Once you grasp that the Abrahamic method of deceit is as advanced a system of lying as greek math & reason are a system of truth-telling, you begin to see all political discourse as a war between European(M) truth at the cost of eugenics and Semitic(F) deception to deny eugenics.
Theme: Deception
-
Abrahamic method of deceit is an advanced a system of lying
-
Abrahamic method of deceit is an advanced a system of lying
Once you grasp that the Abrahamic method of deceit is as advanced a system of lying as greek math & reason are a system of truth-telling, you begin to see all political discourse as a war between European(M) truth at the cost of eugenics and Semitic(F) deception to deny eugenics.
-
Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context
-“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend
This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:
a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.
- The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
- the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
- Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
- Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
- And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.
Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4
-
Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context
-“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend
This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:
a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.
- The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
- the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
- Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
- Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
- And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.
Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4
-
The Woke Religion
The degree to which ‘woke’ is a religion forces a redefinition of religion as simply requiring social construction of a narrative of non-correspondence with the laws of the universe to escape the laws of the universe, and an implied evil or enemy as a proxy for those laws.
-
The Woke Religion
The degree to which ‘woke’ is a religion forces a redefinition of religion as simply requiring social construction of a narrative of non-correspondence with the laws of the universe to escape the laws of the universe, and an implied evil or enemy as a proxy for those laws.
-
@Bangoob There are many ways to influence a population by means of suggestion. T
@Bangoob There are many ways to influence a population by means of suggestion. The suggestion of competence, insight, or authority that feeds the tendency of traumatized people to suspect conspiracies, and to respond with moral indignation inspiring and justifying their righteous retaliation is one of the best methods of all.
To the degree someone may have had signal intelligence inside the white house – we might claim that was indeed a possibility. To the degree that it was used to promote inspiration agitation, hope, and cope was a possibility.
To the degree that there was any organization of common interest within the administration or the state to support it appears to have been unlikely. Had such an organization of common interest existed, the failure of the capitol raid to deliver demands that would justify their action leaves the responsibility on the activists.
So my assessment at present is the most skeptical: that it was an agitprop joke or test, that turned into a movement, because it got traction for the reasons I stated above.
I didn’t follow it although I did have people actively keeping me informed. From that information, I didn’t see anything that wasn’t constructivist (causal relations were implied not demonstrated). The only evidence I’ve seen is that one individual may have had access to spaces and communications. There are plenty of low-level people in that information stream. I don’t want to dismiss the phenomenon or try to refute it because the momentum is valuable. I don’t want to claim it’s supportable because there is no information that makes it supportable.
If it turns out to be something more I would be pleasantly surprised. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 16:14:21 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105645556441843329
-
The degree to which ‘woke’ is a religion forces a redefinition of religion as si
The degree to which ‘woke’ is a religion forces a redefinition of religion as simply requiring social construction of a narrative of non-correspondence with the laws of the universe to escape the laws of the universe, and an implied evil or enemy as a proxy for those laws.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:40:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355541327958556677
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355539406241882113
-
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,eva
(It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355539961328635908
Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355538132305924102
-
7. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (
7. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining …
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 13:10:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503658365038593
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355503656989241354
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression,thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance.(Just as Popper predicted.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1355503656989241354