY HERE )
    • ( EDUCATION HERE )
    • To restore the family not the individual to the purpose of policy.
    • To end incentives to divorce by restoring liability for interference in a marriage.
    • To end the criminalization of fatherhood, ending common property, child support, and alimony for all.
    • To restore penal colonies, the requirement they’re self-supporting, and the punishment of hard labor. To restore capital punishment for three strikes.

    And to once again constrain all people to rule of law of reciprocity: the self-determination of every individual by the exchange of individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty to the law,  the capital of the commons, and citizens. These policies will restore our ancient common law prohibitions that the jews artfully undermined in our law, by the pretense of moral ambitions, followed by saturation of the informational commons with propagada, followed by fostering dissent, and proposing legislative action, followed by selective prosecution of marginal cases before the court – all of which were designed to (a) undermine or civilization, (b) prevent Jewish acculturalization, prevent Jewish integration, and to foster Jewish separatism and nepotism, so that through aggressive nepotism the Anglo Saxon elites and germanic majority, would be displaced, and with them the intergenerational transfer of western civilization. To do this required they change the education system and the student body to assist them in undermining the civilization, and used continuous degradation of education and increasing numbers, taking advantage of the employment promise of a degree, and the high cost of that degree to fund their academic, media, propaganda campaigns. This got them access to women who are more easily subject to the Jewish method of deception. Then they undermined the family, sold women on the falsehood that they were oppressed rather than that marriage and family is the optimum compromise between the sexes, and the family the optimum purpose of policy, and the continuity of this tradition over the generation the purpose of our legal, philosophical, and religious traditions, whose primary function was to preserve our group advantage in high trust and the continuous production of commons and continuous commercial and technological innovation. The result was a demographic collapse in reproduction and the use of the fact that white women alone defect from their race under the pressure of conformity by Jewish undermining. And that  ( … ) they worked very hard to reverse the American criteria for citizenship and again through women, We can restore …. () No more lies will make sense-making possible. European natural religion has no devil, only demons. And we know the name of the worst of them all. His name was Abraham, he was from Ur, and The Jews and Muslims are his followers. And their weapon is lies. NO MORE LIES But every argument this complex requires evidence. The best method of producing that evidence is through the prosecution of ‘cases’ that the ‘jury’ is familiar will. So I will use current intellectuals both Jewish and european to illustrate who is engaging in Abrahamic deceit and undermining and who isn’t. Over the course of those videos of ‘popular’ pundits, you’ll begin to understand and identify the use of the Abrahamic method of deceit, and their industrialization of lying. Closing Neither I nor members of our organization seek power other than to deny power to those who would circumvent the universal demand for reciprocity in display, word, and deed, according to logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and continue the domestication, evolution, and transcendence of man into the gods and the universe into the heavens we imagine. The law of God and nature’s God wills it – or the expression of that will would not have written the laws of the universe for all of us who are not liars to see. You see – it’s not just that Europeans and our civilization are superior. It’s that our superiority is the natural order, because our people an our institutions are least different from the laws of the universe. And those that seek irreciprocity and deceit seek to not only deny, but also resist adaptation to, and prevent the application of those laws, by those of us who discover them – surviving by parasitism – despite the short, medium, and long term destruction of humanity that results from their actions. In effect, anyone who disagrees is by definition immoral, a threat to our people, and a threat to mankind. So in closing, we have then but one ambition: No More Lies.   ADD:  pursuit of power under protection of our power.

  • The Choice – Episode 0022 – The Prosecution. Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0022 – Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    Introduction I research and teach the scientific method, the universal vocabulary grammar and logic of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the natural law of reciprocity in display, word, and deed. This program – The natural law – is the completion of the greek, roman, germanic, anglo program. And it re-harmonizes our religion, philosophy, law, science, and mathematics into a single consistent coherent correspondent formal operational logic of the universe. It provides complete explanatory power. Really. And the consequences are as vast as the empirical and scientific revolutions. My work seeks to solve the great problems of the 20th century, the origins of which in large part are reducible to the most recent counter-revolution against western truth, reason, science, law, markets, adversarialism, and subsequent rate of evolution of European civilization, European people, and a reluctant world that wants nothing of it on the one hand while desperately seeking its proceeds on the other. While I had worked on artificial intelligence as a means of understanding mankind through most of the 80’s, it wasn’t until I decided to produce a value-neutral language of ethics and politics to compete with the Jewish left’s industrialization of lying, around 1990 – that I began this project. I was terribly ill throughout the 80’s and 90’s, despite building companies, which made progress difficult. But I discovered Hans Hoppe’s work just prior to 2000. And I felt I had found an answer to the problem of value-neutral commensurability. By 2006 I had an admittedly terrible first draft. It served the purpose of illustrating just how much I didn’t yet know. By 2009 I had a second draft. But it serves to help me  understand that I needed to solve the problem of demarcation between truth, falsehood, and deceit. I’d solved most of those problems by 2014, with a third draft. And by 2016 I had the full outline of the completed work. But it took until about last year to resolve the outstanding issues-particularly religion – and it was only over this past summer’s work on evolutionary history that I felt the project was complete and inescapable as a system of thought dependent entirely on first causes – the formal logic of all the sciences. Why Do We Need Truth and Universal Decidability Because the greater our numbers, the greater our scale of cooperation, the greater our division of labor, the more fragmentary our knowledge and information, the more free we are to pursue our individual and group interests, the more divergent those interests, and therefore the more necessity for positive markets for consumption, positive markets for commons, and negative markets we call courts for the resolution of our disputes, and the greater the demand for decidability in our law to both construct those consumptions and commons and resolve those differences. In other words, our law like our logics and sciences incrementally progresses to a single most parsimonious most universal logic and science decidability and universal explanatory power across all fields of human behavior. Taboos But some subjects are more controversial than others. Some evoke differences at the political level, some at the economic, some at the social, and some at the interpersonal, and even some among family members. The most contentious of those subjects are what we call taboos. But taboos both the most difficult and necessary subjects to resolve. So of necessity, the logic and science of universal decidability will answer those taboos, and those taboos generate the greatest demand for decidability so that societies, and polities and the world can move beyond them. A taboo is a subject we try not to discuss. Taboos can fulfill one or more of three purposes: in the positive, taboos assist in the normative suppression of human impulses that if satisfied would export costs directly or indirectly, and by that suppression forcing the development of people’s agency. In the Neutral, to prevent conflict between individuals and groups that may have similar cooperative interpersonal or market interests but different group, social, economic, and political interests. Or in the negative, to force ignorance in order to conduct a deceit, fraud, theft, parasitism, or predation. Taboo Breakers Pay A Cost European people, for accidental historical reasons, deep in pre-history, developed rule of law as their first institution, instead of religion or state. This is the ‘first cause’ of european civilization. Skipping the underclass religion phase, and the upper-class state phase and developing an upper-middle-class entrepreneurial civilization – the corporation. In the absence of authority only demonstrated interest provides decidability in matters of conflict. The logic of Demonstrated interests is what we call the law of tort. And testimony the method of investigating it. For this reason testimonial speech and military reporting, evolved into the normative language of the people. For this institutional reason and this reason alone, Europeans incrementally discovered, adapted to, and applied the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, creating their competitive advantage of initiative, adaptability, maneuver, and technology, despite small numbers and lesser wealth on the edge of the bronze age revolution. But Socrates was killed for heresy. Aristotle nearly. The Christians used virtue signaling to obtain office, allied to produce political power, and eventually killed or deported the philosophers (the european equivalent of an intellectual priesthood), destroyed the Greco-roman arts and letters, ended roman religion – which wasn’t religion as we understand it but an expression of loyalty to the state and the people, one’s city, ancestors, the laws of nature, and various natural spirits that were compatible with physical natural and evolutionary laws. The Christians ended literacy and prevented the restoration of the western roman aristocracy, greek and roman reason, and rule of law. They brought about underclass rule.  It wasn’t until the later middle ages that under primogeniture the church became a holding company for the aristocracy, and the aristocracy used the church leadership as a corporation for non-inheriting sons to manage aristocratic lands. This is what kept the church in check, the people ignorant and servile peasants, and the civilization in ignorance and poverty, during the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance. It wasn’t the church that rescued Europe from darkness but middle-income northern Italians translating the works of the greeks, returned to Europe by the flight of intellectuals from the middle east as Islam experienced the most recent of its exhaustions and declines and the natural determinism of fundamentalism – meaning law – replaced wisdom literature – meaning advice.  And it was the spread of ancient literature through the middle class seeking escape from the corruption of the church that led to centuries of war to escape it. So like Socrates, Aristotle and the Philosophers, Galileo was imprisoned for breaking a taboo, Darwin reviled for it, and the eugenicists removed from the historical record, and postwar social science converted to sophistry for it.  And I expect similar treatment. Because my work is the latest attempt to suppress pseudoscientific, philosophical, legal, economic, political, and theological deceits, and to once again free western civilization and western people to continue their long march to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, sophistry, deceits, conflict, poverty, starvation, disease,  suffering, and the victimization by a nature, planet, solar system, and universe all but hostile to life. I love my work but I don’t like my job. It’s a moral duty and a nearly unbearable personal cost.  So some of us must prevail against those taboos that prevent necessary conflict and that in turn prevents the discourse, accusation, prosecution and restitution for informational, social, and political crimes. And instead, to use the truth in discourse to cause conflict to bring about the end to those crimes, so that mankind once again can leap into a future of transcendence rather than continue down the current path to another dark age. So, I will, and history will judge your reaction to the following argument by whether you are stating it is true or false, or whether you’re stating that it’s a taboo, or that you merely disapprove. Worse, if you choose taboo or disapproval, and/or some sort of fraudulent argument, then you have by that demonstration selected yourself out of the jury as incapable of juridical decidability, political participation, and selected yourself for prosecution as well. The only question is whether the argument is true or not. And if it is true then what to do about it. No more lies

  • The Choice – Episode 0022 – The Prosecution. Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia

    Welcome to The Choice – Episode 0022 – Introduction to the Prosecution of the Enemy – and My Apologia –  I’m Curt Doolittle

    Introduction I research and teach the scientific method, the universal vocabulary grammar and logic of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and the natural law of reciprocity in display, word, and deed. This program – The natural law – is the completion of the greek, roman, germanic, anglo program. And it re-harmonizes our religion, philosophy, law, science, and mathematics into a single consistent coherent correspondent formal operational logic of the universe. It provides complete explanatory power. Really. And the consequences are as vast as the empirical and scientific revolutions. My work seeks to solve the great problems of the 20th century, the origins of which in large part are reducible to the most recent counter-revolution against western truth, reason, science, law, markets, adversarialism, and subsequent rate of evolution of European civilization, European people, and a reluctant world that wants nothing of it on the one hand while desperately seeking its proceeds on the other. While I had worked on artificial intelligence as a means of understanding mankind through most of the 80’s, it wasn’t until I decided to produce a value-neutral language of ethics and politics to compete with the Jewish left’s industrialization of lying, around 1990 – that I began this project. I was terribly ill throughout the 80’s and 90’s, despite building companies, which made progress difficult. But I discovered Hans Hoppe’s work just prior to 2000. And I felt I had found an answer to the problem of value-neutral commensurability. By 2006 I had an admittedly terrible first draft. It served the purpose of illustrating just how much I didn’t yet know. By 2009 I had a second draft. But it serves to help me  understand that I needed to solve the problem of demarcation between truth, falsehood, and deceit. I’d solved most of those problems by 2014, with a third draft. And by 2016 I had the full outline of the completed work. But it took until about last year to resolve the outstanding issues-particularly religion – and it was only over this past summer’s work on evolutionary history that I felt the project was complete and inescapable as a system of thought dependent entirely on first causes – the formal logic of all the sciences. Why Do We Need Truth and Universal Decidability Because the greater our numbers, the greater our scale of cooperation, the greater our division of labor, the more fragmentary our knowledge and information, the more free we are to pursue our individual and group interests, the more divergent those interests, and therefore the more necessity for positive markets for consumption, positive markets for commons, and negative markets we call courts for the resolution of our disputes, and the greater the demand for decidability in our law to both construct those consumptions and commons and resolve those differences. In other words, our law like our logics and sciences incrementally progresses to a single most parsimonious most universal logic and science decidability and universal explanatory power across all fields of human behavior. Taboos But some subjects are more controversial than others. Some evoke differences at the political level, some at the economic, some at the social, and some at the interpersonal, and even some among family members. The most contentious of those subjects are what we call taboos. But taboos both the most difficult and necessary subjects to resolve. So of necessity, the logic and science of universal decidability will answer those taboos, and those taboos generate the greatest demand for decidability so that societies, and polities and the world can move beyond them. A taboo is a subject we try not to discuss. Taboos can fulfill one or more of three purposes: in the positive, taboos assist in the normative suppression of human impulses that if satisfied would export costs directly or indirectly, and by that suppression forcing the development of people’s agency. In the Neutral, to prevent conflict between individuals and groups that may have similar cooperative interpersonal or market interests but different group, social, economic, and political interests. Or in the negative, to force ignorance in order to conduct a deceit, fraud, theft, parasitism, or predation. Taboo Breakers Pay A Cost European people, for accidental historical reasons, deep in pre-history, developed rule of law as their first institution, instead of religion or state. This is the ‘first cause’ of european civilization. Skipping the underclass religion phase, and the upper-class state phase and developing an upper-middle-class entrepreneurial civilization – the corporation. In the absence of authority only demonstrated interest provides decidability in matters of conflict. The logic of Demonstrated interests is what we call the law of tort. And testimony the method of investigating it. For this reason testimonial speech and military reporting, evolved into the normative language of the people. For this institutional reason and this reason alone, Europeans incrementally discovered, adapted to, and applied the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, creating their competitive advantage of initiative, adaptability, maneuver, and technology, despite small numbers and lesser wealth on the edge of the bronze age revolution. But Socrates was killed for heresy. Aristotle nearly. The Christians used virtue signaling to obtain office, allied to produce political power, and eventually killed or deported the philosophers (the european equivalent of an intellectual priesthood), destroyed the Greco-roman arts and letters, ended roman religion – which wasn’t religion as we understand it but an expression of loyalty to the state and the people, one’s city, ancestors, the laws of nature, and various natural spirits that were compatible with physical natural and evolutionary laws. The Christians ended literacy and prevented the restoration of the western roman aristocracy, greek and roman reason, and rule of law. They brought about underclass rule.  It wasn’t until the later middle ages that under primogeniture the church became a holding company for the aristocracy, and the aristocracy used the church leadership as a corporation for non-inheriting sons to manage aristocratic lands. This is what kept the church in check, the people ignorant and servile peasants, and the civilization in ignorance and poverty, during the Semitic Dark Ages of Ignorance. It wasn’t the church that rescued Europe from darkness but middle-income northern Italians translating the works of the greeks, returned to Europe by the flight of intellectuals from the middle east as Islam experienced the most recent of its exhaustions and declines and the natural determinism of fundamentalism – meaning law – replaced wisdom literature – meaning advice.  And it was the spread of ancient literature through the middle class seeking escape from the corruption of the church that led to centuries of war to escape it. So like Socrates, Aristotle and the Philosophers, Galileo was imprisoned for breaking a taboo, Darwin reviled for it, and the eugenicists removed from the historical record, and postwar social science converted to sophistry for it.  And I expect similar treatment. Because my work is the latest attempt to suppress pseudoscientific, philosophical, legal, economic, political, and theological deceits, and to once again free western civilization and western people to continue their long march to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, sophistry, deceits, conflict, poverty, starvation, disease,  suffering, and the victimization by a nature, planet, solar system, and universe all but hostile to life. I love my work but I don’t like my job. It’s a moral duty and a nearly unbearable personal cost.  So some of us must prevail against those taboos that prevent necessary conflict and that in turn prevents the discourse, accusation, prosecution and restitution for informational, social, and political crimes. And instead, to use the truth in discourse to cause conflict to bring about the end to those crimes, so that mankind once again can leap into a future of transcendence rather than continue down the current path to another dark age. So, I will, and history will judge your reaction to the following argument by whether you are stating it is true or false, or whether you’re stating that it’s a taboo, or that you merely disapprove. Worse, if you choose taboo or disapproval, and/or some sort of fraudulent argument, then you have by that demonstration selected yourself out of the jury as incapable of juridical decidability, political participation, and selected yourself for prosecution as well. The only question is whether the argument is true or not. And if it is true then what to do about it. No more lies

  • Now you’re just reaching for straws. So you’ve gone from pretention, to lying to

    Now you’re just reaching for straws. So you’ve gone from pretention, to lying to distraction, proving my point that you’re cognitively female using the female means of avoidance of truthful argument as a technique for masking ignorance and incompetence.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-28 16:36:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332725013267398656

    Reply addressees: @pIsbangmywife

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332721953711529986

  • More lies. You did nothing to prove I didn’t sweat, or have a thyroid, or I can

    More lies. You did nothing to prove I didn’t sweat, or have a thyroid, or I can regulate my body temperature, or chronic allergic inflammation. I don’t have to prove anything. I just testify it is true and look for falsificationary evidence.

    There isn’t any. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-28 16:25:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332722232926334976

    Reply addressees: @pIsbangmywife

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1332721210841587720