Theme: Deception

  • There is no difference between our challenge in overcoming Marxism-Pomo-Pc/Woke-

    There is no difference between our challenge in overcoming Marxism-Pomo-Pc/Woke-AntiWhite pseudoscience and sophistry and our challenge in over come Judaism-Christianity-Muslim-anti-indoeuropean-anti-aristocracy superstition and sophistry. We are telling addicts to give up drugs. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1374401061725761542

  • Reductive version is that the public is operating on theoretical knowledge that

    Reductive version is that the public is operating on theoretical knowledge that is a century old or more, and almost entirely false, and the post 1980 (2k?) knowledge has refuted, and replaced, and is discordant with that refuetd and replaced knowledge – but it’s unpleasant .


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 16:42:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374401061725761542

  • @ForWhomtheBellTolls Stop lying. We have the genetics. They aren’t refutable. ST

    @ForWhomtheBellTolls Stop lying. We have the genetics. They aren’t refutable. STOP YOUR LIES. The jewish authoriatarian religion (christianity) is a purely slave, desert, semitic, cult of reality denial. If you want to be a good christian then there is nothing more to it than the Jeffersonian Bible. All your fundamentlaism is just lying. So stop lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 14:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105939655174803304

  • Answering Tamil Gendler’s Justification of Lefistm (Second Jewish Counter Revolution against Truth)

    Just as Nozick answered Rawls, I’ll answer Gendler (And you won’t like it – especially because it’s true. ) This lecture, while explicative on its face, doesn’t, in fact, explain why philosophy failed, has been relegated to a branch of theology, is being defunded, and has been left in the dust by genetics, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, economics, and evolutionary biology and history: that reason being the revolution in thought that was created in northern Europe under the classical restoration (renaissance, empirical revolution, reformation,), mass literacy, the age of sail (in response to the Muslim blockade), allowed Europeans to escape the dead weight of landed aristocracy, parasitic church, and the Americans to escape the decadent peasantry as well, led to the sequence of agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. But the masses liberated from subsistence living (a) directed their class envy against ‘oppressors’ rather than the combination of nature’s fundamental laws, and their vulnerability to superstition and (b) had anthropomorphized the laws of nature in the aristocracy and church (state and faith) that had previously governed them, (c) despite that Descartes to Hilbert, Maxwell et all, Darwin, Menger, Malthus, Spencer, and Nietzsche had explained the reason for western success at ending poverty as caused by 5000 years of European culture’s and especially customary law’s, unique observance of those formal(logical), physical, natural(behavioral), and evolutionary laws – and natural eugenics (d) and thanks to the Jewish counter-revolution against the industrial and scientific revolution across the spectrum, creating a pseudoscientific superstition to replace the previous. So, Talmal Gendler (obviously Jewish, and selling the traditional Jewish false promise of freedom from those laws ) tries to justify the Marx-to-Rawls ‘Big Lie’ that we are free of formal, physical natural, and evolutionary laws. And that the second “big lie” of oppression conflates Europeans and their discovery, adaptation to, and application of those laws, exchanges constraint of the ‘unfit’ with that this is a European (white male) design – rather than Nature’s. Europeans and less so the Chinese, almost exclusively maintained natural selection. The Jewish counter-revolution against modernity has been as successful as the first Jewish (Christian) counter-revolution against modernity. Christianity (authoritarianism) may have only contributed to the downfall of the roman empire, but it guaranteed that it would not recover, prevented the industrial revolution from occurring before 500ad, and it created a dark age that cost us 1000 years of suffering, and the Muslim destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, Levant, Mesopotamia, Greco-roman, Persian, and a vast portion of the original Indian civilization. A false promise of freedom from reality. The second Jewish counter-revolution promises the same, and is in the process of repeating the same dark ages. There is no reason that Rome did not recover, even from the plague, other than the Jewish (Christian) conversion of a civilization predicated on the primacy of life, the primacy of man, the evolution of man, and the transcendence of man into gods, into authoritarian superstition, stagnation, and decay. So far, while the French Revolution cost us empirical rule of law everywhere but the anglosphere, and cost us the holy roman empire, causing the consolidation of greater germanic peoples who have always been the heart of European civilization and in doing so created the french, catholic, authoritarian version of Jewish anti-civilization, the second Jewish counter-revolution against reason, science, and ‘truth’ has cost us Russia, and as a consequence, European Empires, that were dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty,, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, victimization by a nature all but hostile to man. So the proper place of Marxist-to-Rawls “philosophy” is ‘another destructive theology’. It is not natural philosophy or moral philosophy in the European tradition. It is a theology in the Jewish Tradition of the end of scarcity, end of human nature (self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, and proportionality), and blaming host peoples (aristocracy) as a proxy for hating the universe (anthropomorphized as god). There is only one true evil on this planet and it is the Abrahamic religions in all their forms and sects, and the Abrahamic method of deceit, fraud, and cultural destruction: total war against evolution, science, reason, truth, and mankind. It is a religion, philosophy, pseudoscience, fraud, deceit, and denial, of hatred of reality. There is no difference between the second Jewish counter-revolution and the first other than the first was supernatural, and the second is pseudoscientific. THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION 1. Marxism(1850+): To cast Jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine European ascent into (recapture of) capital concentration. 2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts 3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration 4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism. 5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) 6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family. 7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin, Truth, Science, Reason. 8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution 9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian European Peoples The full list is here: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/03/23/european-vs-jewish-intellectuals-the-jewish-war-on-science-and-reason/ 1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the Holy Roman Empire. … (b) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (c) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (d) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (e) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

  • Answering Tamil Gendler’s Justification of Lefistm (Second Jewish Counter Revolution against Truth)

    Just as Nozick answered Rawls, I’ll answer Gendler (And you won’t like it – especially because it’s true. ) This lecture, while explicative on its face, doesn’t, in fact, explain why philosophy failed, has been relegated to a branch of theology, is being defunded, and has been left in the dust by genetics, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, economics, and evolutionary biology and history: that reason being the revolution in thought that was created in northern Europe under the classical restoration (renaissance, empirical revolution, reformation,), mass literacy, the age of sail (in response to the Muslim blockade), allowed Europeans to escape the dead weight of landed aristocracy, parasitic church, and the Americans to escape the decadent peasantry as well, led to the sequence of agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. But the masses liberated from subsistence living (a) directed their class envy against ‘oppressors’ rather than the combination of nature’s fundamental laws, and their vulnerability to superstition and (b) had anthropomorphized the laws of nature in the aristocracy and church (state and faith) that had previously governed them, (c) despite that Descartes to Hilbert, Maxwell et all, Darwin, Menger, Malthus, Spencer, and Nietzsche had explained the reason for western success at ending poverty as caused by 5000 years of European culture’s and especially customary law’s, unique observance of those formal(logical), physical, natural(behavioral), and evolutionary laws – and natural eugenics (d) and thanks to the Jewish counter-revolution against the industrial and scientific revolution across the spectrum, creating a pseudoscientific superstition to replace the previous. So, Talmal Gendler (obviously Jewish, and selling the traditional Jewish false promise of freedom from those laws ) tries to justify the Marx-to-Rawls ‘Big Lie’ that we are free of formal, physical natural, and evolutionary laws. And that the second “big lie” of oppression conflates Europeans and their discovery, adaptation to, and application of those laws, exchanges constraint of the ‘unfit’ with that this is a European (white male) design – rather than Nature’s. Europeans and less so the Chinese, almost exclusively maintained natural selection. The Jewish counter-revolution against modernity has been as successful as the first Jewish (Christian) counter-revolution against modernity. Christianity (authoritarianism) may have only contributed to the downfall of the roman empire, but it guaranteed that it would not recover, prevented the industrial revolution from occurring before 500ad, and it created a dark age that cost us 1000 years of suffering, and the Muslim destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, Levant, Mesopotamia, Greco-roman, Persian, and a vast portion of the original Indian civilization. A false promise of freedom from reality. The second Jewish counter-revolution promises the same, and is in the process of repeating the same dark ages. There is no reason that Rome did not recover, even from the plague, other than the Jewish (Christian) conversion of a civilization predicated on the primacy of life, the primacy of man, the evolution of man, and the transcendence of man into gods, into authoritarian superstition, stagnation, and decay. So far, while the French Revolution cost us empirical rule of law everywhere but the anglosphere, and cost us the holy roman empire, causing the consolidation of greater germanic peoples who have always been the heart of European civilization and in doing so created the french, catholic, authoritarian version of Jewish anti-civilization, the second Jewish counter-revolution against reason, science, and ‘truth’ has cost us Russia, and as a consequence, European Empires, that were dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty,, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, victimization by a nature all but hostile to man. So the proper place of Marxist-to-Rawls “philosophy” is ‘another destructive theology’. It is not natural philosophy or moral philosophy in the European tradition. It is a theology in the Jewish Tradition of the end of scarcity, end of human nature (self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, and proportionality), and blaming host peoples (aristocracy) as a proxy for hating the universe (anthropomorphized as god). There is only one true evil on this planet and it is the Abrahamic religions in all their forms and sects, and the Abrahamic method of deceit, fraud, and cultural destruction: total war against evolution, science, reason, truth, and mankind. It is a religion, philosophy, pseudoscience, fraud, deceit, and denial, of hatred of reality. There is no difference between the second Jewish counter-revolution and the first other than the first was supernatural, and the second is pseudoscientific. THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH COUNTER-REVOLUTION 1. Marxism(1850+): To cast Jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine European ascent into (recapture of) capital concentration. 2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts 3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration 4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism. 5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) 6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family. 7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin, Truth, Science, Reason. 8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution 9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian European Peoples The full list is here: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2021/03/23/european-vs-jewish-intellectuals-the-jewish-war-on-science-and-reason/ 1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the Holy Roman Empire. … (b) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (c) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (d) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (e) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

  • (First, I love him personally and he’s absolutely positively honest.) On the oth

    (First, I love him personally and he’s absolutely positively honest.) On the other hand, he’s also a Christian fundamentalist, an example of the majority of paranoid, sniveling cowards, that Christianity produces in the absence of military training, and real-world experience.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-21 14:11:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373638480056745985

    Reply addressees: @pieceacrud @Dune711

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1373636253032255492

  • Boost of @Afterrthought Arthur against Dragon Arta against Drūg Order against Tr

    Boost of @Afterrthought Arthur against Dragon
    Arta against Drūg
    Order against Trick

    where “trick” is the ancient word for fraud and deception, but embodies the cosmic principle antagonistic to order that is readily embodied by monsters such as dragons and draugr, which are chaos agents and undead.

    Arthur and the 12 knights of the round table symbolize the cosmic order of the sun and the 12 zodiac. @curtd@AshaLogos@StJ


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-20 12:50:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105922261385874361

  • Funny, that you’re trying to return us to the dark ages. This time with pseudosc

    Funny, that you’re trying to return us to the dark ages. This time with pseudoscience and sophistry not supernaturalism. Women brought Christianity. Women brought Neo-marxism, Postmodernism, Woke-PC, Cancel culture.

    Same cult. Same strategy. Different spin.
    You’re the vector.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 13:50:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1372908305572622342

    Reply addressees: @oXxRowanxXo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1372903261880135683

  • FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD

    FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD

    FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 13:42:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105916752102584717

  • Fashion Industry As An Example of Aesthetic Fraud

    “Fashion” outside of the top houses (which everyone knows: Gucci, RL, and the 20 or so others ) is presently a refuge of dysfunctionality – where they can hide under the pretense of skill and talent, and virtue signal like the rest of the neo-marxist movement: The cult of anti-beauty. When urbanites are desperate for unearned attention. When shallow novelty is their only means of achieving it. When ugly is the only remaining novelty. Because investment in beauty rather than novelty means you conform to excellence. But you are unable to compete by excellence. Either one produces innovations and adaptations that increase craftsmanship, aesthetics, and content or not. The rest is a measure of the ignorance of the public just like pseudoscience, sophistry, and supernaturalism: “Snake oil aesthetics”. There is a very great difference between student, amateur, craftsmanly, and high art (art proper). And the difference between good art and bad art is rather obvious. Novelty does not art make. Art is no more subjective than any other discipline. You either understand it or not, and can distinguish truth, adaptation, and innovation in craftsmanship, design, content(meaning) from fraud – or you can’t. The fact that you can be ‘sold’ fraud in art is no more surprising than that you can be sold any other fraud. Until now I hadn’t disambiguated “display” in “Reciprocity in display, word, and deed” as one of the principle means of fraud (physical: magic > pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry > idealism, aesthetic:(Undue Praise > Critique), and imaginary: Occult > Supernaturalism(theology). But it’s interesting that I can’t think of established terms for fraud by aesthetics – so perhaps that’s an interesting insight: that Female > Jewish > Marxist > Neo-Marxist Undue-Praise(Fraud) > Critique(Undermining), is one of the insights I hadn’t counted on. This is crushing to the continuing marxist-pomo-pc/woke – anti-civilization – Anti-White movement. No criminal practicing any form of previously tolerated fraud will accept and tolerate that they are cast as criminals. (BTW: The philosophy of art was my first philosophical subject matter back in the late 70’s. It’s the first discipline to which I applied disambiguation down to the first causes: investment.)